Surface nanofeature effects on titanium-adherent human mesenchymal stem cells

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 38-46

  Valencia, Sara ^a   Gretzer, Christina ^b   Cooper, Lyndon R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Astra Tech AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Human mesenchymal stem cell; Key words commercially pure titanium; Nanotopog raphy; Osteoinduction; Real time polymerase chain reaction

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; NANOMATERIAL; RUNX2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; SCLEROPROTEIN; SMAD PROTEIN; SOMATOMEDIN B; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2;

ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MATRIX; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BONE MATRIX; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CORE BINDING FACTOR ALPHA 1 SUBUNIT; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL MATERIALS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR II; INTERFEROMETRY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; SMAD PROTEINS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 67649173039     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prostho- dont 2004;17:536-543.
2. Ivanoff CJ,Hallgren QWidmarkG, Sennerby L,Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO(2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-134.
3. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J.The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:35-42.
4. Reyes CD, PetrieTA, Burns KL, Schwartz Z, Garcia AJ. Biomolec- ular surface coating to enhance orthopaedic tissue healing and integration. Biomaterials 2007;28:3228-3235.
5. Schliephake H, Aref A, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Roessler S, Sewing A. Effect of immobilized bone morphogenic protein 2 coating of titanium implants on peri-implant bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:563-569.
6. Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials 2006;28:354-369.
7. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005;26:1837-1847.
8. Park GE, Webster TJ. A review of nanotechnology for the development of better orthopedic implants. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2005;1:18-29.
9. Sato M, Webster TJ.Nanobiotechnology: Implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications [review]. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004;1:105-114.
10. de Oliveira PT,Nanci A.Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteo- pontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:403-413.
11. Schopper CMoser D, Goriwoda W, et al.The effect of three different calcium phosphate implant coatings on bone deposition and coating resorption: A long-term histological study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:357-368.
12. Okada M, Furuzono T. Nano-sized ceramic particles of hydrox- yapatite calcined with an anti-sintering agent.J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2007;7:848-851.
13. Kobayashi T, Itoh S, Nakamura S, Nakamura M, Shinomiya K, Yamashita K. Enhanced bone bonding of hydroxyapatite- coated titanium implants by electrical polarization. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;82:145-151.
14. Sato M, Aslani A, Sambito MA, Kalkhoran NM, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ.Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite/titania coatings on titanium improves osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:265-272.
15. Orsini G, Piattelli M, Scarano A, et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2007;78:209-218.
16. Sul YT, Byon ES, Jeong Y. Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: Effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:101-110.
17. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:349-359.
18. Berglundh T.Abrahamsson l, Albouy JP,Lindhe J. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:147-152.
19. Cooper LF, Zhou Y.Takebe J, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation atT102 grit- blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27:926-936.
20. Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:650-656.
21. Pesskova V, Kubies D, Hulejova H, Himmlova L.The influence of implant surface properties on cell adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:465-473.
22. Gretzer C, Emanuelsson L, Liljensten E,Thomsen P. The inflammatory cell influx and cytokines changes during transition from acute inflammation to fibrous repair around implanted materials.J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006;17:669-687.
23. Buser D,Broggini N.Wieland M,et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
24. Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE, Caplan Al, Bruder SP. Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Cell Biochem 1997;64:295-312.
25. Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, et al.The Development of Methods for Characterisation of Roughness in Three Dimensions. University of Birmingham: EUR 15178 EN of Commission of the European Communities, 1993.
26. Wang K,Yamamoto H, Chin JR,WerbZ,Vu TH. Epidermal growth factor receptor-deficient mice have delayed primary endochondral ossification because of defective osteoclast recruitment.) Biol Chem 2004;279:53484-153456
27. Nanes MS.Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: Molecular and cellular mechanisms in skeletal pathology [review]. Gene 2003;321:1-15.
28. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 2006,27:1306-1315.
29. Oliveira PT, Zalzal SF, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, Nanci A. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography.J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:554-564.
30. Isa ZM, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford CM. Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:203-211.
31. Luu HH, Song WX, Luo X, et al. Distinct roles of bone morpho- genetic proteins in osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 2007;25:665-677.
32. Friedman MS, Long MW, Hankenson KD. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells is regulated by bone morphogenetic protein-6.J Cell Biochem 2006;98:538-554.
33. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al.Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast- like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85.
34. Guo J, Padilla RJ, Ambrose W, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF.The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of Ti02 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2007,28:5418-5425.