Short-Term adaptive modification of dynamic ocular accommodation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 3520-3528

  Bharadwaj, Shrikant R ^a   Vedamurthy, Indu ^b   Schor, Clifton M ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VELOCITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; DRUG EFFECT; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL;

MYDRIATIC AGENT; PHENYLEPHRINE;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; MYDRIATICS; PHENYLEPHRINE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PUPIL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67649946237     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2577     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, eds. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. St. Louis: Mosby;2003:197-237.
2. Heys KR, Cram SL, Truscott RJ. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? Mol Vis. 2004;10:956-963.
3. van Alphen GW, Graebel WP. Elasticity of tissues involved in accommodation. Vision Res. 1991;31:1417-1438.
4. Weeber HA, Eckert G, Soergel F, Meyer CH, Pechhold W, van der Heijde RG. Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:425-434.
5. Neider MW, Crawford K, Kaufman PL, Bito LZ. In vivo videography of the rhesus monkey accommodative apparatus: age-related loss of ciliary muscle response to central stimulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:69-74.
6. Tamm E, Croft MA, Jungkunz W, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman PL. Age-related loss of ciliary muscle mobility in the rhesus monkey: role of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:871-876.
7. Koretz JF, Cook CA, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye: changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:569-578.
8. Strenk SA, Semmlow JL, Strenk LM, Munoz P, Gronlund-Jacob J, DeMarco JK. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1162-1169.
9. Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Semmlow JL, DeMarco JK. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of age and accommodation on the human lens cross-sectional area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:539-545.
10. Fincham EF. The proportion of ciliary muscular force required for accommodation. J Physiol. 1955;128:99-112.
11. van der Hoeve J, Flieringa HJ. Accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1924;8:97-106.
12. Fincham EF, Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. J Physiol. 1957;137:488-508.
13. Bruce AS, Atchison DA, Bhoola H. Accommodation: convergence relationships and age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:406-413.
14. Eskridge JB. Age and the ac-A ratio. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973;50:105-107.
15. Heron G, Charman WN, Schor C. Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Vision Res. 2001;41:507-519.
16. Mordi JA, Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Res. 2004;44:591-601.
17. Schor CM, Bharadwaj SR. A pulse-step model of accommodation dynamics in the aging eye. Vision Res. 2005;45:1237-1254.
18. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics. Vision Res. 2006;46:1019-1037.
19. Bobier WR, Sivak JG. Orthoptic treatment of subjects showing slow accommodative responses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983; 60:678-687.
20. Liu JS, Lee M, Jang J, et al. Objective assessment of accommodation orthoptics. I. Dynamic insufficiency. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1979;56:285-294.
21. Crane HD, Steele CM. Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. Appl Opt. 1985;24:527.
22. Mordi J, Tucker J, Charman WN. Effects of 0.1% cyclopentolate or 10% phenylephrine on pupil diameter and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6:221-227.
23. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45:17-28.
24. Ciuffreda KJ. The Glenn A. Fry invited lecture: accommodation to gratings and more naturalistic stimuli. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68: 243-260.
25. Munoz P, Semmlow JL, Yuan W, Alvarez TL. Short term modification of disparity vergence eye movements. Vision Res. 1999;39: 1695-1705.
26. Takagi M, Oyamada H, Abe H, et al. Adaptive changes in dynamic properties of human disparity-induced vergence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1479-1486.
27. Collins T, Semroud A, Orriols E, Dore-Mazars K. Saccade dynamics before, during, and after saccadic adaptation in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:604-612.
28. Straube A, Deubel H. Rapid gain adaptation affects the dynamics of saccadic eye movements in humans. Vision Res. 1995;35:3451-3458.
29. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1435-1444.
30. Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1878-1888.
31. Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:153-164.
32. Schor CM, Lott LA, Pope D, Graham AD. Saccades reduce latency and increase velocity of ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 1999; 39:3769-3795.
33. Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2003;43:2945-2956.
34. Suryakumar R, Meyers JP, Irving EL, Bobier WR. Vergence accommodation and monocular closed loop blur accommodation have similar dynamic characteristics. Vision Res. 2007;47:327-337.
35. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2006;46:1507-1519.
36. Baumeister M, Wendt M, Glasser A. Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodative dynamics in anesthetized, middle-aged rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:25-33.
37. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Initial destination of the disaccommodation step response. Vision Res. 2006;46:1959-1972.
38. Takeda T, Ostberg O, Fukui Y, Iida T. Dynamic accommodation measurements for objective assessment of eyestrain and visual fatigue. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1988;17:21-35.
39. Vilupuru AS, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans. Vision Res. 2005; 45:181-191.
40. Schor CM. The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vision Res. 1979;19:757-765.
41. Miles FA. Adaptive regulation in the vergence and accommodation control systems. In: Berthoz, Melvill Jones G, eds. Adaptive Mechanism in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1985:81-94.
42. Aslin RN, Jackson RW. Accommodative-convergence in young infants: development of a synergistic sensory-motor system. Can J Psychol. 1979;33:222-231.
43. Rethy I. Development of the simultaneous fixation from the divergent anatomic eye-position of the neonate. J Pediatr Ophthalmol. 1969;6:92-96.
44. Fitzgibbon EJ, Goldberg ME, Seagraves MA. Short term saccadic adpatation in the monkey. In: Keller EL, Zee DS, eds. Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems. New York: Pergamon; 1986:329-334.
45. Mays LE, Gamlin PD. Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:763-768.
46. Yuan W, Semmlow JL, Alvarez TL, Munoz P. Dynamics of the disparity vergence step response: a model-based analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999;46:1191-1198.
47. Robinson DA. Models of the saccadic eye movement control system. Kybernetik. 1973;14:71-83.
48. Khosroyani M, Hung GK. A dual-mode dynamic model of the human accommodation system. Bull Math Biol. 2002;64(2):285-299.