Biomechanical evaluation of porous biodegradable scaffolds for revision knee arthroplasty

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 333-339

  Terrier, Alexandre ^a   Sedighi Gilani, Marjan ^a   Ghias, Alireza Roshan ^a   Aschwanden, Line ^a   Pioletti, Dominique P ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bone scaffold; Knee; Prosthesis; Revision arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOMECHANICS; EVALUATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; POROSITY; REOPERATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POROSITY; REOPERATION; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 67449088792     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840802603589     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bourne RB, Finlay JB. 1986. The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (208):95-99.
2. Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N. 1999. Allograft bone. The influence of processing on safety and performance. Orthop Clin North Am. 30(4):571-581.
3. Bugbee WD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. 2001. Does implant selection affect outcome of revision knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 16(5):581-585.
4. Completo A, Fonseca F, Simoes JA. 2007. Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia. J Biomech Eng. 129(5):791-797.
5. Completo A, Simoes JA, Fonseca F, Oliveira M. 2008. The influence of different tibial stem designs in load sharing and stability at the cement-bone interface in revision TKA. Knee 15(3):227-232.
6. Duty AO, Oest ME, Guldberg RE. 2007. Cyclic mechanical compression increases mineralization of cell-seeded polymer scaffolds in vivo. J Biomech Eng. 129(4):531-539.
7. Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA. 2005. Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 20(1):35-41.
8. Huff TW, Sculco TP. 2007. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(7):32-36.
9. Hurwitz DE, Sumner DR, Andriacchi TP, Sugar DA. 1998. Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. J Biomech. 31(5):423-430.
10. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA. 2001. The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16(6):759-767.
11. Kim YH, Kwon OS, Kim KK. 2008. Analysis of biomechanical effect of stem-end design in revision TKA using digital Korean model. Clin Biomech. 23(7):853-858.
12. Mabry TM, Hanssen AD. 2007. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(4 Suppl 1):56-60.
13. Mathieu L. 2004. Processing of porous polymer composites for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci, Lausanne, EPFL. PhD.
14. Mathieu LM, Mueller TL, Bourban PE, Pioletti DP, Muller R, Manson JA. 2006. Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(6):905-916.
15. Montjovent MO, Mathieu L, Hinz B, Applegate LL, Bourban PE, Zambelli PY, Manson JA, Pioletti DP. 2005. Biocompatibility of bioresorbable poly(L-lactic acid) composite scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming with human fetal bone cells. Tissue Eng. 11(11-12):1640-1649.
16. Montjovent MO, Mathieu L, Schmoekel H, Mark S, Bourban PE, Zambelli PY, Laurent-Applegate LA, Pioletti DP. 2007. Repair of critical size defects in the rat cranium using ceramic-reinforced PLA scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res A. 83A:41-51.
17. Mow CS, Wiedel JD. 1996. Structural allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(3):235-241.
18. Reilly D, Walker PS, Ben-Dov M, Ewald FC. 1982. Effects of tibial components on load transfer in the upper tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 165:273-282.
19. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. 1995. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys. 17(5):347-355.
20. Stevens MM, Marini RP, Schaefer D, Aronson J, Langer R, Shastri VP. 2005. In vivo engineering of organs: the bone bioreactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(32):11450-11455.
21. Stockley I, McAuley JP, Gross AE. 1992. Allograft reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 74(3):393-397.
22. Su DH, Chan CW, Seow KH, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Tay BK, Tan SK. 2000. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Singapore Med J. 41(1):6-8.
23. Wood MA, Yang Y, Thomas PB, Haj AJ. 2006. Using dihydropyridine-release strategies to enhance load effects in engineered human bone constructs. Tissue Eng. 12(9):2489-2497.
24. Yaszemski MJ, Payne RG, Hayes WC, Langer R, Mikos AG. 1996. In vitro degradation of a poly(propylene fumarate)-based composite material. Biomaterials 17(22): 2127-2130.
25. van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N, Buma P, van der Aa AJ, Huiskes R. 1999. Morsellized bone grafting compensates for femoral bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. An experimental study. Biomaterials 20(1): 85-89.