Comparative analysis of protein structure alignments

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Mayr, Gabriele ^a,b   Domingues, Francisco S ^b   Lackner, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STRUCTURAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND VARIABILITY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 34548304928     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-7-50     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Deja vu all over again: finding and analyzing protein structure similarities. ML Sierk GJ Kleywegt, Structure (Camb) 2004 12 12 2103 2111
2. Structural proteomics: a tool for genome annotation. AF Yakunin AA Yee A Savchenko AM Edwards CH Arrowsmith, Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004 8 42 8 10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.12.003 15036155
3. Automated clustering of ensembles of alternative models in protein structure databases. FS Domingues J Rahnenführer T Lengauer, Protein Eng Des Sel 2004 17 537 43 10.1093/protein/gzh063 15319469
4. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. RB Russell MA Saqi RA Sayle PA Bates MJ Sternberg, J Mol Biol 1997 269 423 39 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1019 9199410
5. Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structures. S Pascarella P Argos, J Mol Biol 1992 224 461 71 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91008-D 1560462
6. Fold change in evolution of protein structures. N Grishin, J Struct Biol 2001 134 167 85 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 11551177
7. How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. A Murzin, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998 8 380 7 10.1016/S0959-440X(98)80073-0 9666335
8. Circular permutations of natural protein sequences: structural evidence. Y Lindqvist G Schneider, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997 7 422 427 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80061-9 9204286
9. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? A Godzik, Protein Sci 1996 5 1325 38 8819165
10. Alternative alignments from comparison of protein structures. ESC Shih MJ Hwang, Proteins 2004 56 519 27 10.1002/prot.20124 15229884
11. Evaluation of protein fold comparison servers. M Novotny D Madsen GJ Kleywegt, Proteins 2004 54 260 70 10.1002/prot.10553 14696188
12. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. I Shindyalov P Bourne, Protein Eng 1998 11 739 47 10.1093/protein/11.9.739 9796821
13. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. L Holm C Sander, J Mol Biol 1993 233 123 38 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489 8377180
14. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Y Ye A Godzik, Bioinformatics 2003 19 Suppl 2 II246 II255 14534198
15. Protein structure alignment using environmental profiles. J Jung B Lee, Protein Eng 2000 13 535 543 10.1093/protein/13.8.535 10964982
16. A novel approach to structural alignment using realistic structural and environmental information. Y Chen GM Crippen, Protein Sci 2005 14 2935 46 10.1110/ps.051428205 16260755
17. MATRAS: A program for protein 3D structure comparison. T Kawabata, Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31 3367 3369 12824329 10.1093/nar/gkg581
18. A computer vision based technique for 3-D sequence-independent structural comparison of proteins. O Bachar D Fischer R Nussinov H Wolfson, Protein Eng 1993 6 279 88 10.1093/protein/6.3.279 8506262
19. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. M Shatsky R Nussinov HJ Wolfson, Proteins 2004 56 143 56 10.1002/prot.10628 15162494
20. Development and validation of a consistency based multiple structure alignment algorithm. J Ebert D Brutlag, Bioinformatics 2006 22 1080 7 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl046 16473868
21. CE-MC: a multiple protein structure alignment server. C Guda S Lu ED Scheeff PE Bourne IN Shindyalov, Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 W100 3 15215359 10.1093/nar/gkh464
22. MUSTANG: a multiple structural alignment algorithm. AS Konagurthu JC Whisstock PJ Stuckey AM Lesk, Proteins 2006 64 559 74 10.1002/prot.20921 16736488
23. α distance comparison. O Carugo S Pongor, J Mol Biol 2002 315 887 98 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5250 11812155
24. Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals. P Rogen B Fain, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 119 124 12506205 10.1073/pnas.2636460100
25. Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison. ML Sierk WR Pearson, Protein Sci 2004 13 773 85 10.1110/ps.03328504 14978311
26. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. R Kolodny P Koehl M Levitt, J Mol Biol 2005 346 1173 88 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.032 15701525
27. Detecting local structural similarity in proteins by maximizing number of equivalent residues. DM Standley H Toh H Nakamura, Proteins 2004 57 381 91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.20211 10.1002/prot.20211 15340925
28. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Y Zhang J Skolnick, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 2302 9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gki524 15849316 10.1093/nar/gki524
29. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. E Krissinel K Henrick, Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004 60 2256 68 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904026460 10.1107/S0907444904026460 15572779
30. Protein structure alignment. W Taylor C Orengo, J Mol Biol 1989 208 1 22 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90084-3 2769748
31. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins. M Gerstein M Levitt, Protein Sci 1998 7 445 456 9521122
32. Use of non-crystallographic symmetry in protein structure refinement. G Kleywegt, Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996 52 842 57 10.1107/S0907444995016477 15299650
