Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 508-511

  Hoehn, K S ^a   Nathan, A ^b   White, L E ^b   Ittenbach, R F ^b   Reynolds, W W ^b   Gaynor, J W ^b   Wernovsky, G ^b   Nicolson, S ^b   Nelson, R M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GENETIC RISK; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SPOUSE; TIME PERCEPTION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PARENTS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67649946276     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allmark P, Mason SA, Gill AB, Megone C. Obtaining consent for neonatal research. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F166-F167.
2. Mason SA, Allmark PJ. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: Interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 2000; 356(9247): 2045-2051.
3. Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F280-F286.
4. Kraybill EN. The challenge of informed consent in neonatal research. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 407-408.
5. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Tian ZY, Donaghue D, Alderfer MA et al. Parental decision-making in congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2004; 14: 1-6.
6. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Feudtner C et al. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90 3.
7. Zakay D. The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress, in time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. In: Svenson, Maule AJ (eds). Plenum Press: New York, 1993, pp 59-72.
8. Licht DJ, Wang J, Silvestre DW, Nicolson SC, Monetenegro LM, Wernovsky G et al. Preoperative cerebral blood flow is diminished in neonates with severe congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128(6): 841-849.
9. Richard L. Using NVivo in Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. QSR International: Melbourne, 2000.
10. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46.408. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Subpart D). In: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.
11. Zupancic JA, Gillie P, Streiner DL, Watts JL, Schmidt B. Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials. Pediatrics 1997; 99(1): E6.
12. Hulst JM, Peters JW, van den Bos A, Joosten KF, van Goudouever JB, Zimmerman LJ et al. Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in the pediatric ICU population. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 880-884.
13. Eder ML, Yamokoski AD, Wittmann PW, Kodish ED. Improving informed consent: Suggestions from parents of children with leukemia. Pediatrics 2007; 119(4): E849-e859.
14. Miller VA, Drotar D, Burant C, Kodish E. Clinician-parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30(3): 219-229.
15. Hall MA, Camacho F, Lawlor JS, Depuy V, Sugarman J, Weinfurt K. Measuring trust in medical researchers. Med Care 2006; 44 (11): 1048-1053.
16. Truog RD. Increasing the participation of children in clinical research. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 760-761.