Vergence accommodation and monocular closed loop blur accommodation have similar dynamic characteristics

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 327-337

  Suryakumar, Rajaraman ^a   Meyers, Jason P ^a   Irving, Elizabeth L ^a   Bobier, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Dynamics; Open loop; Velocity; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33846257684     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alvarez T.L., Semmlow J.L., and Pedrono C. Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1847-1855
2. Bahill A.T., Clark M.R., and Stark L. The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements. Mathematical Biosciences 24 (1975) 191-204
3. Beers A.P., and Van der Heijde G.L. In vivo determination of the biomechanical properties of the component elements of the accommodation mechanism. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2897-2905
4. Bharadwaj S.R., and Schor C.M. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1019-1037
5. Bharadwaj S.R., and Schor C.M. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Research 45 (2005) 17-28
6. Ciuffreda K.J., and Kruger P.B. Dynamics of accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 65 (1988) 365-370
7. Collewijn H., Erkelens C.J., and Steinman R.M. Voluntary binocular gaze-shifts in the plane of regard: dynamics of version and vergence. Vision Research 35 (1995) 3335-3358
8. Cumming B.G., and Judge S.J. Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 55 (1986) 896
9. DiScenna A.O., Das V., Zivotofsky A.Z., Seidman S.H., and Leigh R.J. Evaluation of a video tracking device for measurement of horizontal and vertical eye rotations during locomotion. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 58 (1995) 89-94
10. Erkelens C.J., van der S.J., Steinman R.M., and Collewijn H. Ocular vergence under natural conditions. I. continuous changes of target distance along the median plane. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 236 (1989) 417-440
11. Fincham E.F., and Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. Journal of Physiology 137 (1957) 488-508
12. Gamlin P.D., and Yoon K. An area for vergence eye movement in primate frontal cortex. Nature 407 (2000) 1003-1007
13. Heron G., Charman W.N., and Schor C.M. Age changes in the interactions between the accommodation and vergence systems. Optometry and Vision Science 78 (2001) 754-762
14. Hofstetter H.W. The proximal factor in accommodation and vergence. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 19 (1942) 67-76
15. Hung G.K., Ciuffreda K.J., Semmlow J.L., and Horng J.L. Vergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 35 (1994) 3486-3492
16. Hung G.K., Zhu H., and Ciuffreda K.J. Convergence and divergence exhibit different response characteristics to symmetric stimuli. Vision Research 37 (1997) 1197-1205
17. Jones R. Horizontal disparity vergence. In: Schor C.M., and Ciuffreda K.J. (Eds). Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects (1983), Butterworth Publishers, MA 297-316
18. Judge S.J., and Cumming B.G. Neurons in the monkey midbrain with activity related to vergence eye movement and accommodation. Journal of Neurophysiology 55 (1986) 915-930
19. Kasthurirangan S., and Glasser A. Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans. Investigative Ophthalmology Visual Science 46 (2005) 3463-3472
20. Kasthurirangan S., Vilupuru A.S., and Glasser A. Amplitude-dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Research 43 (2003) 2945-2956
21. Kent P.R. Convergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 35 (1958) 393-405
22. Kotulak J.C., and Schor C.M. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets. Vision Research 27 (1987) 1797-1806
23. Krishnan V.V., Farazian F., and Stark L. An analysis of latencies and prediction in the fusional vergence system. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 50 (1973) 933-939
24. Krishnan V.V., Shirachi D., and Stark L. Dynamic measures of vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 54 7 (1977) 470-473
25. Mordi J.A., and Ciuffreda K.J. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Research 44 (2004) 591-601
26. Phillips S., and Stark L. Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 43 (1977) 65-89
27. Rashbass C., and Westheimer G. Disjunctive eye movements. Journal of Physiology 159 (1961) 339-360
28. Schaeffel F., Wilhelm H., and Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. Journal of Physiology 461 (1993) 301-320
29. Schor C.M. A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. Optometry and Vision Science 69 (1992) 258-269
30. Schor C.M., and Kotulak J.C. Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Research 26 (1986) 927-942
31. Semmlow J.L. Oculomotor response to near stimuli: the near triad. In: Zuber B.L. (Ed). Models of oculomotor behavior and control. 1st edn. (1981), CRC Press, Boca Raton 162-191
32. Semmlow J.L., and Heerema D. The role of accommodative convergence at the limits of fusional vergence. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 18 (1979) 970-976
33. Semmlow J., and Venkiteswaran N. Dynamic accommodative vergence components in binocular vision. Vision Research 16 (1976) 403-410
34. Semmlow J.L., and Wetzel P. Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69 (1979) 639-645
35. Shirachi D., Liu J., Lee M., Jang J., Wong J., and Starks L. Accommodation dynamics I. range nonlinearity. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 55 (1978) 631-641
36. Smith G., and Atchison D.A. The badal optometer. In: Smith G., and Atchison D.A. (Eds). The eye and visual optical instruments. 1st edn. (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom 577-583
37. Sun F., and Stark L. Dynamics of accommodation: measurements for clinical application. Experimental Neurology 91 (1986) 71-79
38. Suryakumar R., Bobier W.R., and Irving E.L. Dynamics of convergence-accommodation are amplitude-dependent. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 45 (2004) E-Abstract 1740
39. Suryakumar R., Meyers J.P., Irving E.L., and Bobier W.R. Application of video based technology for the simultaneous measurement of accommodation and vergence. Vision Research (2006) 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.003
40. Tsuetaki T.K., and Schor C.M. Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 64 (1987) 437-449
41. Yamada T., and Ukai K. Amount of defocus is not used as an error signal in the control system of accommodation dynamics. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 17 (1997) 55-60
42. Zhang Y., Mays L.E., and Gamlin P.D. Characteristics of near response cells projecting to the oculomotor nucleus. Journal of Neurophysiology 67 (1992) 944