Flexible structural protein alignment by a sequence of local transformations

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1625-1631

  Rocha, Jairo ^a   Segura, Joan ^a   Wilson, Richard C ^b   Dasgupta, Swagata ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLASSIFIER; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 67649221642     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp296     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andreeva,A. et al. (2007) SISYPHUS: Structural alignments for proteins with non-trivial relationships. Nucleic Acids Res., 35 D253-D259.
2. Birzele,F. et al. (2006) Vorolign: Fast structural alignment using Voronoi contacts. Bioinformatics, 23, 205-211.
3. Csaba,G. et al. (2008) Protein structural alignment considering phenotypical plasticity. Bioinformatics, 24, 98-104.
4. Holm,L. and Sander,C. (1993) Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 233 , 123-138.
5. Kawabata,T. and Nishikawa,K. (2000) Protein structure comparison using the Markov transition model of evolution. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 41 , 108-122.
6. Kolodny,R. et al. (2005) Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: Scoring by geometric measures. J. Mol. Biol., 343, 1173-1188.
7. Kouranov,A. et al. (2006) The RCSB PDB information portal for structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res., 34 (Database issue), 302-305.
8. Levitt,M. and Gerstein,M. (1998) A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 5913-5920.
9. Mayr,G. et al. (2007) Comparative analysis of protein structure alignments. BMC Struct. Biol., 7, 50.
10. Menke,M. et al. (2008) Matt: Local flexibility aids protein multiple structure alignment. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, 88-99.
11. Murzin,A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
12. Orengo,C.A. et al. (1997) CATH- a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5 1093-1108.
13. Shatsky,M. et al. (2002) Flexible protein alignment and hinge detection. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 48 , 242-256.
14. Sierk,M. and Pearson,W. (2004) Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison. Protein Sci., 13, 773-785.
15. Standley,D.M. et al. (2007) ASH structure alignment package: sensitivity and selectivity domain classification. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 116.
16. Taylor,W.R. (1999) Protein structure comparison using iterated double dynamic programming. Protein Sci., 8, 654-65.
17. Taylor,W.R. and Orengo,C.A. (1989) Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 208, 1-22.
18. Yuzhen,Y. and Godzik,A. (2003) Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics, 19, 246-255.
19. Zhang,Y. and Skolnick,J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform., 57, 702-710.
20. Zhang,Y. and Skolnick,J. (2005) TM-align: A protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 2302-2309.