DanPASS - A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1578-1583

  Grønnum, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION;

GEOMETRICAL SHAPES; MAP TASK; PART-OF-SPEECH TAGS; PHONETIC TRANSCRIPTIONS; SPONTANEOUS SPEECH CORPUS; VIRTUAL CITIES; WAVE FORMS; ZERO-CROSSINGS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 84860012015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Anderson, A.H., Bader, M., Bard, E.G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H.S. and Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 34, 4, pp. 351-366.
2. Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R. and Yule, G. (1984). Teaching Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Christiansen, T.U. (2005). Byggestene i spontant talt dansk akustisk og perceptuelt. Unpublished project proposal.
4. Grønnum, N. (1985). Intonation and text in Standard Danish, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77, pp. 1205-1216.
5. Grønnum, N. (1986). Sentence intonation in textual context - supplementary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80, pp. 1040-1047.
6. Grønnum, N. (1990). Prosodic parameters in a variety of regional Danish standard languages, with a view towards Swedish and German. Phonetica 47, pp. 182-214.
7. Grønnum, N. (1995). Superposition and subordination in intonation - a nonlinear approach. In K. Elenius and P. Branderud (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm 1995, vol. II. Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University, pp. 124-131.
8. Grønnum, N. (2005). Fonetik og Fonologi, 3. udg., København: Akademisk Forlag.
9. Grønnum, N. and Basbøll, H. (to appear). Danish Stød - Phonological and Cognitive Issues. In P.S. Beddor, M. Ohala, and M.-J. Solé Sabater (eds.) Experimental approaches to Phonology. In honor of John J. Ohala. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Henrichsen, P. Juel (2002). Sidste Års Aviser - Grammatisk opmærkning af et stort dansk aviskorpus. Lambda 27. København: Institut for Datalingvistik, Handelshøjskolen i København.
11. Jensen, C. and Tøndering, J. (2005). Choosing a Scale for Measuring Perceived Prominence. In Isabel Trancoso (Ed.) Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, September 4-8, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 2385-2388.
12. Kohler, K.J. (2005). Timing and Communicative Functions of Pitch Contours. Phonetica 62, pp. 88-105.
13. Kohler, K.J. (2006). Paradigms in Experimental Prosodic Analysis - From Measurement to Function. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertová, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, and J. Schließer (eds.) Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. (= Language, context, and cognition, 3). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
14. Kohler, K.J. (to appear). Beyond Laboratory Phonology. In P.S. Beddor, M. Ohala, and M.-J. Solé Sabater (eds.) Experimental approaches to Phonology. In honor of John J. Ohala. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Silverman K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J. and Hirschberg, J. (1992). ToBI: A standard for Labeling English Prosody. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 867-870.
16. Swerts, M. (1994). Prosodic features of discourse units. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
17. Swerts, M. and Collier, R. (1992). On the controlled elicitation of spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 121, pp. 463-468.
18. Terken, J.M.B. (1984). The distribution of pitch accents in instructions as a function of discourse structure. Language and Speech 27, pp. 269-289.