33. ASTRAL compendium enhancements. JM Chandonia NS Walker LL Conte P Koehl M Levitt SE Brenner, Nucleic Acids Res 2002 30 260 3 11752310 10.1093/nar/30.1.260
34. SISYPHUS-structural alignments for proteins with non-trivial relationships. A Andreeva A Prlic TJP Hubbard AG Murzin, Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 D253 D259 17068077 10.1093/nar/gkl746
35. SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data.ever. A Andreeva D Howorth SE Brenner TJP Hubbard C Chothia AG Murzin, Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 D226 9 14681400 10.1093/nar/gkh039
36. A normalized root-mean-square distance for comparing protein three-dimensional structures. O Carugo S Pongor, Protein Sci 2001 10 1470 3 10.1110/ps.690101 11420449
37. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. F Wilcoxon, Biometrics Bulletin 1945 1 80 83 10.2307/3001968
38. Classification. A Gordon, Chapman and Hall. London 2 1999
39. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. P Rousseeuw, J Comput Appl Math 1987 20 53 65 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
40. The structure and properties of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli suggest how folate ameliorates human hyperhomocysteinemia. BD Guenther CA Sheppard P Tran R Rozen RG Matthews ML Ludwig, Nat Struct Biol 1999 6 359 65 10.1038/7594 10201405
41. Structure of the proline dehydrogenase domain of the multifunctional PutA flavoprotein. YH Lee S Nadaraia D Gu DF Becker JJ Tanner, Nat Struct Biol 2003 10 109 14 10.1038/nsb885 12514740
42. Crystal structure of a bacterial signal peptidase in complex with a beta-lactam inhibitor. M Paetzel RE Dalbey NC Strynadka, Nature 1998 396 186 90 10.1038/25403 9823901
43. The structure of concanavalin a and its bound solvent determined with small-molecule accuracy at 0.94 a resolution. A Deacon T Gleichmann A Kalb H Price J Raftery G Bradbrook JYJ Helliwell, J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1997 93 4305 10.1039/a704140c
44. The structure of pea lectin-d-glucopyranose complex at a 1.9 a resolution. V Pletnev A Ruzheinikov I Tsygannik IM Yu W Duax D Ghosh W Pangborn, russian journal of 1997 23 469
45. The first structure of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase reveals the catalytic residues necessary for the two-fold oxidation. RE Campbell SC Mosimann I van De Rijn ME Tanner NC Strynadka, Biochemistry 2000 39 7012 23 10.1021/bi000181h 10841783
46. Crystal structure of GDP-mannose dehydrogenase: a key enzyme of alginate biosynthesis in P. aeruginosa. CF Snook PA Tipton LJ Beamer, Biochemistry 2003 42 4658 68 10.1021/bi027328k 12705829
47. Structure of an E6AP-UbcH7 complex: insights into ubiquitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade. L Huang E Kinnucan G Wang S Beaudenon PM Howley JM Huibregtse NP Pavletich, Science 1999 286 1321 6 10.1126/science.286.5443.1321 10558980
48. Conformational flexibility underlies ubiquitin ligation mediated by the WWP1 HECT domain E3 ligase. MA Verdecia CAP Joazeiro NJ Wells JL Ferrer ME Bowman T Hunter JP Noel, Mol Cell 2003 11 249 59 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00774-8 12535537
49. BAliBASE: a benchmark alignment database for the evaluation of multiple alignment programs. JD Thompson F Plewniak O Poch, Bioinformatics 1999 15 87 88 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.1.87 10068696
50. A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. JD Thompson F Plewniak O Poch, Nucleic Acids Res 1999 27 2682 2690 10373585 10.1093/nar/27.13.2682
51. Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs. T Lassmann ELL Sonnhammer, FEBS Lett 2002 529 126 30 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03189-7 12354624
52. MolMovDB: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility. N Echols D Milburn M Gerstein, Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31 478 82 12520056 10.1093/nar/gkg104
53. Identification of common molecular subsequences. TF Smith MS Waterman, J Mol Biol 1981 147 195 197 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90087-5 7265238
54. JAligner. 2006 http://jaligner.sourceforge.net/
55. FATCAT. http://fatcat.ljcrf.edu/fatcat/
56. MATRAS. http://biunit.naist.jp/matras/
57. C alpha-match. http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/c_alpha_match/
58. Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. A Shulman-Peleg R Nussinov HJ Wolfson, J Mol Biol 2004 339 607 33 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.012 15147845
59. The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. CT Porter GJ Bartlett JM Thornton, Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 D129 33 14681376 10.1093/nar/gkh028
60. Using a library of structural templates to recognise catalytic sites and explore their evolution in homologous families. JW Torrance GJ Bartlett CT Porter JM Thornton, J Mol Biol 2005 347 565 81 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.044 15755451
61. PDBsum more: new summaries and analyses of the known 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids. RA Laskowski VV Chistyakov JM Thornton, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 D266 8 15608193 10.1093/nar/gki001
62. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. GJ Kleywegt, J Mol Biol 1999 285 1887 97 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2393 9917419
63. Structure of the ABC ATPase domain of human TAP1, the transporter associated with antigen processing. R Faudet D Wiley, EMBO J 2001 20 17 4964 72 11532960 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4964
64. Structural characterization of the closed conformation of mouse guanylate kinase. N Sekulic L Shuvalova O Spangenberg M Konrad A Lavie, J Biol Chem 277 33 30236 43 2002, Aug 16 10.1074/jbc.M204668200 12036965
65. The UmuD' protein filament and its potential role in damage induced mutagenesis. TS Peat EG Frank JP McDonald AS Levine R Woodgate WA Hendrickson, Structure 1996 4 1401 12 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00148-7 8994967