Patient selection for automated peritoneal dialysis: For whom, when?

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2009, Pages

  Liakopoulos, Vassilios ^a   Dombros, Nicholas ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^c NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

APD; High transporters; Indications; Patient preference; Patient selection

Indexed keywords

SODIUM;

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; EMERGENCY CARE; HERNIA; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY DISEASE; LIFESTYLE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME; SLEEP DISORDER; SLEEP PATTERN; TREATMENT INDICATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REVIEW; STANDARD;

AUTOMATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 67449101701     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080902902s19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases. USRDS 2007 annual data report. Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda: United States Renal Data System; 2007.
2. European Renal Association (ERA) and European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) Registry. ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2006. Amsterdam: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; 2008. [Available online at: www.era-edta-reg.org/files/annualreports/pdf/ AnnRep2006.pdf; accessed 21 November 2008]
3. Verger C, Ryckelynck JP, Duman M, Veniez G, Lobbedez T, Boulanger E, et al. French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF): outline and main results. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; (103):S12-20.
4. Badve SV, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, Mudge DW, Rosman JB, Brown FG, et al. Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes. Kidney Int 2008; 73:480-8.
5. Li PK, Lui SL, Leung CB, Yu AW, Lee E, Just PM, et al. Increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis to cope with mounting demand for renal replacement therapy - perspectives from Asian countries. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27(Suppl 2):S59-61.
6. Tang SC, Lai KN. Does automated peritoneal dialysis provide better outcomes than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis? Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2007; 3:596-7.
7. Blake PG. Cycling forward. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26:306-8.
8. Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M, Gokal R, Heimbürger O, Krediet R, et al. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 6 Automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20(Suppl 9):ix21-3.
9. Mujais S, Nolph K, Gokal R, Blake P, Burkart J, Coles G, et al. Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20(Suppl 4):S5-21.
10. Chung SH, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B. Poor outcomes for fast transporters on PD: the rise and fall of a clinical concern. Semin Dial 2008; 21:7-10.
11. Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Nolph KD, Keshaviah PR, Oreopoulos DG, Pagé D. Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada-U.S.A. (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9:1285-92.
12. Davies SJ, Phillips L, Russell GI. Peritoneal solute transport predicts survival on CAPD independently of residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:962-8.
13. Rumpsfeld M, McDonald SP, Johnson DW. Higher peritoneal transport status is associated with higher mortality and technique failure in the Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patient populations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:271-8.
14. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford P, Meeus F, Borras M, Riegel W, et al. on behalf of the EAPOS Group. Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:2948-57.
15. Yang X, Fang W, Bargman JM, Oreopoulos DG. High peritoneal permeability is not associated with higher mortality or technique failure in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28:82-92.
16. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2003; (88):S3-12.
17. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the U.S.: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; (103):S21-6.
18. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, Daly C, Vale L, Macleod AM. Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:2991-8.
19. Wilson J, Nissenson AR. Determinants in APD selection. Semin Dial 2002; 15:388-92.
20. Tomo T, Okabe E, Matsuyama K, Iwashita T, Yufu K, Nasu M. The effect of peritoneal rest in combination therapy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: using the cultured human peritoneal mesothelial cell model. J Artif Organs 2005; 8:125-9.
21. Huang JW, Hung KY, Yen CJ, Wu KD, Tsai TJ. Comparison of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis patients using either a twin-bag system or automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:604-7.
22. Ghahramani N, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Infection rates in end-stage renal disease patients treated with CCPD and CAPD using the UltraBag system. Adv Perit Dial 1995; 11:164-7.
23. Basile C, De Padova F. Comparison of peritonitis incidence in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1957-8.
24. Troidle LK, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Continuous cycler therapy, manual peritoneal dialysis therapy, and peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial 1998; 14:137-41.
25. Rodríguez-Carmona A, Pérez Fontán M, García Falcón T, Fernández Rivera C, Valdés F. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19: 253-8.
