Simulation of force loaded knee movement in a newly developed in vitro knee simulator;Simulation von belastungsabhängigen Kniebewegungen in einem neuartigen Knie-Simulator für In-vitro-Studien

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 142-149

  Müller, Otto ^a   Lo, Jiahsuan ^a   Wünschel, Markus ^a   Obloh, Christian ^a   Wülker, Nikolaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Belastet; Knee biomechanics; Knee kinematics; Load bearing

Indexed keywords

BELASTET; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROL MECHANISM; IN-VITRO; KINEMATIC VARIABLES; KNEE BIOMECHANICS; KNEE FLEXIONS; KNEE KINEMATICS; KNEE MOVEMENTS; KNEE SIMULATORS; LOAD BEARING; MUSCLE LOADING; REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES; SURGICAL TREATMENT; TARGET VALUES; TIBIAL ROTATIONS;

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BEARINGS (STRUCTURAL); BIOMECHANICS; KINEMATICS;

MUSCLE;

ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN EXERCISE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAMSTRING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; KNEE FUNCTION; MUSCLE FORCE; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; SIMULATOR;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROBOTICS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 67649739474     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2009.015     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andriacchi TP, Dyrby CO, Johnson TS. The use of functional analysis in evaluating knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 410: 44-53.
2. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1328-1335.
3. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A. The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 1988; 21: 705-720.
4. Bohnsack M, Halcour A, Klages P, et al. The influence of patellar bracing on patellar and knee load-distribution and kinematics: an experimental cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 135-141.
5. Bull AM, Amis AA. Knee joint motion: description and measurement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] J Eng Med 1998; 212: 357-372.
6. Chao EY. Justification of triaxial goniometer for the measurement of joint rotation. J Biomech 1980; 13: 989-1006.
7. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 111-118.
8. Corke PI. A robotics toolbox for MATLAB. IEEE Robot Automat Mag 1996; 3: 24-32.
9. D'Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, et al. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 213-220.
10. D'Lima DD, Steklov N, Fregly BJ, Banks SA, Colwell CW Jr. In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1549-1555.
11. D'Lima DD, Steklov N, Patil S, Colwell CW Jr. The Mark Coventry Award: in vivo knee forces during recreation and exercise after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 2605-2611.
12. DeFrate LE, Papannagari R, Gill TJ, et al. The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1240-1246.
13. Durselen L, Hehl G, Simnacher M, Kinzl L, Claes L. Augmentation of a ruptured posterior cruciate ligament provides normal knee joint stability during ligament healing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16: 222-228.
14. Elias JJ, DesJardins JD, Faust AF, Lietman SA, Chao EY. Size and position of a single condyle allograft influence knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 1999; 17: 540-545.
15. Elias JJ, Faust AF, Chu YH, Chao EY, Cosgarea AJ. The soleus muscle acts as an agonist for the anterior cruciate ligament. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 241-246.
16. Elias JJ, Kumagai M, Mitchell I, et al. In vitro kinematic patterns are similar for a fixed platform and a mobile bearing prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 467-474.
17. Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005; 38: 197-208.
18. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105: 136-144.
19. Heinlein B, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G. Design, calibration and pre-clinical testing of an instrumented tibial tray. J Biomech 2007; 40 (Suppl 1): S4-S10.
20. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 1196-1198.
21. Hsieh YF, Gordon N, Regnier F, et al. Multidimensional chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry for target-based screening. Mol Divers 1997; 2: 189-196.
22. Hsu WH, Fisk JA, Yamamoto Y, Debski RE, Woo SL. Differences in torsional joint stiffness of the knee between genders: a human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 765-770.
23. Hurschler C, Emmerich J, Wulker N. In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part I: model verification. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 614-622.
24. Johal P, Williams A, Wragg P, Hunt D, Gedroyc W. Tibiofemoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI. J Biomech 2005; 38: 269-276.
25. Kumagai M, Mizuno Y, Mattessich SM, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament rupture alters in vitro knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 395: 241-248.
26. Li G, Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, et al. The effects of ACL deficiency on mediolateral translation and varus-valgus rotation. Acta Orthop 2007; 78: 355-360.
27. Lo J, Muller O, Wunschel M, Bauer S, Wulker N. Forces in anterior cruciate ligament during simulated weight-bearing flexion with anterior and internal rotational tibial load. J Biomech 2008; 41: 1855-1861.
28. MacWilliams BA, DesJardins JD, Wilson DR, Romero J, Chao EY. A repeatable alignment method and local coordinate description for knee joint testing and kinematic measurement. J Biomech 1998; 31: 947-950.
29. MacWilliams BA, Wilson DR, DesJardins JD, Romero J, Chao EY. Hamstrings cocontraction reduces internal rota- tion, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight-bearing flexion. J Orthop Res 1999; 17: 817-822.
30. Maletsky LP, Hillberry BM. Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127: 123-133.
31. Mannel H, Marin F, Claes L, Durselen L. Establishment of a knee-joint coordinate system from helical axes analysis - a kinematic approach without anatomical referencing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 1341-1347.
32. Mizuno Y, Kumagai M, Mattessich SM, et al. Q-angle influences tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 834-840.
33. Mundermann A, Dyrby CO, D'Lima DD, Colwell CW Jr, Andriacchi TP. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1167-1172.
34. Ostermeier S, Holst M, Hurschler C, Windhagen H, Stukenborg-Colsman C. Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and contact pressure after lateral retinacular release: an in vitro study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15: 547-554.
35. Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, Nha KW, et al. Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 1507-1512.
36. Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D'Lima DD. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 332-338.
37. Shelburne KB, Pandy MG, Anderson FC, Torry MR. Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walking. J Biomech 2004; 37: 797-805.
38. Shelburne KB, Torry MR, Pandy MG. Effect of muscle compensation on knee instability during ACL-deficient gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 642-648.
39. Shelburne KB, Torry MR, Pandy MG. Contributions of muscles, ligaments, and the ground-reaction force to tibio- femoral joint loading during normal gait. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 1983-1990.
40. Shoemaker SC, Adams D, Daniel DM, Woo SL. Quadriceps/anterior cruciate graft interaction. An in vitro study of joint kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament graft tension. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 294: 379-390.
41. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 638-646.
42. Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N. Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis: in vitro analysis of 8 cadaver specimens in a dynamic model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 80.
43. Suggs JF, Li G, Park SE, et al. Knee biomechanics after UKA and its relation to the ACL - a robotic investigation. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 588-594.
44. Wei SH. Dynamic joint and muscle forces during knee isokinetic exercise. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 2000; 24: 161-168.
45. Williams A, Logan M. Understanding tibio-femoral motion. Knee 2004; 11: 81-88.
46. Woo SL, Abramowitch SD, Kilger R, Liang R. Biomechanics of knee ligaments: injury, healing, and repair. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1-20.
47. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W. The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 223-227.
48. Zavatsky AB. A kinematic-freedom analysis of a flexed-knee-stance testing rig. J Biomech 1997; 30: 277-280.
49. Zheng N, Fleisig GS, Escamilla RF, Barrentine SW. An analytical model of the knee for estimation of internal forces during exercise. J Biomech 1998; 31: 963-967.