Does the total condylar 3 constrained knee prosthesis predispose to failure of revision total knee replacement?

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2003, Pages 153-156

  Rodriguez, José A ^a   Shahane, Sunil ^b   Rasquinha, Vijay J ^b   Ranawat, Chitranjan S ^b  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0242664726     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200300004-00021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Vince KG, LongW. Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop. 1995;317:172-7.
2. Haas SB, Insali JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1700-7.
3. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:9-12.
4. Insali JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:13-4.
5. Donaldson WF 3rd, Sculco TP, Insali JN, Ranawat CS. Total condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:21-8.
6. Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:896-903.