Embodied anticipation: A neurodevelopmental interpretation

Discourse Processes

Volumn 46, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 103-126

  Kinsbourne, Marcel ^a   Jordan, J Scott ^b  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649866271     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530902728942     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Bargh, J. (1999). The Chameleon Effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
3. Bargh, J., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
4. Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 153-164.
5. Blakemore, S., & Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, 260-267.
6. Byrne, R. (2002). Seeing actions as hierarchically organized structures: Great ape manual skills. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 122-140). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Byrne, R. (2005). The maker not the tool: The cognitive significance of great ape manual skills. In V. Roux & B. Bril (Eds.), Knapping stone: A uniquely hominid behavior? (pp. 159-169). Cambridge, England: Macdonald Institute Monographs.
8. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 158, 1243-1249.
9. Carroll, L. (1994). Alice's adventures in wonderland. Ware, UK: Wordsworth Editions. Originally published in 1865.
10. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. London: MIT Press.
11. Clark, S. A., Allard, T., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1988). Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs. Nature, 332, 444-445.
12. Craig, C. M., & Lee, D. N. (1999). Neonatal control of sucking pressure: Evidence for an intrinsic tau-guide. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 371-382.
13. Custance, D. M., Prato Previde, E., Spiezio, C., Rigamonti, M., & Poli, M. (2006). Social learning in pig-tailed macaques (macaca nemestrina) and adult humans (homo sapiens) on a two-action artificial fruit. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 303-313.
14. Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2005). The neurophysiology of imitation and intersubjectivity. In S. Hurlye & N. Cater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (pp. 119-140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grezes, J., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage, 15, 265-272.
16. Erikson, E. (1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
17. Gabarini, F., & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56, 100-106.
18. Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. (2003). Functional imaging of "theory of mind." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77-83.
19. Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage, 16, 814-821.
20. Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36, 171-180.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Oberzaucher, E., Atzmüller, M., Blantar, I., & Mitteroecker, P. (2004). The representation of self reported affect in body posture and body posture simulation. Collegium Anthropologicum, 28(Suppl. 2), 159-173.
23. Grammer, K., & Oberzaucher, E. (2006, September). Dynamic communication models: An ecoethological view. Paper presented at Embodied Communication II: An Integrated Perspective, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
24. Harrison, N. A., Singer, T., Rotshtein, P., Dolan, R. J., & Critchley, H. D. (2006). Pupillary contagion: Central mechanisms engaged in sadness processing. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 5-17.
25. Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubjective synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303, 1634-1640.
26. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hershberger, W. (1976). Afference copy, the closed loop analogue of Von Holst's efference copy. Cybernetics Forum, 8, 97-102.
28. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
29. Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (pan troglodytes) and children (homo sapines). Animal Cognition, 8, 164-181.
30. Isabella, R. A., Belsky, J., & von Eye, A. (1989). Origins of infant-mother attachment: An examination of interactional synchrony during the infant's first year. Developmental Psychology, 25, 12-21.
31. Jones, S. (2006). Exploration or imitation? The effect of music on 4-week-old infants' tongue protrusions. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 126-130.
32. Jordan, J. S. (1998). Recasting Dewey's critique of the reflex-arc concept via a theory of anticipatory consciousness: Implications for theories of perception. New Ideas in Psychology, 16, 165-187.
33. Jordan, J. S. (2003). Emergence of self and other in perception and action. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 633-646.
34. Jordan, J. S. (2008). Wild-agency: Nested intentionalities in neuroscience and archeology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (Biological Sciences), 363, 1981-1991.
35. Kinsbourne, M. (1989). A model of adaptive behavior related to cerebral participation in emotional control. In G. Gainotti & C. Caltagirone (Eds.), Emotions and the dual brain (pp. 248-260). New York: Springer.
36. Kinsbourne, M. (1996). What qualifies a representation for a role in consciousness?In J. D. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 335-356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Kinsbourne, M. (2002). The role of imitation in body ownership and mental growth. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 311-330). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Kinsbourne, M. (2005). Imitation as entrainment: Brain mechanisms and social consequences. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 163-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Kinsbourne, M. (2005). Overlapping brain states for viewing and doing. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation. Volume 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals (pp. 210-214). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Gestures as embodied cognition: A neurodevelopmental interpretation. Gesture, 2, 205-214.
41. Krebs, J. R., & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed., pp. 380-402). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
42. La France, M. (1985). Postural mirroring and intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 207-217.
43. Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42-58.
44. Luria, A. (1973). The working brain. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
45. Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 146-152). London: Routledge.
46. Maurer, R. E., & Tindall, J. H. (1983). Effect of postural congruence on client's perception of counselor empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 158-163.
47. McGuigan, N., Whiten, A., Flynn, E., & Horner. (2007). Imitation of causally opaque versus causally transparent tool use by 3- and 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 22, 353-364.
48. Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2002). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B (Biological Sciences), 358, 491-500.
49. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, memory and the representation of persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 83-99.
50. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179-192.
51. Meltzoff, A. N., & Prinz, W. (2002). The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52. Miall, R. C., & Ivry, R. (2004). Moving to a different beat. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1025-1026.
53. Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306-1315.
54. Montague, P. R., Gally, J. A., & Edelman, G. M. (1991). Spatial signaling in the development and function of neural connection. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 199-220.
55. Nadel, J. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: Functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 42-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M. J., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron systems is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817-818.
57. Oakeshott, M. (1959). The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. London: Bowes & Bowes.
58. Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
59. Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85-90.
60. Richards, J. E. (2003) Attention affects the recognition of briefly presented visual stimuli in infants: An ERP study. Developmental Science, 6, 312-328.
61. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867-891.
62. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2002). From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 247-266). New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Rochat, P., & Hespos, S. J. (1997). Differential rooting reponses by neonates: Evidence for an early sense of self. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 105-112.
64. Schilder, P. (1935). The image and appearance of the human body. London: Kegan Paul.
65. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, 11-21.
66. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 859-870.
67. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
68. Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reveiws, 30, 855-863.
69. Singer, T., & Fehr, E. (2005). The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 95, 340-345.
70. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Dougherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not the sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157-1162.
71. Stern, D. (2000). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
72. Striano, T., Reid, V. M., & Hoehl, S. (2006). Neural mechanisms of joint attention in infancy. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2819-2823.
73. Toth, N., Schick, K. D., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Sevcik, R. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (1993). Pan the tool-maker: Investigations into the stone-tool-making and tool-suing capabilities of a bonobo (pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 81-91.
74. Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analysis of infant communication behaviour. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academic.
75. van der Meer, A. L. H. (1997). Keeping the arm in the limelight: Advanced visual control of arm movements in neonates. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 4, 103-108.
76. Van Hofsten, C. (2007). Action in development. Developmental Science, 10, 54-60.
77. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5(7), e184.
79. Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. London: MIT Press.
80. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655-664.
81. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.