Intravascular Ultrasound Registration/Integration with Coronary Angiography

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 531-540

  Bruining, Nico ^a   de Winter, Sebastiaan ^a   Serruys, Patrick W ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary; Image processing; Interventions; Intravascular ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 67649336594     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Sones Jr. F.M. Cine-coronary arteriography. Ohio Med 58 (1962) 1018-1019
2. St. Goar F.G., Pinto F.J., Alderman E.L., et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: an in vivo comparison with quantitative angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 18 4 (1991) 952-958
3. De Scheerder I., De Man F., Herregods M.C., et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 127 2 (1994) 243-251
4. White C.J., Ramee S.R., Collins T.J., et al. Ambiguous coronary angiography: clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 26 3 (1992) 200-203
5. Fitzgerald P.J., St. Goar F.G., Connolly A.J., et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of coronary arteries. Is three layers the norm?. Circulation 86 1 (1992) 154-158
6. Lee D.Y., Eigler N., Luo H., et al. Effect of intracoronary ultrasound imaging on clinical decision making. Am Heart J 129 6 (1995) 1084-1093
7. Di Mario C., von Birgelen C., Prati F., et al. Three dimensional reconstruction of cross sectional intracoronary ultrasound: clinical or research tool?. Br Heart J 73 5 Suppl 2 (1995) 26-32
8. Mudra H., Klauss V., Blasini R., et al. Ultrasound guidance of Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stenting with a combined intravascular ultrasound balloon catheter. Circulation 90 3 (1994) 1252-1261
9. Tobis J., Azarbal B., and Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 8 (2007) 839-848
10. Pasterkamp G., Mali W.P., and Borst C. Application of intravascular ultrasound in remodelling studies. Semin Interv Cardiol 2 1 (1997) 11-18
11. Nissen S.E., Tsunoda T., Tuzcu E.M., et al. Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290 17 (2003) 2292-2300
12. Serruys P.W., Garcia-Garcia H.M., Buszman P., et al. Effects of the direct lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) inhibitor darapladib on human coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 118 11 (2008) 1172-1182
13. Rodriguez-Granillo G.A., de Winter S., Bruining N., et al. Effect of perindopril on coronary remodelling: insights from a multicentre, randomized study. Eur Heart J 28 19 (2007) 2326-2331
14. Ormiston J.A., Serruys P.W., Regar E., et al. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet 371 9616 (2008) 899-907
15. Grube E., Gerckens U., Buellesfeld L., et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Intracoronary imaging with optical coherence tomography: a new high-resolution technology providing striking visualization in the coronary artery. Circulation 106 18 (2002) 2409-2410
16. Achenbach S., Ropers D., Hoffmann U., et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 5 (2004) 842-847
17. Nieman K., Oudkerk M., Rensing B.J., et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357 9256 (2001) 599-603
18. Di Mario C., Gorge G., Peters R., et al. Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound. Study Group on Intracoronary Imaging of the Working Group of Coronary Circulation and of the Subgroup on Intravascular Ultrasound of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 19 2 (1998) 207-229
19. Slager C.J., Wentzel J.J., Schuurbiers J.C., et al. True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation 102 5 (2000) 511-516
20. Wahle A., Wellnhofer E., Mugaragu I., et al. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14 2 (1995) 230-241
21. Serruys P.W., Reiber J.H., Wijns W., et al. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. Am J Cardiol 54 6 (1984) 482-488
22. Reiber J.H., Serruys P.W., Kooijman C.J., et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71 2 (1985) 280-288
23. Bidgood Jr. W.D., and Horii S.C. Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics 12 2 (1992) 345-355
24. Noumeir R. Benefits of the DICOM structured report. J Digit Imaging 19 4 (2006) 295-306
25. Suselbeck T., Latsch A., von Furstenberg M., et al. [Expansion of the Multilink-Tristar stent after direct implantation and predilatation: comparison of clinical, angiography and intravascular ultrasound parameters]. Z Kardiol 91 6 (2002) 487-492 [in German]
26. Reiber J.H., van Eldik-Helleman P., Visser-Akkerman N., et al. Variabilities in measurement of coronary arterial dimensions resulting from variations in cineframe selection. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 14 4 (1988) 221-228
27. Serruys P.W., Luijten H.E., Beatt K.J., et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. Circulation 77 2 (1988) 361-371
