A mathematical model and a computer tool for the Tower of Hanoi and Tower of London puzzles

Information Sciences

Volumn 179, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 2934-2947

  Hinz, Andreas M ^a   Kostov, Anton ^b   Kneißl, Fabian ^c   Sürer, Fatma ^c   Danek, Adrian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAGEN   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computerized test; State graphs; Tower of Hanoi; Tower of London

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; SOFTWARE TESTING; TOWERS;

COMPUTERIZED TESTS; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; POST PROCESSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; STATE GRAPHS; SYMMETRY PROPERTIES; TOWER OF HANOI; TOWERS OF HANOI;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 67649246866     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Anderson J.R., Albert M.V., and Fincham J.M. Tracing problem solving in real time: fMRI analysis of the subject-paced Tower of Hanoi. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 1261-1274
2. Anderson J.R., and Douglass S. Tower of Hanoi: evidence for the cost of goal retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 1331-1346
3. Anderson J.R., Kushmerick N., and Lebiere C. The Tower of Hanoi and goal structures. In: Anderson J.R. (Ed). Rules of the Mind (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 121-142
4. Beauchamp M.H., Dagher A., Aston J.A.D., and Doyon J. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1649-1660
5. Beaunieux H., Hubert V., Pitel A.L., Desgranges B., and Eustache F. Episodic memory deficits slow down the dynamics of cognitive procedural learning in normal ageing. Memory 17 (2009) 197-207
6. Berg W.K., and Byrd D.L. The Tower of London spatial problem-solving task: enhancing clinical and research implementation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 24 (2002) 586-604
7. Berg W.K., Byrd D.L., McNamara J.P.H., and MacDonald C.A. New indices of planning abilities using the Tower of London task. In: Poreh A.M. (Ed). The Quantified Process Approach to Neuropsychological Assessment (2006), Taylor & Francis, New York, NY 225-248
8. Biggs N.L., Lloyd E.K., and Wilson R.J. Graph Theory 1736-1936 (1986), Clarendon Press, Oxford
9. Bode J.-P., and Hinz A.M. Results and open problems on the Tower of Hanoi. Congressus Numerantium 139 (1999) 113-122
10. Bull R., Espy K.A., and Senn T.E. A comparison of performance on the Towers of London and Hanoi in young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45 (2004) 743-754
11. Chen X., Tian B., and Wang L. Santa Claus' Towers of Hanoi. Graphs and Combinatorics 23 Suppl. (2007) 153-167
12. Claus N., and d'Hanoi{dotless}̈ L.T. Jeu de calcul. Science et Nature 1/8 (1884) 127-128
13. Cohen N.J., Eichenbaum H., Deacedo B.S., and Corkin S. Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 444 (1985) 54-71
14. DX as a measure of the executive functioning of ADHD children. Assessment 5 (1998) 215-226
15. Dehaene S., and Changeux J.-P. A hierarchical neuronal network for planning behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 94 (1997) 13293-13298
16. Dinitz Y., and Solomon S. Optimality of an algorithm solving the Bottleneck Tower of Hanoi problem. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 4 (2008) Article 25
17. Egan D.E., and Greeno J.G. Theory of rule induction: knowledge acquired in concept learning, serial pattern learning, and problem solving. In: Gregg L.W. (Ed). Knowledge and Cognition (1974), Lawrence Erlbaum, Potomac, MD (Chapter 4)
18. Er M.C. A general algorithm for finding a shortest path between two n-configurations. Information Sciences 42 (1987) 137-141
19. Faber A., Hinz A., Bötzel K., and Danek A. Parkinson's disease impairs the learning effect specific for isomorphic Tower of London problems. Journal of Neural Transmission 114 (2008) xviii
20. A.H. Faber, N. Kühnpast, F. Sürer, A.M. Hinz, A. Danek, The iso-effect: is there specific learning of Tower of London iso-problems? Thinking and Reasoning (in press).
21. Franceschi M., Caffarra P., De Vreese L., Pelati O., Pradelli S., Savarè R., Cerutti R., Grossi E., and the ToL Research Group. Visuospatial planning and problem solving in Alzheimer's disease patients: a study with the Tower of London test. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 24 (2007) 424-428
22. Goel V., and Grafman J. Are the frontal lobes implicated in "planning" functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia 33 (1995) 623-642
