Eu member states and the prodi commission;Les états membres de l'ue et la commission prodi

Revue Francaise de Science Politique

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 491-511

  Kassim, Hussein ^a   Menon, Anand ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649203389     PISSN: 00352950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/rfsp.534.0491     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. BANKS (M.), « Jury Still Out on Prodi at Half-Term », European Voice, 27, juin 2002, p. 8-25.
2. CAMERON (F.), SPENCE (D.), « The Commission-Council Tandem in the Foreign Policy Arena», dans D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), The Changing European Commission, Manchester, Manchester University Press, à paraître en 2003.
3. CHRISTIANSEN (T.), « The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform », Journal of Common Market Studies, 9 (1), 2002, p. 33-53.
4. CHRISTIANSEN (T.), « The European Commission: Administration in Turbulent Times », dans J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, Londres, Routledge, 2001a, p. 95-114.
5. CHRISTIANSEN (T.), « Intra-Institutional Politics and Inter-Institutional Relations in the EU: Towards Coherent Governance? », Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (5), 2001b, p. 747-769.
6. COMMITTEE OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS, First Report on Allegations Regarding Fraud, Mismanagement and Nepotism in the European Commission, 15 mars 1999a, .
7. COMMITTEE OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS, Second Report on Reform of the Commission. Analysis of Current Practice and Proposals for Tackling Mismanagement, Irregularities and Fraud, 10 septembre 1999b, .
8. CRAM (L.), « Calling the Tune without Paying the Piper? Social Policy Regulation: The Role of the Commission in European Community Social Policy », Politics and Policy, 21 (2), 1993, p. 135-146.
9. DEN BOER (M.), WALLACE (W.), « Justice and Home Affairs: Integration through Incrementalism? », dans H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 493-519.
10. DEVUYST (Y.), « The Community-Method after Amsterdam », Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1), 1999, p. 109-120.
11. DINAN (D.), Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 1999.
12. DOLEYS (Thomas J.), « Member States and the European Commission: Theoretical Insights from the New Economics of Organization », Journal of European Public Policy, 7 (4), 2000, p. 532-553.
13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, European Governance. A White Paper, COM (2001) 428, 25 juillet 2001, Bruxelles, 2001.
14. EUROPEAN C OMMISSION, Proposals for Reform of the Commission of the European Communities and its Services (the « Spierenburg Report »), Bruxelles, Commission of the European Communities, 1979.
15. EUROPEAN COUNCIL, Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000, Bruxelles, General Secretariat of the Council, 2000.
16. -Presidency Conclusions. Helsinki European Council 10 and 11 December 1999, Bruxelles, General Secretariat of the Council, 1999.
17. FALKNER (G.), « How Intergovernmental are Intergovernmental Conferences? An Example from the Maastricht Treaty Reform », Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (1), 2002, p. 98-119.
18. FALKNER (G.), NENTWICH (M.), « The Amsterdam Treaty: The Blueprint for the Future Institutional Balance », dans K. Neunreither, A. Wiener (eds), European Integration After Amsterdam, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 15-35.
19. FORSTER (A.), WALLACE (W.), « Common Foreign and Security Policy », dans H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 461-492.
20. HAYES-RENSHAW (F.), WALLACE (H.), The Council of Ministers, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 1997.
21. HIX (S.), « Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam », British Journal of Political Science, 32, 2002, p. 280-359.
22. HIX (S.), « Executive Selection in the European Union: Does the Commission President Investiture Procedure Reduce the Democratic Deficit? », dans K. Neunreither, A. Wiener (eds), European Integration After Amsterdam, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 95-111. Les états membres de l'UE et la Commission Prodi
23. HODSON (D.), MAHER (I.), « The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination », Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (4), 2001, p. 719-746.
24. JABKO (N.), « In the Name of the Market: How the European Commission Paved the Way for Monetary Union », Journal of European Public Policy, 6 (3), 1999, p. 475-495.
25. JONESV (E.), The Politics of economic and monetary union, maryland, rowman and littlefield, 2002.
26. KASSIM (H.), « An Historic Accomplishment? The Prodi Commission and Administrative Reform », dans D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), The Changing European Commission, Manchester, Manchester University Press, à paraître en 2003.
27. KASSIM (H.), PETERS (B. G.), « Conclusion: Coordinating National Action in Brussels-A Comparative Perspective », dans H. Kassim, A. Menon, B. G. Peters, V. Wright (eds), The National Coordination of European Policy. The European Level, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 297-342.
