Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours

Phonetica

Volumn 62, Issue 2-4, 2005, Pages 88-105

  Kohler, Klaus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PHONETICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMANTICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEMANTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 29744461495     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000090091     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ambrazaitis, G.: Between fall and fall-rise. Substance-function relations in German phrase-final intonation contours. Phonetica 62: 196-214 (2005).
2. 0: evidence from German. J. Phonet. 32: 177-197 (2004).
3. Diehl, R.: The role of phonetics within the study of language. Phonetica 48: 320-340 (1991).
4. 0 time shape. Proc. 15th Int. Congr. Phon. Sci. Barcelona 2003, pp. 1217-1220.
5. House, D.: Tonal perception in speech. Trav. Inst. Ling. Lund 24 (1990).
6. Kohler, K. J.: Categorical pitch perception. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Tallinn 1987, vol. 5, pp. 331-333.
7. Kohler, K. J.: Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances of German: phonetics, phonology, semantics. Studies in German intonation. AIPUK 25: 295-368 (1991).
8. Kohler, K. J.: Wieviele späte Gipfel braucht die Modellierung der Prosodie im Deutschen? Methodische and theoretische Reflexionen zur prosodischen Phonologie. ppt-Präsentation (ZIP), Diskussion in der Prosodiegruppe. IPDS Kiel (2004a). URL: http://www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/forschung/lautmuster.en.html
9. Kohler, K. J.: Categorical speech perception revisited. Proc. Conf. From Sound to Sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication. MIT, Cambridge 2004b (also under URL: www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/forschung/lautmuster.en.html).
10. Kohler, K. J.: Paradigms of experimental prosodic analysis: from measurement to function; in Methods in empirical prosody research. Language, context, and cognition (de Gruyter, Berlin 2006).
11. Niebuhr, O.; Kohler, K. J.: Perception and cognitive processing of tonal alignment in German; in Bel, Marlien (eds), Proc. Int. Symp. on Tonal Aspects of Languages, pp. 155-158 (The Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 2004).
12. Ohala, J. J.: Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40: 1-18 (1983).
13. Osgood, C. E.; Suci, G. J.; Tannenbaum, P. H.: The measurement of meaning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1957).
14. Pierrehumbert, J. B.; Steele, S. A.: How many rise-fall-rise contours? Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Phon. Sci., Tallinn 1987, vol. 3, pp. 145-148.
15. Pierrehumbert, J. B.; Steele, S. A.: Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46: 181-196 (1989).
16. Uldall, E.: Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Lang. Speech 3: 223-234 (1960).
17. Uldall, E.: Dimensions of meaning in intonation; in Abercrombie, Fry, MacCarthy, Scott, Trim (eds), In Honour of Daniel Jones, pp. 271-279 (Longmans, London 1964).