From Presentation To Interaction: New Goals For online learning technologies;De la présentation à l’interaction: De nouveaux objectifs pour les technologies d’apprentissage en ligne;Von der Präsentation zur Interaktion: Neue Ziele für Online-Lerntechnologien

Educational Media International

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 189-206

  Tu, Chih Hsiung ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649395927     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980500161072     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, T., 2003. Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2) Available online at: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/anderson.html (5 accessed November 2003).
2. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P., 1996. Universities in the digital age. Change, 28(4): 10–19.
3. Brown, J. S., and Gray, E. S., 1995. The people are the company: how to build your company around your people. Fast Company, 1(1) Available online at: http://www.fastcompany.com/online/01/people.html (accessed 5 October 2002).
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Daguid, P., 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1): 32–41.
5. Bullen, M., 1998. Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2) Available online at: http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol13.2/bullen.html (accessed 10 March 1999).
6. Burge, E. J., 1988. Beyond andragogy: some explorations for distance learning design. Journal of Distance Education, 3(1): 5–23.
7. Bush, V., 1945. As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1) Available online at: http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm (accessed 15 May 2000).
8. de Gournay, C., 2002. “ Pretense of intimacy in France, in perpetual contact ”. In Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, Edited by: Katz, J. E., and Aakhus, M. A., 193–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. The knowledge media generation.Eisenstadt, M. (1995) Available online at: http://kmi.open.ac.uk/kmi-misc/kmi-feature.html (11 September 2001).
10. Garrison, D. R., 1993. “ Quality and access in distance education ”. In Theoretical principles of distance education, Edited by: Keegan, D., 9–21. New York: Routledge.
11. Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of self everyday life, New York: Doubleday.
12. Gordin, D. N., Gomez, L. M., Pea, R. D., and Fishman, B. J., 1996. Using the World Wide Web to build learning communities in K-12. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(3) Available online at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/gordin.html (15 December 2003).
13. Grabowski, B. L., 2003. “ Generative learning contributions to the design of instruction and learning ”. In Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. H., 719–743. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Gunawardena, C. N., and McIsaac, M. S., 2003. “ Distance education ”. In Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. H., 355–396. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., and Robins, J., 2000. Community development among distance learners: temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1) Available online at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html (accessed 15 March 2003).
16. Hildreth, P., Wright, P., and Kimble, C., 1999. “ Knowledge management: are we missing something? ”. In Information systems: the next generation, Edited by: Brooks, L., and Kimble, C., 347–356. McGraw Hill, York: UKAIS Conference.
17. Hill, J. R., and Land, S. M., 2004. “ Open-ended learning environments: an overview ”. In Educational technology: an encyclopedia, Edited by: Kovalchick, A., and Dawson, K., Vol. 2, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio. J–Z
18. Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., and Gunawardena, C. N., 1994. Learner-interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2): 30–42.
19. Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Turoff, M., and Benbunan-Fich, R., 2000. Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: a multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2) Available online at: www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_hiltz.asp (accessed 5 March 2001)
20. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., and Spangler, K., 1988. “ Teleconferencing: electronic group communication ”. In Small group communication: a reader, 5th Edn, Edited by: Cathcart, R. S., and Samovar, L. A., 140–154. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
21. Jonassen, D. H., 1996. Computers in the classrooms: mindtools for critical thinking, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Jonassen, D. H., and Reeves, T., 1996. “ Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools ”. In Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D., 693–719. New York: Scholastic Press.
23. Keegan, D., 1993. “ Reintegration of the teaching acts ”. In Theoretical principles of distance education, Edited by: Keegan, D., 113–134. New York: Toutledge.
24. Lajoie, S. P., 2000. Computers as cognitive tools: no more walls, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Lauzon, A. C., 1992. Integrating computer-based instruction with computer conferencing: an evaluation of a model for designing online education. American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2): 32–46.
26. Marquardt, M. J., and Kearsley, G., 1998. Technology-based learning: maximizing human performance and corporate success, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
27. McCombs, B., and Whistler, J. S., 1997. The learner-centered classroom and school: strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement, San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
28. McLoughlin, C., and Marshall, L., 2000. “ Scaffolding: a model for learner support in an online teaching environment in ”. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of Teaching Learning: Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching, Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
29. Mead, G. H., 1934. Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Moore, M. G., 1989. Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2): 1–6.
31. Papalia, A., 1976. Learner-centered language teaching: methods and materials, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Richards, P. (2001) MIT to make nearly all course materials available free on the World Wide Web: unprecedented step challenges ‘privatization of knowledge’. Available online at: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/ocw.html (accessed 11 June 2001).
33. Roberts-Witt, S., 2001. Knowledge everywhere: to succeed, dispersed enterprises must commit to managing collaboration and sharing expertise. Knowledge Management, 4(6) Available online at: http://www.destinationcrm.com/km/dcrm_km_article.asp?id=873&ed=6%2F1%2F01 (accessed 15 June 2002).
34. Roschelle, J. (1995) What should collaborative technology be? A perspective from Dewey and situated learning. Available online at: http://www.tu-harburg.de/aw1/newsletter/2/roschelle.pdf (accessed 3 March 2001).
35. Schlager, M., Fusco, J., and Schank, P., Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association,. April, New Orleans, LA.
36. Sistek-Chandler, C., 2000. Learning portals for K-12 education and beyond. Converge, 2(9) Available online at: http://www.centerdigitaled.com/converge/?pg=magstory&id=3389 (accessed 11 November 2000).
37. Stein, D. S., and Wanstreet, C. E., Role of social presence, choice of online or face-to-face group format, and satisfaction with perceived knowledge gained in a distance learning environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. October, Columbus, OH.
38. Stevens, L., 2000. Knowing what your company knows: a knowledge audit is a necessary precursor to a new KM initiative. Knowledge Management Magazine, 3(12): 38–42.
39. Tinzmann, M. B., Jones, B. F., Fennimore, T. F., Bakker, J., Fine, C., and Pierce, J., 1990. What is the collaborative classroom?, Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
40. Trindade, A. R., Carmo, H., and Bidarra, J., 2000. Current developments and best practice in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1) Available online at: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v1.1/carmo_et_al.pdf (accessed 1 March 2001).
41. Tu, C. H., 2000. Critical examination of factors affecting interaction on CMC. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 23(1): 39–58.
42. Tu, C. H., 2004. Twenty-one designs to build online collaborative learning community, Westport, CT: Library Unlimited.
43. Tu, C. H., and McIsaac, M. S., Community of practice for mentoring. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). April, Seattle, WA.
44. Walther, J. B., 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1): 52–90.
45. Walther, J. B., 1996. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1): 3–43.
46. Walther, J. B., and Boyd, S., 1997. “ Attraction to computer-mediated social support ”. In Communication technology and society: audience adoption and uses of the new media, Edited by: Lin, C. A., and Atkin, D., New York: Hampton Press.
47. Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. K., 1992. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19: 50–88.
48. Weiser, M., and Morrison, J., 1998. Project memory: information management for project team. Journal of Management Information System, 14(3): 149–166.