Rotational Coronary Angiography

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 395-405

  Klein, Andrew J P ^a   Garcia, Joel A ^b,c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

180 rotation; Angiography; Coronary; Dual axis; Off axis rotation; Rotational angiography; Standard angiography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODIXANOL;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION SAFETY; REVIEW; ROTATIONAL ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; SCREENING TEST;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; RADIATION DOSAGE;

EID: 67649321444     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Green N.E., Chen S.Y., Messenger J.C., et al. Three-dimensional vascular angiography. Curr Probl Cardiol 29 3 (2004) 104-142
2. Mintz G.S., Painter J.A., Pichard A.D., et al. Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 25 7 (1995) 1479-1485
3. Nissen S.E., Gurley J.C., Grines C.L., et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 84 3 (1991) 1087-1099
4. Ventura H.O., White C.J., Jain S.P., et al. Assessment of intracoronary morphology in cardiac transplant recipients by angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 72 11 (1993) 805-809
5. Ramee S.R., White C.J., Collins T.J., et al. Percutaneous angioscopy during coronary angioplasty using a steerable microangioscope. J Am Coll Cardiol 17 1 (1991) 100-105
6. Teirstein P.S., Schatz R.A., DeNardo S.J., et al. Angioscopic versus angiographic detection of thrombus during coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 75 16 (1995) 1083-1087
7. Fearon W.F., Takagi A., Jeremias A., et al. Use of fractional myocardial flow reserve to assess the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol 86 9 (2000) 1013-1014 A1010
8. Pijls N.H., De Bruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334 26 (1996) 1703-1708
9. White C.W., Wright C.B., Doty D.B., et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?. N Engl J Med 310 13 (1984) 819-824
10. Arnett E.N., Isner J.M., Redwood D.R., et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 91 3 (1979) 350-356
11. Schwartz J.N., Kong Y., Hackel D.B., et al. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 36 2 (1975) 174-178
12. Vlodaver Z., Frech R., Van Tassel R.A., et al. Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 47 1 (1973) 162-169
13. Green N.E., Chen S.Y., Hansgen A.R., et al. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64 4 (2005) 451-459
14. Isner J.M., Kishel J., Kent K.M., et al. Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic-histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients. Circulation 63 5 (1981) 1056-1064
15. Topol E.J., and Nissen S.E. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92 8 (1995) 2333-2342
16. Galbraith J.E., Murphy M.L., and de Soyza N. Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. JAMA 240 19 (1978) 2053-2056
17. Scanlon P.J., Faxon D.P., Audet A.M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33 6 (1999) 1756-1824
18. Spears J.R., Sandor T., Baim D.S., et al. The minimum error in estimating coronary luminal cross-sectional area from cineangiographic diameter measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 9 2 (1983) 119-128
19. Tommasini G., Camerini A., Gatti A., et al. Panoramic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 31 4 (1998) 871-877
20. Maddux J.T., Wink O., Messenger J.C., et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62 2 (2004) 167-174
21. Akhtar M., Vakharia K.T., Mishell J., et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 66 1 (2005) 43-49
22. Mehran R., Aymong E.D., Nikolsky E., et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 7 (2004) 1393-1399
23. Kuon E., Niederst P.N., and Dahm J.B. Usefulness of rotational spin for coronary angiography in patients with advanced renal insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 90 4 (2002) 369-373
24. Raman S.V., Morford R., Neff M., et al. Rotational X-ray coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63 2 (2004) 201-207
25. Garcia J.A., Agostoni P., Green N.E., et al. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73 6 (2009) 753-761
26. Rasche V., Movassaghi B., Grass M., et al. Automatic selection of the optimal cardiac phase for gated three-dimensional coronary x-ray angiography. Acad Radiol 13 5 (2006) 630-640
27. Garcia J.A., Chen S.Y., Messenger J.C., et al. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70 2 (2007) 190-196
28. Garcia J.A., Movassaghi B., Casserly I.P., et al. Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2008) [Epub ahead of print]
29. Klein AJ, Kim M, Casserly IP, et al. Safety and efficacy of XperSwing dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus standard coronary angiography. Paper presented at: American College of Cardiology, Orlando, FL, 2009.
30. Horisaki T., Katoh O., Imai S., et al. Feasibility evaluation of dual axis rotational angiography (XperSwing) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. MedicaMundi 52 2 (2008) 11-13