Obtaining consent for neonatal research

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Allmark, P ^a,d   Mason, S ^b   Gill, A B ^c   Megone, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD CARE; CHILD WELFARE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEONATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; REVIEW;

EID: 0038218057     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 13592998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/fn.88.3.f166     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Mason S, Allmark P, on behalf of the Euricon Study Group. The Euricon Study: is obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials an elaborate ritual? A European Study: interviews with parents and clinicians. Lancet 2000;356:2045-51.
2. UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): the UK collaborative neonatal ECMO trial. Lancet 1996;348:75-82.
3. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomisation: responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1337-55.
4. Mason S, Megone C (eds). European neonatal research: consent, ethics committees and law. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2001.
5. Consensus Group of Teachers of Medical Ethics and Law in UK Medical Schools. Teaching medical ethics and law within medical education: a model for the UK core curriculum. J Med Ethics 1998;24:188-92.
6. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. London: DoH, 2001.
7. GMC Research: the role and responsibilities of a doctor (paragraph 20). http://www.gmc-uk.org/ (accessed 3.5.02.)
8. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (2000). http://www.wma.net/e/approvedhelsinki.html. (accessed 3.5.02.)
9. Consumers for Ethics in Research. http://www.ceres.org.uk. (accessed 22.8.02.)
10. Bastian H. Involving consumers in the Cochrane collaboration (1994). http://www.cochraneconsumer.com. (accessed 22.8.02.)
11. Kessler D. Protection of human subjects; informed consent: FDA. Final Rule. Federal Register 1996;61:51498-533.