A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus (DanPASS)

Speech Communication

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 594-603

  Grønnum, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Corpus; Dialogue; Monologue; Phonetic notation; Prosodic labeling; Spontaneous speech

Indexed keywords

CORPUS; DIALOGUE; MONOLOGUE; PHONETIC NOTATION; PROSODIC LABELING; SPONTANEOUS SPEECH;

LABELING; LINGUISTICS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 67349252831     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson A.H., Bader M., Bard E.G., Boyle E., Doherty G., Garrod S., Isard S., Kowtko J., McAllister J., Miller J., Sotillo C., Thompson H.S., and Weinert R. The HCRC map task corpus. Lang. Speech 34 (1991) 351-366. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/maptask/ See also
2. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Internat. 5 9/10 (2001) 341-345
3. Boersma, P., Weenink, D., 2006. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.30) [Computer program] (accessed 28.08.06.).
4. Brown G., Anderson A., Shillcock R., and Yule G. Teaching Talk (1984), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Dau, T., Christiansen, T.U., 2007. Byggestene i spontant talt dansk akustisk og perceptuelt. In: Kyhn, G. (Ed.), Carlsbergfondet, Årsskrift, pp. 44-49.
6. Dyrby, M., Vinther, Lydiksen, E., Kristensen, L., Burholt, Rørvig, K., 2005. Prosodi i underordnede sætninger i dansk talesprog. Power-point presentation at a meeting in the ProGram circle, November 11, 2005.
7. Fletcher J., Sterling L., Mushin I., and Wales R. Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Lang. Speech 45 (2002) 229-253
8. Grønnum N. Intonation and text in standard Danish. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 77 (1985) 1205-1216
9. Grønnum N. Sentence intonation in textual context - supplementary data. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 80 (1986) 1040-1047
10. Grønnum N. Prosodic parameters in a variety of regional Danish standard languages, with a view towards Swedish and German. Phonetica 47 (1990) 182-214
11. Grønnum N. Superposition and subordination in intonation - a nonlinear approach. In: Elenius K., and Branderud P. (Eds). Proc. XIIIth Internat. Congress Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm 1995 Vol. II (1995), KTH and Stockholm University, Stockholm 124-131
12. Grønnum, N., 2005. Fonetik og Fonologi, 3. udg., Akademisk Forlag, København.
13. Grønnum, N., 2006. DanPASS - a Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Gangemi, A., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Tapias, D. (Eds.), Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. Lang. Resources and Evaluation, Genova 24-24 May 2006 (CD-ROM).
14. Grønnum N., and Basbøll H. Danish Stød - phonological and cognitive issues. In: Solé Sabater M.-J., Beddor P.S., and Ohala M. (Eds). Experimental Approaches to Phonology (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford 192-206
15. Grønnum N., and Tøndering J. Question intonation in non-scripted Danish dialogues. Proc. XVIth Internat. Cong. Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken August 5-12, 2007 (2007) 1229-1232
16. Helgason, P., 2006. SMTC - a Swedish map task corpus. Working Papers 52. Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature, Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics, 57-60.
17. Henrichsen, P., Juel, 2002. Sidste Års Aviser - Grammatisk opmærkning af et stort dansk aviskorpus. Lambda 27. Institut for Datalingvistik, Handelshøjskolen i København, København.
18. Horiuchi Y., Nakano Y., Koiso H., Ishizaki M., Suzuki H., Okada M., Naka M., Tutiya S., and Ichikawa A. The design and statistical characterization of the Japanese map task dialogue corpus. J. Japanese Soc. Artificial Intelligence 14 (1999) 261-272
19. Jensen, C., Tøndering, J., 2005. Choosing a scale for measuring perceived prominence. In: Trancoso, I. (Ed.) Proc. Interspeech 2005, September 4-8, Lisbon, Portugal, 2385-2388.
20. Kohler K.J. Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica 62 (2005) 88-105
21. Kohler, K.J., 2006. Paradigms in experimental prosodic analysis - from measurement to function. In: Sudhoff, S., Lenertová, D., Meyer, R., Pappert, S., Augurzky, P., Mleinek, I., Richter, N., Schließer, J., (Eds.) Methods in Empirical Prosody Research (= Language, context, and cognition, 3). de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 123-152.
22. Kohler K.J. Beyond laboratory phonology. In: Solé Sabater M.-J., Beddor P.S., and Ohala M. (Eds). Experimental Approaches to Phonology (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford 41-53
23. Paggio, P., 2006. Annotating information structure in a corpus of spoken Danish. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Gangemi, A., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Tapias, D. (Eds.), Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. Lang. Resources and Evaluation, Genova 24-24 May 2006 (CD-ROM).
24. Silverman K., Beckman M., Pitrelli J., Ostendorf M., Wightman C., Price P., Pierrehumbert J., and Hirschberg J. ToBI: a standard for labeling english prosody. Proc. Internat. Conf. Spoken Lang. Process. (1992) 867-870
25. Swerts M. Prosodic features of discourse units (1994), Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
26. Swerts M., and Collier R. On the controlled elicitation of spontaneous speech. Speech Comm. 121 (1992) 463-468
27. Terken J.M.B. The distribution of pitch accents in instructions as a function of discourse structure. Lang. Speech 27 (1984) 269-289
28. Tøndering, J., 2008. Skitser af prosodi i spontant dansk. PhD dissertation, University of Copenhagen.