23. Guevara M.A., Rizo L., Ruiz-Díaz M., and Hernández-Gonzáles M. HANOIPC3: a computer program to evaluate executive functions. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 95 (2009) 158-165
24. K.S. Herbst, Problem solving and planning in chess players: a Tower of Hanoi/Tower of London study, Technical Report, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, 2008.
25. Hinz A.M. The Tower of Hanoi. L'Enseignement Mathématique 35 2 (1989) 289-321
26. Hinz A.M. Shortest paths between regular states of the Tower of Hanoi. Information Sciences 63 (1992) 173-181
27. Hinz A.M., Klavžar S., Milutinović U., Parisse D., and Petr C. Metric properties of the Tower of Hanoi graphs and Stern's diatomic sequence. European Journal of Combinatorics 26 (2005) 693-708
28. Hinz A.M., and Parisse D. On the planarity of Hanoi graphs. Expositiones Mathematicae 20 (2002) 262-268
29. Humes G.E., Welsh M.C., Retzlaff P.D., and Cookson N. Towers of Hanoi and London: reliability and validity of two executive function tasks. Assessment 4 (1997) 249-257
30. A.R. Jonckheere, in: Les modèles et la formalisation du comportement, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1967, pp. 265-266.
31. Kafer K.L., and Hunter M. On testing the face validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3 (1997) 108-119
32. C.P. Kaller, B. Rahm, K. Bolkenius, J.M. Unterrainer, Eye movements and visuospatial problem solving: identifying separable phases of complex cognition, Psychophysiology (in press).
33. Kaller C.P., Rahm B., Spreer J., Mader I., and Unterrainer J.M. Thinking around the corner: the development of planning abilities. Brain and Cognition 67 (2008) 360-370
34. Kaller C.P., Unterrainer J.M., Rahm B., and Halsband U. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Research 20 (2004) 462-472
35. Karat J. A model of problem solving with incomplete constraint knowledge. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 538-559
36. Klahr D. Goal formation, planning, and learning by pre-school problem solvers or: "My Socks are in the Dryer". In: Siegler R.S. (Ed). Children's thinking: what develops? (1978), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 181-212
37. Klahr D., and Robinson M. Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children. Cognitive Psychology 13 (1981) 113-148
38. Klix F., Neumann J., Seeber A., and Sydow H. Die algorithmische Beschreibung des Lösungsprinzips einer Denkanforderung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 168 (1963) 123-141
39. Klix F., and Rautenstrauch-Goede K. Struktur- und Komponentenanalyse von Problemlösungsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 174 (1967) 167-193
40. Korf R.E. Linear-time disk-based implicit graph search. Journal of the ACM 55 (2008) Article 26
41. R. Korf, A. Felner, Recent progress in heuristic search: a case study of the Four-Peg Towers of Hanoi problem, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-07), Hyderabad, 2007, pp. 2324-2329.
42. Kotovsky K., Hayes J.R., and Simon H.A. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology 17 (1985) 248-294
43. Krikorian R., Bartok J., and Gay N. Tower of London procedure: a standard method and developmental data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 16 (1994) 840-850
44. Kühnpast N., Faber A., Sürer F., Hinz A.M., and Danek A. Planning and problem-solving: performance of healthy adults on the tablet PC Tower of London puzzle. Journal of Neurology 255 Suppl. 2 (2008) 164
45. Lindley E.H. A study of puzzles with special reference to the psychology of mental adaption. American Journal of Psychology 8 (1897) 431-493
46. van Lint J.H., and Wilson R.M. A Course in Combinatorics. second ed. (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
47. Mataix-Cols D., and Bartrés-Faz D. Is the use of the wooden and computerized versions of the Tower of Hanoi puzzle equivalent?. Applied Neuropsychology 9 (2002) 117-120
48. Matthes G. Der Einsatz des "Turm von Hanoi"-Computerprogramms zur Diagnostik von Störungen des problemlösenden Denkens bei Patienten mit erworbenen Hirnschäden. Biomedical Journal 19 (1988) 10-13
49. McKinlay A., Kaller C.P., Grace R.C., Dalrymple-Alford J.C., Anderson T.J., Fink J., and Roger D. Planning in Parkinson's disease: a matter of problem structure?. Neuropsychologia 46 (2008) 384-389
