The challenge of informed consent in neonatal research

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 407-408

  Kraybill, Ernest N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEONATOLOGY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATOLOGY; PARENTAL CONSENT;

EID: 4043143029     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211149     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Dougherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, et al. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in Phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 1995;13(5):1062-72.
2. Ballard HO, Shook LA, Desai NS, Anand KJS. Neonatal research and the validity of informed consent obtained in the perinatal period. J Perinatol 2004;24(7):409-15.