Revision total hip arthroplasty: The patient's perspective

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 453, Issue , 2006, Pages 173-177

  Barrack, Robert L ^a   McClure, J Thomas ^a   Burak, Corey F ^b   Clohisy, John C ^a   Parvizi, Javad ^c   Hozack, William ^c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LONGEVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURGEON; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845452251     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246537.67500.50     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Barrack RL, Hoffman GJ, Tejeiro WV, Carpenter LJ Jr. Surgeon work input and risk in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:281-286.
2. Barrack RL, Sawhney J, Hsu J, Cofield B. Cost analysis of revision total hip arthroplasty: a five year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:175-178.
3. Burton KE, Wright V, Richards J. Patients' expectations in relation to outcome of total hip replacement surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38:471-474.
4. Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:457-462.
5. Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Langeland N, Vollset SE. Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;351:135-148.
6. Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Chambers GK, Jagpal TJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:87-91.
7. Hutson MM, Blaha JD. Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:160-162.
8. Kearns S, Kingston R, Forman S, Murray P. How informed is consent? Use of an information booklet in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Ir Med J. 2001;94:171-172.
9. Langdon IJ, Hardin R, Learmonth ID. Informed consent for total hip arthroplasty: does a written information sheet improve recall by patients? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:404-408.
10. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, Finerman GA. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:835-838.
11. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:27-32.
12. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273-1279.
13. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387-396.
14. Robinson AH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:42-45.