A fast separability-based feature-selection method for high-dimensional remotely sensed image classification

Pattern Recognition

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1653-1662

  Guo, Baofeng ^a   Damper, R I ^a   Gunn, Steve R ^a   Nelson, J D B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Hyperspectral image classification; Mutual information; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ERROR ANALYSIS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTIMIZATION; REMOTE SENSING;

COMPUTATIONAL COST; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DATA; MUTUAL INFORMATION;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 38349181507     PISSN: 00313203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jain A., and Zongker D. Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19 2 (1997) 153-158
2. Blum A., and Langley P. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artif. Intell. 97 1-2 (1997) 245-271
3. AVIRIS, Airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer. [Online]. Available: 〈http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/〉.
4. Hughes G. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14 1 (1968) 55-63
5. Price J. Spectral band selection for visible-near infrared remote sensing: spectral-spatial resolution tradeoffs. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 35 5 (1997) 1277-1285
6. M. Velez-Reyes, L. Jimenez, Subset selection analysis for the reduction of hyperspectral imagery, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 3, Seattle, WA, 1998, pp. 1577-1581.
7. G. Petrie, P. Heasler, T. Warner, Optimal band selection strategies for hyperspectral data sets, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 3, Seattle, WA, 1998, pp. 1582-1584.
8. Chang C.-I., Qian D., Sun T.-L., and Althouse M. A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 37 6 (1999) 2631-2641
9. N. Keshava, Best bands selection for detection in hyperspectral processing, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP'01, vol. 5, Salt Lake City, UT, 2001, pp. 3149-3152.
10. Serpico S., and Bruzzone L. A new search algorithm for feature selection in hyperspectral remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 39 7 (2001) 1360-1367
11. Groves P., and Bajcsy P. Methodology for hyperspectral band and classification model selection. IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data. Greenbelt, MD (2003) 120-128
12. Kaewpijit S., Moigne J.L., and El-Ghazawi T. Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 41 4 (2003) 863-871
13. Qian D. Band selection and its impact on target detection and classification in hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data. Greenbelt, MD (2003) 374-377
14. Bajcsy P., and Groves P. Methodology for hyperspectral band selection. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing J. 70 7 (2004) 793-802
15. Melgani F., and Bruzzone L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 42 8 (2004) 1778-1790
16. Conesea C., and Masellia F. Selection of optimum bands from TM scenes through mutual information analysis. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sensing 48 3 (1993) 2-11
17. Guo B., Gunn S.R., Damper R.I., and Nelson J.B. Band selection for hyperspectral image classification using mutual information. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett. 3 4 (2006) 522-526
18. Battiti R. Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5 4 (1994) 537-550
19. Kwak N., and Choi C.-H. Input feature selection for classification problems. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13 1 (2002) 143-159
20. Fraser A.M., and Swinney H.L. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 33 2 (1986) 1134-1140
21. Swain P., and King R. Two effective feature selection criteria for multispectral remote sensing. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition. Washington, DC (1973) 536-540
22. Hellman M., and Raviv J. Probability of error, equivocation and the Chernoff bound. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16 4 (1970) 368-372
23. Feder M., and Merhav N. Relation between entropy and error probability. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 40 1 (1994) 259-266
24. D. Landgrebe, On information extraction principles for hyperspectral data: a white paper, Technical Report, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1997. [Online]. Available: 〈http://dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu/∼landgreb/whitepaper.pdf〉.
25. Gualtieri J., and Cromp R. Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote sensing classification. Proceedings of the 27th AIPR Workshop on Advances in Computer Assisted Recognition. Washington, DC (1998) 121-132
26. Boser B.E., Guyon I.M., and Vapnik V.N. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. Pittsburgh, PA (1992) 144-152
27. Cortes C., and Vapnik V.N. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20 3 (1995) 1-25
28. B. Guo, S.R. Gunn, R.I. Damper, J.B. Nelson, Adaptive band selection for hyperspectral image fusion using mutual information, in: Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Information Fusion, vol. 1, Philadelphia, PA, 2005, pp. 630-637.