A model to evaluate the consequences of GM and non-GM segregation scenarios on GM crop placement in the landscape and cross-pollination risk management

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 101, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 49-56

  Coleno F C ^a   Angevin, F ^b   Lecroart B ^b  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b INRA   (France)

Author keywords

Co existence; Decision model; Farming system; GMO; Landscape

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROP IMPROVEMENT; FARMING SYSTEM; GENE FLOW; MAIZE; MODELING; POLLINATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSGENIC PLANT; WEATHER;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 67349278807     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Angevin, F., Colbach N., Meynard, J.M., Roturier, C., 2002. Analysis of necessary adjustements of farming practices. In: Bock, A.-K., Lheureux, K., Libeau-Dulos, M., Nilsagard, H., Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. (Eds.), Scenarios for Co-existence of Genetically Modified, Conventional and Organic Crops in European Agriculture. Technical Report Series of the Joint Research Center of the European Commission. EUR 20394 EN.
2. Angevin F., Klein E.K., Choimet C., Gauffreteau A., Lavigne C., Messéan A., and Meynard J.M. Modelling impacts of cropping systems and climate on maize cross-pollination in agricultural landscapes: the MAPOD model. European Journal of Agronomy 28 (2008) 471-484
3. Bateman A.J. Contamination in seed crops I: insect pollination. Journal of Genetics 48 (1947) 257-275
4. Bateman A.J. Contamination in seed crops II: wind pollination. Heredity I (1947) 235-246
5. Beckmann V., Soregaroli C., and Wesseler J. Co-existence rules and regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 (2006) 1193-1199
6. Betbesé I., and Lucas J.A. Varietats de panís. Dossier Tècnic (2006), Ruralcat p. 24
7. Bourguet B., Desquilbet M., and Lemarié S. Regulating insect resistance management: the case of non-Bt corn refuges in the US. Journal of Environmental Management 76 (2005) 210-220
8. Brookes, G., 2002. The farm level impact of using Bt maize in Spain. PGEecnomics, p. 23. .
9. Bullock D.S., and Desquilbet M. The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation. Food Policy 27 (2002) 81-99
10. Byrne P.F., and Fromherz S. Can GM and non-GM crops coexist? Setting a Precedent in Boulder County, Colorado, USA. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 1 (2003) 258-261
11. Colbach N., Clermont-Dauphin C., and Meynard J.M. GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. II. Genetic exchanges among volunteer and cropped populations in a small region. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 83 (2001) 255-270
12. Coléno, F.C., 2008a. A simulation model to evaluate the consequences of GM and non-GM segregation rules on landscape organization. Journal of International Farm management 4. ().
13. Coléno F.C. Simulation and evaluation of GM and non-GM segregation management strategies among European grain merchants. Journal of Food Engineering 88 (2008) 306-314
14. Comité National du Transport, 2006. Simulateur de Prix de Revient Transport Régionaux ().
15. Demont M., Daems W., Dillen K., Mathijs E., Sausse C., and Tollens E. Regulating co-existence in Europe: beware of the domino-effect!. Ecological Economics 64 (2008) 683-689
16. Derieux M., and Bonhomme R. Heat unit requirements for maize hybrids in Europe. Results of the European FAO sub-network. I. Sowing-silking period. Maydica 27 (1982) 59-77
17. Derieux M., and Bonhomme R. Heat units requirements of maize inbred lines for pollen shedding and silking: results of the European FAO network. Maydica 35 (1990) 41-46
18. Devos Y., Reheul D., Thas O., De Clercq E.M., Cougnon M., and Cordemans K. Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 27 (2007) 155-165
19. Durand R. Signification et portée des sommes de températures. Bulletin Technical Information 238 (1969) 185-190
20. European Commission, 2003a. Commission recommendations of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, 2003/556/EC (notified under document number C(2003) 2624), pp. 36-47. Official Journal of the European Union, 29/07/2003, vol. 46, p. L189.
21. European Commission, 2003b. Regulation (EC) No 1829 / 2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically food and feed, pp. 1-23. Official Journal of the European Union, 18/10/2003, vol. 46, p. L268.
22. European Commission, 2003c. Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 03 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC, pp. 24-28. Official Journal of the European Union, L268, 18/10/2003, vol. 46, p. L268.
23. Eurobarometer, 2006. Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends. European Commission's Directorate General for Research, Eurobarometer 64.3, p. 85.
24. Furtan W.H., Güzel A., and Weseen A.S. Landscape clubs: co-existence of genetically modified and organic crops. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 55 (2007) 185-195
25. Halsey M.E., Remund K.M., Davis C.A., Qualls M., Eppard P.J., and Berberich S.A. Isolation of maize from pollen-mediated gene flow by time and distance. Crop Science 45 (2005) 2172-2185
26. James, C., 2006. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006. ISAAA Brief No. 35. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.
27. Jank B., Rath J., and Gaugitsch H. Co-existence of agricultural production systems. Trends in Biotechnology 24 (2006) 198-200
28. Jones J.M., and Brooks J.S. Effectiveness and distance of border rows in preventing outcrossing in corn. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin T-38 (1950) 1-18
29. Klein E.K., Lavigne C., Foueillassar X., Gouyon P.H., and Laredo C. Corn pollen dispersal: quasi-mechanistic models and field experiments. Ecological Monographs 73 (2003) 131-150
30. Levidow L., Carr S., and Wield D. Gentically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities. Journal of Risk Research 3 (2000) 189-208
31. Lüthy J. Detection strategies for food authenticity and genetically modified foods. Food Control 10 (1999) 259-361
32. Messéan, A., Angevin, F., Gómez-Barbero, M., Menrad, K., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., 2006. New case studies on the co-existence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Technical Report Series of the Joint Research Center of the European Commission, EUR 22102 En, p. 112.
33. Meynard, J. M., Le Bail, M., 2001. Isolement des collectes et maîtrise des disséminations au champ. Rapport du Groupe 3 du Programme de Recherche Pertinence Économique et Faisabilité d'une Filière Sans Utilisation d'OGM. INRA - FNSEA, p. 56.
34. Miraglia M., Berdal K.G., Brera C., Corbisier P., Holst-Jensen A., Kok E.J., Marvin H.J.P., Schimmel H., Rentsch J., Van Rie J.P.P.F., and Zagon J. Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. Food and Chemical Toxicology 42 (2004) 1157-1180
35. Nalebuff B.J., and Brandenburger A.M. Co-opetition (2002), Proflebooks, London p. 275
36. Raveneau, A., 2005. Stratégies de séparation des filières OGM et non OGM en amont de la chaîne logistique d'approvisionnement. Mémoire de fin d'étude de l'ENESAD, p. 33.
37. Raynor G.S., Ogden E.C., and Hayes J.V. Dispersion and deposition of corn pollen from experimental sources. Agronomy Journal 64 (1972) 420-427
38. Scipioni A., Saccarola G., Arena F., and Alberto S. Strategies to assure the absence of GMO in food products application process in a confectionery firm. Food Control 16 (2005) 569-578