Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans

American Journal of Human Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 365-370

  Allaway, Heather C ^a   Bloski, Terri G ^a   Pierson, Roger A ^a   Lujan, Marla E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRINTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; ANTHROPOMETRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANTHROPOMETRY; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 67449168335     PISSN: 10420533     EISSN: 15206300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20892     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbott DH, Padmanabhan V, Dumesic DA. 2006. Contributions of androgen and estrogen to fetal programming of ovarian dysfunction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 4:17.
2. Bailey AA, Hurd PL. 2005. Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Biol Psychol 68:215-222.
3. Bloski TG, Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Pierson RA. 2008. Digit ratios as anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 26-29 [Abstract], p 65.
4. Brown WM, Finn CJ, Cooke BM, Breedlove SM. 2002. Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified "butch" and "femme" lesbians. Arch Sex Behav 31:123-127.
5. Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. 2007. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch Sex Behav 36:377-384.
6. Burton LA, Henninger D, Hafetz J. 2005. Gender differences in relations of mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios as hormonal indexes. Dev Neuropsychol 28:493-505.
7. Caswell N, Manning JT. 2009. A comparison of finger 2D:4D by self-report direct measurement and experimenter measurement from photocopy: methodological issues. Arch Sex Behav 38:143-148.
8. Cattrall FR, Vollenhoven BJ, Weston GC. 2005. Anatomical evidence for in utero androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 84:1689-1692.
9. Cohen-Bendahan CC, van de Beek C, Berenbaum SA. 2005. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: methods and findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:353-384.
10. de Bruin EI, Verheij F, Wiegman T, Ferdinand RF. 2006. Differences in finger length ratio between males with autism, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified, ADHD, and anxiety disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol 48:962-965.
11. Fink B, Manning J, Neave N. 2004. Second to fourth digit ratio and the 'big five' personality factors. Pers Individ Differ 37:495-503.
12. Fink B, Neave N, Laughton K, Manning J. 2006. Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Pers Individ Differ 41:1253-1262.
13. Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT. 2003. Second to fourth digit ratio, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-chest ratio: their relationships in heterosexual men and women. Ann Hum Biol 30:728-738.
14. Hall LS, Love CT. 2003. Finger-length ratios in female monozygotic twins discordant for sexual orientation. Arch Sex Behav 32:23-28.
15. Hampson E, Ellis CL, Tenk CM. 2008. On the relation between 2D:4D and sex-dimorphic personality traits. Arch Sex Behav 37:133-144.
16. Honekopp J, Manning JT, Muller C. 2006a. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Horm Behav 49:545-549.
17. Honekopp J, Voracek M, Manning JT. 2006b. 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of sex partners: evidence for effects of prenatal testosterone in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:30-37.
18. Kemper CJ, Schwerdtfeger A. Comparing indirect methods of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurement. Am J Hum Biol (in press).
19. Kraemer B, Noll T, Delsignore A, Milos G, Schnyder U, Hepp U. 2006. Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and dimensions of sexual orientation. Neuropsychobiology 53:210-214.
20. Lippa RA. 2003. Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:179-188.
21. Lippa RA. 2006. Finger lengths, 2D:4D ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the Big Five. Biol Psychol 71:116-121.
22. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT. 2004. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum Dev 77:23-28.
23. Manikkam M, Crespi EJ, Doop DD, Herkimer C, Lee JS, Yu S, Brown MB, Foster DL, Padmanabhan V. 2004. Fetal programming: Prenatal testosterone excess leads to fetal growth retardation and postnatal catch-up growth in sheep. Endocrinology 145:790-798.
24. Manning JT, Bundred PE. 2000. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a new predictor of disease predisposition? Med Hypotheses 54:855-857.
25. Manning JT, Fink B, Neave N, Caswell N. 2005. Photocopies yield lower digit ratios (2D:4D) than direct finger measurements. Arch Sex Behav 34:329-333.
26. Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. 1998. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod 13:3000-3004.
27. McFadden D, Shubel E. 2002. Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Horm Behav 42:492-500.
28. McIntyre MH. 2006. The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 4:10.
29. McIntyre MH, Cohn BA, Ellison PT. 2006. Sex dimorphism in digital formulae of children. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:143-150.
30. McIntyre MH, Ellison PT, Lieberman DE, Demerath E, Towne B. 2005. The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proc Biol Sci 272:1473-1479.
31. Millet K, Dewitte S. 2007. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of an aggressive music video on aggression. Pers Individ Differ 43:289-294.
32. Millet K, Dewitte S. 2009. The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game. Br J Psychol 100:151-162.
33. Nicholls ME, Orr CA, Yates MJ, Loftus AM. 2008. A new means of measuring index/ring finger (2D:4D) ratio and its association with gender and hand preference. Laterality 13:71-91.
34. Paul SN, Kato BS, Hunkin JL, Vivekanandan S, Spector TD. 2006. The big finger: the second to fourth digit ratio is a predictor of sporting ability in women. Br J Sports Med 40:981-983.
35. Pokrywka L, Rachon D, Sucheka-Rachon K, Bitel L. 2005. The second to fourth digit ratio in elite and non-elite female athletes. Am J Hum Biol 17:796-800.
36. Robertson J, Zhang W, Liu JJ, Muir KR, Maciewicz RA, Doherty M. 2008. Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. J Anat 212:42-48.
37. Robinson J. 2006. Prenatal programming of the female reproductive neuroendocrine system by androgens. Reproduction 132:539-547.
38. Robinson SJ, Manning JT. 2000. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and male homosexuality. Evol Hum Behav 21:333-345.
39. Ryan BC, Vandenbergh JG. 2002. Intrauterine position effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:665-678.
40. Scutt D, Manning JT. 1996. Symmetry and ovulation in women. Hum Reprod 11:2477-2480.
41. van Anders SM, Hampson E. 2005. Testing the prenatal androgen hypothesis: Measuring digit ratios, sexual orientation, and spatial abilities in adults. Horm Behav 47:92-98.
42. Van den Bergh B, Dewitte S. 2006. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Proc Biol Sci 273:2091-2095.
43. Voracek M, Dressler SG. 2006. High (feminized) digit ratio (2D:4D) in Danish men: a question of measurement method? Hum Reprod 21:1329-1331; author reply 1331-1332.
44. Voracek M, Manning JT, Dressler SG. 2007. Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts. Am J Hum Biol 19:142-146.
45. Voracek M, Manning JT, Ponocny I. 2005. Digit ratio (2D:4D) in homosexual and heterosexual men from Austria. Arch Sex Behav 34:335-340.
46. Williams JH, Greenhalgh KD, Manning JT. 2003. Second to fourth finger ratio and possible precursors of developmental psychopathology in preschool children. Early Hum Dev 72:57-65.
47. Williams TJ, Pepitone ME, Christensen SE, Cooke BM, Huberman AD, Breedlove NJ, Breedlove TJ, Jordan CL, Breedlove SM. 2000. Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature 404:455-456.