Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: On the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 858-867

  Maloney, Erin ^a   Risko, Evan F ^a   O'Malley, Shannon ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Lexical entries; Nonword letter length; Reading aloud

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SERIAL LEARNING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 67649695515     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802578385     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445.
2. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition, 97, 45-54.
3. Bowers, J. S., & Michita, Y. (1998). An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji-Hiragana priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 259-264.
4. Bowey, J. A., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological receding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders' silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 203-219.
5. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. Dumay, N., & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Psychological Science, 18, 35-39.
7. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116-124.
8. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
9. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
10. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
11. Mackworth, J. F. (1986). Vigilance, arousal, and habituation. Psychological Review, 75, 308-322.
12. Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). Effects of repeated reading on the length effect in word and pseudoword reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 40-54.
13. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
14. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
15. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English lexicon project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45-52.
16. Perry, C., & Zeigler, J. C. (2002). Cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 990-1001.
17. Perry, C., Zeigler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
18. Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behaviour Research Methods, 39, 859-862.
19. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3-24). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
20. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307-314.
21. Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1303-1323.
22. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
23. Treisman, A. M. (1961). Attention and speech. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
24. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
25. Weekes, B. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.
26. Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369-373.