26. Locatelli AJ, Marcos GM, Gómez MG, Alvarez SA, DeBenedetti LC. Comparing peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients versus automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial 1999; 15:193-6.
27. Sanchez AR, Madonia C, Rascon-Pacheco RA. Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a Mexican PD center. Kidney Int Suppl 2008; (108): S76-80.
28. de Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ, van der Meulen J, Verbrugh HA, Verhoef J, et al. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 264-71.
29. Nessim SJ, Bargman JM. Occurrence of peritonitis in APD versus CAPD: methodologic problems. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:1769-70.
30. Clinical practice recommendations for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48(Suppl 1):S130-58.
31. Raj DS. Role of APD in compliance with therapy. Semin Dial 2002; 15:434-6.
32. Bernardini J, Nagy M, Piraino B. Pattern of noncompliance with dialysis exchanges in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35:1104-10.
33. Caruana RJ, Smith KL, Hess CP, Perez JC, Cheek PL. Dialysate dumping: a novel cause of inadequate dialysis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Perit Dial Int 1989; 9:319-20.
34. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Pérez-Fontán M, Garca-Naveiro R, Villaverde P, Peteiro J. Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44:132-45.
35. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Heimbürger O, Meeus F, Mellotte G, Rosman J, et al. on behalf of the European Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes Study (EAPOS) Investigators. Adequacy targets can be met in anuric patients by automated peritoneal dialysis: baseline data from EAPOS. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21(Suppl 3):S133-7.
36. Boudville NC, Cordy P, Millman K, Fairbairn L, Sharma A, Lindsay R, et al. Blood pressure, volume, and sodium control in an automated peritoneal dialysis population. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27:537-43.
37. Brunkhorst RR. Individualized PD prescription: APD versus CAPD. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25(Suppl 3):S92-4.
38. Marrón B, Remón C, Pérez-Fontán M, Quirós P, Ortíz A. Benefits of preserving residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl 2008; (108):S42-51.
39. de Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT, de Charro FT. A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:306-12.
40. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H, et al. A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19:526-33.
41. Sunder S, Kalra OP, Nashine S, Waghmare V, Ruchi R. Comparative study of adequacy of dialysis and health-related quality of life in patients on CAPD and APD. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28:542-4.
42. Tang SC, Lam B, Ku PP, Leung WS, Chu CM, Ho YW, et al. Alleviation of sleep apnea in patients with chronic renal failure by nocturnal cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis compared with conventional continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2607-16.
43. Blake PG. Advantages and disadvantages of automated peritoneal dialysis compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19(Suppl 2): S121-4.
44. Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. Assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) for the functionally dependent and elderly patient. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25(Suppl 3):S60-3.
45. Verrina E, Edefonti A, Gianoglio B, Rinaldi S, Sorino P, Zacchello G, et al. A multicenter experience on patient and technique survival in children on chronic dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2004; 19:82-90.
46. Oreopoulos D, Thodis E, Paraskevas KI. The promising future of long-term peritoneal dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40:405-10.
47. Kadambi P, Troidle L, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. APD in the elderly. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 430-3.
48. Fine RN, Ho M. The role of APD in the management of pediatric patients: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 427-29.
49. Fabian Velasco R, Lagunas Muñoz J, Sanchez Saavedra V, Mena Brito Trejo JE, Qureshi AR, García-López E, et al. Automated peritoneal dialysis as the modality of choice: a single-center, 3-year experience with 458 children in Mexico. Pediatr Nephrol 2008; 23:465-71.
50. Chiu MC, Ng CF, Lee LP, Lai WM, Lau SC. Automated peritoneal dialysis in children and adolescents - benefits: a survey of patients and parents on health-related quality of life. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27(Suppl 2):S138-42.
51. Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. How to start the late referred ESRD patient urgently on chronic APD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21(Suppl 2):ii56-9.
52. Lobbedez T, Lecouf A, Ficheux M, Henri P, de Ligny BH, Ryckelynck JP. Is rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis feasible in unplanned dialysis patients? A single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:3290-4
53. Ilabaca-Avendaño MB, Yarza-Solorzáno G, Rodriguez-Valenzuela J, Arcinas-Fausto G, Ramírez-Hernandez V, Hernández-Hernández DA, et al. Automated peritoneal dialysis as a lifesaving therapy in an emergency room: report of four cases. Kidney Int Suppl 2008; (108):S173-6.
54. Szabo E, Moody H, Hamilton T, Ang C, Kovithavongs C, Kjellstrand C. Choice of treatment improves quality of life. A study on patients undergoing dialysis. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:1352-6.