Retrograde placement of ureteral stent and ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures in transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Tips of success in our learning curve

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 847-852

  Papalia, Rocco ^a,b   Simone, Giuseppe ^a   Leonardo, Costantino ^a   Guaglianone, Salvatore ^a   Forestiere, Ester ^a   Buscarini, Maurizio ^b   Gallucci, Michele ^a  

^a REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STENT; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URINARY CATHETER; URINE INCONTINENCE; ANASTOMOSIS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; STENT; SUTURE; URETER;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; STENTS; SUTURES; URETER;

EID: 67649882277     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0617     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526-531.
2. Soulié M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48-50.
3. Gnanapragasam VJ, Armitage TG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, initial experience in the management of UPJO. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:347-352.
4. El-Shazly MA, Moon DA, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyelo-plasty: Status and review of literature. J Endourol 2007;21: 673-678.
5. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44:340-345.
6. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
7. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999; 162:692-695.
8. Soulié M, Thoulouzan M, Seguin P, Mouly P, Vazzoler N, Pontonnier F, Plante P. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: Comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 2001;57:443-447.
9. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. A pilot study. Urology 1999;53:1099-1103.
10. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: Initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42:453-458.
11. Munver R, Sosa RE, del Pizzo JJ. Laparoscopic pyelo-plasty: History, evolution, and future. J Endourol 2004;18: 748-755.
12. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150:1795-1799.
13. Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, et al. Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2008;22:671-674.
14. Gaitonde K, Roesel G, Donovan J. Novel technique of retrograde ureteral stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2008;22:1199-1202.
15. Eden CG, Coptcoat MJ. Assessment of alternative tissue approximation techniques for laparoscopy. Br J Urol 1996;78: 234-242.
16. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status. BJU Int 2005; 95(suppl 2):102-105.
17. Türk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplast - the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-275.