50. Morris R.G., Miotto E.C., Feigenbaum J.D., Bullock P., and Polkey C.E. The effect of goal-subgoal conflict in planning ability after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 1147-1157
51. Newell A., and Simon H.A. Human Problem Solving (1972), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
52. Newman S.D., Carpenter P.A., Varma S., and Just M.A. Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1668-1682
53. Newman S.D., and Pittman G. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 29 (2007) 333-342
54. Owen A.M., Downes J.J., Sahakian B.J., Polkey C.E., and Robbins T.W. Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 1021-1034
55. Romik D. Shortest paths in the Tower of Hanoi graph and finite automata. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 20 (2006) 610-622
56. Saint-Cyr J.A., Taylor A.E., and Lang A.E. Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain 111 (1988) 941-959
57. Schnirman G.M., Welsh M.C., and Retzlaff P.D. Development of the Tower of London - Revised. Assessment 5 (1998) 355-360
58. Schuhwerk S., Sürer F., Linn J., Noachtar S., and Danek A. Tower of Hanoi and London performance after epilepsy surgery to the temporal or frontal lobes. Aktuelle Neurologie 34 (2007) S92
59. Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 298 (1982) 199-209
60. Simon H.A. The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975) 268-288
61. P.K. Stockmeyer, Private communication, 2005.
62. Sürer F., Forkel S., Hinz A., and Danek A. Towers of Hanoi and London on a tablet-PC: correlations with other executive tests. Aktuelle Neurologie 34 (2007) S122
63. Sydow H. Zur metrischen Erfassung von subjektiven Problemzuständen und zu deren Veränderung im Denkprozeß (I). Zeitschrift für Psychologie 177 (1970) 145-198
64. J.R. Tunstall, Improving the utility of the Tower of London, a neuropsychological test of planning, MPh Thesis, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld., 1999.
65. Unterrainer J.M., Kaller C.P., Halsband U., and Rahm B. Planning abilities and chess: a comparison of chess and non-chess players on the Tower of London task. British Journal of Psychology 97 (2006) 299-311
66. J.M. Unterrainer, C.P. Kaller, B. Rahm, Planning abilities and chess II: time restriction and motivational aspects on planning performance in chess players (submitted for publication).
67. Unterrainer J.M., Rahm B., Halsband U., and Kaller C.P. What is in a name: comparing the Tower of London with one of its variants. Cognitive Brain Research 23 (2005) 418-428
68. Unterrainer J.M., Rahm B., Kaller C.P., Leonhart R., Quiske K., Hoppe-Seyler K., Meier C., Müller C., and Halsband U. Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 26 (2004) 846-856
69. Unterrainer J.M., Rahm B., Leonhart R., Ruff C.C., and Halsband U. The Tower of London: the impact of instructions, cueing, and learning on planning abilities. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 675-683
70. Valverde A.H., Jimenez-Escrig A., Gobernado J., and Barón M. A short neuropsychologic and cognitive evaluation of frontotemporal dementia. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 111 (2009) 251-255
71. S. Varma, A computational model of Tower of Hanoi problem solving, PhD Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 2006.
72. Vuico O., Sürer F., and Danek A. Influence of instructions on performance in the Tower of Hanoi and Tower of London puzzles. Aktuelle Neurologie 34 (2007) S121
73. Ward G., and Allport A. Planning and problem-solving using the Five-disc Tower of London task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A (1997) 49-78
74. Welsh M.C., and Huizinga M. The development and preliminary validation of the Tower of Hanoi - Revised. Assessment 8 (2001) 167-176
75. Welsh M.C., Satterlee-Cartmell T., and Stine M. Towers of Hanoi and London: contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance. Brain and Cognition 41 (1999) 231-242
76. West D.B. Introduction to Graph Theory. second ed. (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
77. Wood D. Adjudicating a Towers of Hanoi contest. Journal of Computational Mathematics 14 (1983) 199-207
78. Zhang J., and Norman D.A. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18 (1994) 87-122
79. Zook N.A., Davalos D.B., DeLosh E.L., and Davis H.P. Working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence as predictors of performance on Tower of Hanoi and London tasks. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 286-292