28. Foley D.P., Melkert R., Umans V.A., et al. Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups. Eur Heart J 16 10 (1995) 1331-1346
29. Serruys P.W., de Jaegere P., Kiemeneij F., et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 331 8 (1994) 489-495
30. Reiber J.H., Kooijman C.J., Slager C.J., et al. Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 3 3 (1984) 131-141
31. Reiber J.H., van der Zwet P.M., Koning G., et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 28 3 (1993) 187-198
32. Keane D., Haase J., Slager C.J., et al. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 91 8 (1995) 2174-2183
33. Agostoni P., Biondi-Zoccai G., Van Langenhove G., et al. Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 102 3 (2008) 272-279
34. Ramcharitar S., Daeman J., Patterson M., et al. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71 1 (2008) 44-50
35. Wahle A., Prause P.M., DeJong S.C., et al. Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography-methods and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18 8 (1999) 686-699
36. Latib A., Colombo A., and Sangiorgi G. Bifurcation stenting: current strategies and new devices. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 95 6 (2009) 495-504
37. Adriaenssens T., Byrne R.A., Dibra A., et al. Culotte stenting technique in coronary bifurcation disease: angiographic follow-up using dedicated quantitative coronary angiographic analysis and 12 month clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 29 23 (2008) 2868-2876
38. Mintz G.S., Nissen S.E., Anderson W.D., et al. American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (ivus). a report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 5 (2001) 1478-1492
39. Bruining N., von Birgelen C., de Feyter P.J., et al. ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 43 3 (1998) 254-260
40. von Birgelen C., de Vrey E.A., Mintz G.S., et al. ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: feasibility and reproducibility of the automated analysis of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in humans. Circulation 96 9 (1997) 2944-2952
41. Arbab-Zadeh A., DeMaria A.N., Penny W.F., et al. Axial movement of the intravascular ultrasound probe during the cardiac cycle: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and measurements of coronary dimensions. Am Heart J 138 5 Pt 1 (1999) 865-872
42. De Winter S.A., Hamers R., Degertekin M., et al. Retrospective image-based gating of intracoronary ultrasound images for improved quantitative analysis: the Intelligate method. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61 1 (2004) 84-94
43. Li W., von Birgelen C., Di Mario C., et al. Semi-automated contour detection for volumetric quantification of intracoronary ultrasound. Comput Cardiol 21 (1994) 277-280
44. Nissen S.E. Application of intravascular ultrasound to characterize coronary artery disease and assess the progression or regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 89 4A (2002) 24B-31
45. Bruining N., Verheye S., Knaapen M., et al. Three-dimensional and quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic plaque composition by automated differential echogenicity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70 7 (2007) 968-978
46. Nair A., Kuban B.D., Tuzcu E.M., et al. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 106 17 (2002) 2200-2206
47. Wenguang L., Gussenhoven W.J., Zhong Y., et al. Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 6 3-4 (1991) 247-253
48. Hamers R., Bruining N., Knook M., et al. A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Cardiol 28 (2001) 589-592
49. Wahle A., Prause G.P., von Birgelen C., et al. Fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound in vivo: establishing the absolute 3-D frame orientation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46 10 (1999) 1176-1180
50. Bourantas C.V., Kourtis I.C., Plissiti M.E., et al. A method for 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries using biplane angiography and intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29 8 (2005) 597-606
51. Wahle A., Lopez J.J., Olszewski M.E., et al. Plaque development, vessel curvature, and wall shear stress in coronary arteries assessed by X-ray angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Med Image Anal 10 4 (2006) 615-631
52. Slager C.J., Wentzel J.J., Gijsen F.J., et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nature 2 9 (2005) 456-464
53. Slager C.J., Wentzel J.J., Gijsen F.J., et al. The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nature 2 8 (2005) 401-407
54. Ramcharitar S., van Geuns R.J., Patterson M., et al. A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72 6 (2008) 761-770