28. KASSIM (H.), MENON (A.), PETERS (B. G.), WRIGHT (V.) eds, The National Coordination of European Policy. The European Level Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
29. KASSIM (H.), WRIGHT (V.), « The Role of National Administrations in the Decision-Making Processes of the European Community », Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, 41 (3), 1991, p. 832-850.
30. KOSTAKOPOULOU (D.), « The "Protective Union": Change and Continuity in Migration Law and Policy in Post-Amsterdam Europe », Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (3), 2000, p. 497-518.
31. KREHER (A.), « Agencies in the European Community: A Step Towards Administrative Integration in Europe », Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (2), 1997, p. 225-245.
32. MAJONE (G.), « The Politics of Regulation and European Regulatory Institutions », dans J. Hayward, A. Menon (eds), Governing Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 297-312.
33. -« The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization », Governance, 15 (3), 2002, p. 375-392.
34. MATLARY (J. H.), « The Role of the Commission: A Theoretical Discussion », dans N. Nugent (ed.), At the Heart of the Union. Studies of the European Commission, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1997.
35. MENON (A.), « Member States and International Institutions: Institutionalizing Intergovernmentalism in the European Union », Contemporary European Politics, 1, 2003a, p. 1-31.
36. -« Towards an Effective CFSP: Institutional Proposals », Notre Europe, 2003b, .
37. MENON (A.), WEATHERILL (S.), « Legitimacy, Accountability and Delegation in the European Union », dans A. Arnull, D. Wincott (eds), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 113-131.
38. METCALFE (L.), « Reforming the Commission: Will Organizational Efficiency Produce Effective Governance? », Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (5), 2000, p. 817-841.
39. MEUNIER (S.), NICOLAÍOU (C.), « who speaks for europe? the delegation of trade authority in the eu », Journal of common market studies, 37 (3), 1999, p. 477-501.
40. MORAVCSIK (A.), The Choice for Europe, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1998.
41. -« Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach », Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4), 1993, p. 473-524.
42. MORAVCSIK (A.), NICOLAïDES (C.), « Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions », Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1), 1999, p. 59-85.
43. -« Keynote Article: Federal Ideals and Constitutional Realities in the Treaty of Amsterdam », Journal of Common Market Studies, 36, Annual Review, 1998, p. 13-38.
44. PARKER (G.), « The Two Romano Prodis: The Tactless, Ineffectual Commission President and the Respected Italian Statesman », Financial Times, 23 décembre 2002a, p. 15.
45. PARKER (G.), « Prodi Loses Colleagues Support After Secret Plan », Financial Times, 11 décembre 2002b, p. 4.
46. PETERSON (J.), « The Prodi Commission: Fresh Start or Free Fall? », dans D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), The Changing European Commission, Manchester, Manchester University Press, à paraître en 2003.
47. PETERSON (J.), BOMBERG (E.), Decision-Making in the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1999.
48. POLLACK (M. A.), « The End of Creeping Competence? EU Policy-Making Since Maastricht », Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (3), 2000, p. 519-538.
49. -« Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the European Community », International Organization, 51 (1), 1997, p. 99-134.
50. -« The New Institutionalism and EU Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutionalist Analysis », Governance, 9 (4), 1996, p. 429-458. ROSS (G.), Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995.
51. SOETENDORP (B.), ANDEWEG (R.), « Dual Loyalties: The Dutch Permanent Representation to the European Union », dans H. Kassim, A. Menon, B. G. Peters, V. Wright (eds), The National Coordination of EU Policy: The European Level, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 211-228.
52. TSOUKALIS (L.), « Economic and Monetary Union », dans H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds), Policy Making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 149-178.
53. WALLACE (H.), « The Institutional Setting », dans H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 3-39.
54. WESSELS (W.), « Nice Results: The Millennium IGC in the EU's Evolution », Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (2), 2001, p. 197-219.
55. WINCOTT (D.), « Looking Forward or Harking Back? The Commission and the Reform of Governance in the European Union », Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (5), 2001, p. 897-911.
56. WRIGHT (V.), « The National Co-ordination of European Policy-making: Negotiating the Quagmire », dans J. Richardson (ed.), European Union Power and Policy-Making, Londres, Routledge, 1997, p. 148-169.