Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1440-1447

  Kim, Young Hoo ^a   Kim, Jun Shik ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; VANCOMYCIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLEXION CONTRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT INSTABILITY; JOINT LIMITATION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; SURVIVAL RATE; TENDON RUPTURE; THERAPY EFFECT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TUBERCULOUS ARTHRITIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROBABILITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 67649891200     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00425     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Vince KG, Long W. Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:172-177
2. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1700-1707
3. Kim YH. Salvage of failed hinge knee arthroplasty with a Total Condylar III type prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:272-277
4. Rosenberg AG, Verner JJ, Galante JO. Clinical results of total knee revision using the Total Condylar III prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:83-90.
5. Rand JA. Revision total knee arthroplasty using the Total Condylar III prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:279-284
6. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840 (Pubitemid 19037656)
7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14
8. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754-765
9. Barrack RL, McClure JT, Burak CF, Clohisy JC, Parvizi J, Hozack W. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient's perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:173-177 (Pubitemid 44900979)
10. Insall JN, editor. Surgery of the knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984. p 41-54.
11. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481
12. Greenwood M. A report on the natural duration of cancer. Report on public health and medical subjects, no.33. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office; 1926. p 1-26.
13. Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW. Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:78-85. (Pubitemid 18049785)
14. Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis. A minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:896-903. (Pubitemid 128713876)
15. Insall JN, Dethmers DA. Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:123-130
16. Mow CS, Wiedel JD. Revision total knee arthroplasty using the porous-coated anatomic revision prosthesis: six- to twelve-year results. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:681-6. Erratum in: J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:264.
17. Takahashi Y, Gustilo RB. Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:156-162
18. Rodriguez JA, Shahane S, Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS. Does the Total Condylar 3 constrained knee prosthesis predispose to failure of revision total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85 Suppl 4:153-156
19. Sheng PY, Jämsen E, Lehto MU, Konttinen YT, Pajamäki J, Halonen P. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the Total Condylar III system in inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1222-1224 (Pubitemid 41387561)