Comment on "methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review"

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 374-378

  Betts, Matthew G ^a   Ganio, Lisa M ^a   Huso, Manuela M P ^a   Som, Nicholas A ^a   Huettmann, Falk ^b   Bowman, Jeff ^c   Wintle, Brendan A ^d  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^c ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 67649921143     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05562.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Augustin, N. H. et al. 1996. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife J. Appl. Ecol. 33 : 339 347. (Pubitemid 126571646)
2. Bahn, V. McGill, B. J. 2007. Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 : 733 742. (Pubitemid 47593556)
3. Betts, M. G. et al. 2006. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence Ecol. Model. 191 : 197 224. (Pubitemid 41735463)
4. Betts, M. G. et al. 2008. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird Proc. R. Soc. B 275 : 2257 2263.
5. Bourque, J. Desrochers, A. 2006. Spatial aggregation of forest songbird territories and possible implications for area sensitivity Avian Cons. Ecol. 1 : 3.
6. Chevan, A. Sutherland, M. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning Am. Stat. 45 : 90 96.
7. Currie, D. J. 2007. Disentangling the roles of environment and space in ecology J. Biogeogr. 43 : 2009 2011. (Pubitemid 350126006)
8. Dormann, C. F. 2007. Assessing the validity of autologistic regression Ecol. Model. 207 : 234 242. (Pubitemid 47362484)
9. Dormann, C. F. et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review Ecography 30 : 609 628.
10. Duff, A. A. Morrell, T. E. 2007. Predictive occurrence models for bat species in California J. Wildl. Manage. 71 : 693 700.
11. Graham, M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression Ecology 84 : 2809 2815. (Pubitemid 38261430)
12. Griffith, D. A. Peres-Neto, P. R. 2006. Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses in exploiting relative location information Ecology 87 : 2603 2613.
13. Hahn, B. A. Silverman, E. D. 2007. Managing breeding forest songbirds with conspecific song playbacks Anim. Conserv. 10 : 436 441. (Pubitemid 350020094)
14. Hastie, T. J. Tibshirani, R. J. 1990. Generalized Additive Models, 1st ed. Chapman and Hall.
15. Hawkins, B. A. et al. 2007. Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology Ecography 30 : 375 384. (Pubitemid 46889894)
16. He, F. L. et al. 2003. Autologistic regression model for the distribution of vegetation J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 8 : 205 222.
17. Hoeting, J. A. et al. 2000. An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 5 : 102 114.
18. Kissling, W. D. Carl, G. 2008. Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 : 59 71. (Pubitemid 350215129)
19. Knapp, R. A. et al. 2003. Developing probabilistic models to predict amphibian site occupancy in a patchy landscape Ecol. Appl. 13 : 1069 1082. (Pubitemid 37546306)
20. Lawler, J. J. Edwards, T. C. 2006. A variance-decomposition approach to investigating multiscale habitat associations Condor 108 : 47 58. (Pubitemid 43221591)
21. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology? 74 : 1659 1673. (Pubitemid 24408336)
22. Manel, S. et al. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence J. Appl. Ecol. 38 : 921 931. (Pubitemid 32974271)
23. McPherson, J. M. Jetz, W. 2007. Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models Ecography 30 : 135 151. (Pubitemid 46310625)
24. Miller, J. et al. 2007. Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models Ecol. Model. 202 : 225 242. (Pubitemid 46356707)
25. Myers, R. H. 1990. Classical and modern regression with applications. PWS-Kent Publ. Company.
26. Osborne, P. E. et al. 2001. Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards J. Appl. Ecol. 38 : 458 471. (Pubitemid 32459237)
27. Petraitis, P. S. et al. 1996. Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis Funct. Ecol. 10 : 421 431.
28. Piorecky, M. D. Prescott, D. R. C. 2006. Multiple spatial scale logistic and autologistic habitat selection models for northern pygmy owls, along the eastern slopes of Alberta's Rocky Mountains Biol. Conserv. 129 : 360 371. (Pubitemid 43295735)
29. Segurado, P. et al. 2006. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models J. Appl. Ecol. 43 : 433 444. (Pubitemid 43725548)
30. van Teeffelen, A. J. A. Ovaskainen, O. 2007. Can the cause of aggregation be inferred from species distributions? Oikos 116 : 4 16. (Pubitemid 46103011)
31. Whittaker, J. 1984. Model interpretation from the additive elements of the likelihood function Appl. Stat. 33 : 52 64. (Pubitemid 14641345)
32. Wintle, B. A. Bardos, D. C. 2006. Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data Ecol. Appl. 16 : 1945 1958. (Pubitemid 44536939)
33. Wonnacott, T. H. Wonnacott, R. J. 1981. Regresssion: a second course in statistics, 1st ed. Wiley.