Extended averaged learning subspace method for hyperspectral data classification

Sensors

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 4247-4270

  Bagan, Hasi ^a   Takeuchi, Wataru ^b   Yamagata, Yoshiki ^a   Wang, Xiaohui ^c   Yasuoka, Yoshifumi ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Averaged learning subspace method; Classification; Dimension reduction; Hyperspectral; Land cover; Normalization; Remote sensing; Subspace method

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); SPECTROSCOPY;

AVERAGED LEARNING SUBSPACE METHOD; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DIMENSION REDUCTION; HYPERSPECTRAL; LAND COVER; LEARNING SUBSPACES; NORMALISATION; REMOTE-SENSING; SUBSPACE METHOD;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 67649610443     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s90604247     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lee, C.; Landgrebe, D.A. Analyzing high-dimensional multispectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1993, 31, 792-800.
2. Jimenez, L.O.; Landgrebe, D.A. Supervised classification in high-dimensional space: Geometrical, statistical, and asymptotically properties of multivariate data. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C Appl. Rev. 1998, 28, 39-54.
3. Bajcsy, P.; Groves, P. Methodology for hyperspectral band selection. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70, 793-802.
4. Hughes, G.F. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968, IT-14, 55-63.
5. Plaza, A.; Martínez, P.; Plaza, J.; Pérez, R. Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image data using sequences of extended morphological transformations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2005, 43, 466-479.
6. Serpico, S. B.; Moser, G. Extraction of spectral channels from hyperspectral images for classification purposes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 484-495.
7. Miao, X.; Gong, P; Swope, S.; Pu, R.L.; Carruthers, R.; Anderson, G.L. Detection of yellow starthistle through band selection and feature extraction from hyperspectral imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007, 73, 1005-1015.
8. Jimenez-Rodriguez, L.O.; Arzuaga-Cruz, E.; Velez-Reyes, M. Unsupervised linear featureextraction methods and their effects in the classification of high-dimensional data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 469-483.
9. Bioucas-Dias, J.M.; Nascimento, J. M. P. Hyperspectral subspace identification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 2435-2445.
10. Gagnon, P.; Scheibling, R.E.; Jones, W.; Tully, D. The role of digital bathymetry in mapping shallow marine vegetation from hyperspectral image data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 879-904.
11. Harris, J.R.; Ponomarev, P.; Shang, J.; Rogge, D. Noise reduction and best band selection techniques for improving classification results using hyperspectral data: application to lithological mapping in Canada's Arctic. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 2006, 32, 341-354.
12. Harsanyi, J., Chang, C.-I. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1994, 32, 779-785.
13. Melgani, F.; Bruzzone, L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 1778-1790.
14. Bazi, Y.; Melgani, F. Toward an optimal SVM classification system for hyperspectral remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 3374-3385.
15. Fauvel, M.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Chanussot, J.; Sveinsson, J.R. Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 3804-3814.
16. Zhao, K.G.; Popescu, S.; Zhang, X.S. Bayesian learning with Gaussian processes for supervised classification of hyperspectral data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2008, 74, 1223-1234.
17. Guo, B.; Damper, R.I.; Gunn, S.R.; Nelson, J.D.B. A fast separability-based feature-selection method for high-dimensional remotely sensed image classification. Patt. Recog. 2008, 41, 1653-1662.
18. Plaza, J.; Plaza, A.J.; Barra, C. Multi-channel morphological profiles for classification of hyperspectral images using support vector machines. Sensors 2009, 9, 196-218.
19. Kruse, F.A.; Lefkoff, A.B.; Boardman, J.B.; Heidebrecht, K.B.; Shapiro, A.T.; Barloon, P.J.; Goetz, A.F.H. The spectral image processing system (SIPS) - interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 44, 145-163.
20. Ball, J.E.; Bruce, L.M. Level set hyperspectral image classification using best band analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 3022-3027.
21. Watanabe, S.; Lambert, P.F.; Kulikowski, C.A.; Buxton, J.L.; R. Walker. Evaluation and selection of variables in pattern recognition; Computer and Information Sciences II; Tou, J.T., editor; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1967; pp. 91-122.
22. Sakano, H.; Mukawa, N.; Nakamura, T. Kernel mutual subspace method and its application for object recognition. Electron. Commun. Japan (Part II: Electron.) 2005, 88, 45-53.
23. Omachi, S.; Omachi, M. Fast image retrieval by subspace method with polynomial approximation. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2008, J91-D, 1561-1568.
24. Bagan, H.; Yasuoka, Y.; Endo, T.; Wang, X.; Feng, Z. Classification of airborne hyperspectral data based on the average learning subspace method. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008, 5, 368-372.
25. Elvidge, C.D.; Yuan, D.; Weerackoon, R.D.; Lunetta, R.S. Relative radiometric normalization of Landsat Multi-spectral Scanner (MSS) data using an automatic scattergram-controlled regression. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1995, 61, 1255-1260.
26. Olthof, I.; Pouliot, D.; Fernandes, R.; Latifovic, R. Landsat-7 ETM+ radiometric normalization comparison for northern mapping applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 95, 388-398.
27. Parlett, B.N. The QR algorithm, Comput. Sci. Eng. 2000, 2, 38-42.
28. Rutishauser, H.; The Jacobi method for real symmetric matrices. Numer. Math. 1966, 9, 1-10.
29. Landgrebe, D.A. Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.
30. Oja, E. Subspace Methods of Pattern Recognition; Research Studies Press and John Wiley & Sons: Letchworth, U.K. 1983.
31. Tsuda, K. Subspace classifier in the Hilbert space. Patt. Recog. Lett. 1999, 20, 513-519.
32. Laaksonen, J.; Oja, E. Subspace dimension selection and averaged learning subspace method in handwritten digit classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Bochum, Germany, 16-19 July, 1996, pp. 227-232.
33. Chang, C.C.; Lin, C.J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines 2001, [Online]. URL: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm (last date accessed: 1 May 2009).
34. Golub, G.H.; van der Vorst, H.A. Eigenvalue computation in the 20th century. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 123, 35-65.
35. st Ed.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999; p. 137.
36. Foody, G.M. Thematic map comparison evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70, 627-633.
37. Mathur, A.; Sanchez-Hernandez, C.; Boyd, D.S. Training set size requirements for the classification of a specific class. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 104, 1-14.
38. Waske, B.; Benediktsson, J.A. Fusion of support vector machines for classification of multisensor data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 3858-3866.
39. Scholkopf, B.; Smola, A.; Muller, K.R. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neur. Comput. 1998, 10, 1299-1319.
40. Washizawa, Y.; Yamashita, Y. Kernel projection classifiers with suppressing features of other classes. Neur. Comput. 2006, 18, 1932-1950.