Telecare research: (Cosmo)politicizing methodology

Alter

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 110-122

  Callén, Blanca ^a   Domènech, Miquel ^a   López, Daniel ^b   Tirado, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cosmopolitics; Methodology; Older people; Participatory Action Research; Telehealthcare

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; ELDERLY CARE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 67349251995     PISSN: 18750672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2009.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersen I.E., and Jaeger B. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy (1999) 331-340
2. Barnett C. Deconstructing radical democracy: Articulation, representation and being-with-others. Political Geography 23 (2004) 503-528
3. Barry A. Making the active scientific citizen. Paper presented at 4S/EASST conference, 'Technoscience, citizenship and culture'. University of Vienna (2000) 28-30
4. Benett P., and Smith S.J. Genetics, insurance and participation: How a citizens' jury reached its verdict. Social Science and Medicine 64 (2007) 2487-2498
5. Bettio F., and Plantenga J. Comparing Care Regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics 10 (2004) 85-113
6. Bond J., and Corner L. Researching dementia: are there unique methodological challenges for health services research?. Ageing and Society 21 (2001) 95-116
7. Callon M. The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science Technology and Society 4 (1999) 81-94
8. Callon, M. (2005). Disabled persons of all countries, unite! In: B. Latour and P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Karlsruhe and Cambridge, MA and London: ZKM and MIT Press, Center for Art and Media, 308-313.
9. Collins H., and Pinch T. The Golem at Large. What You Should Know about Technology (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
10. Davies G. Mapping deliberation: calculation, articulation and intervention in the politics of organ transplantation. Economy and Society 35 (2006) 232-258
11. de Sousa Santos B., Arriscado Nunes J., and Meneses M.P. Opening up the canon of knowledge and recognition of difference. In: de Sousa Santos B. (Ed). Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies (2007), Verso, London
12. Einsiedel E.F., and Eastlick D.L. Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy. Science Communication 21 (2000) 323-343
13. Elam M., and Bertilsson M. Consuming, engaging and confronting science: the emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship. European Journal of Social Theory 6 (2003) 233-251
14. Epstein S. Impure Science. AIDS, Activism, and the politics of knowledege (1996), University of California Press, Berkeley
15. Fals Borda O. Ciencia propia y colonialismo intelectual (1981), Carlos Valencia Editores, Bogotá
16. Finch T., and Mort M. Principles for telemedicine and telecare: the perspectives of a citizen's panel. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11 (2005) 66-68
17. Goebel A. Process, perception and power: notes from Participatory Research in a Zimbabwean Resettlement Area. Development and Change 29 (1998) 277-305
18. Haraway, D. (1995) Ciencia, Cyborg y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra: Universitat de València, Instituto de la Mujer.
19. Hörning G. Citizens' panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment. Science and Public Policy 26 (1999) 351-359
20. Ibáñez, T. (1996). Fluctuaciones conceptuales en torno a la postmodernidad. Caracas, Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Humanidades y Educación. Comisión de Estudios de Postgrados.
21. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41 (2003) 223-244
22. Jiménez, B. (1994) Investigación Acción Participante: una dimensión desconocida. En M. Montero (coord.) Psicología Social Comunitaria. Guadalajara, México: Universidad de Guadalajara, 103-137.
23. Joly P.B., and Marris C. La Participation contre la Mobilisation? Une Analyse comparée du Débat sur les OGM en France et Royaume-Uni. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée 10 (2003) 195-206
24. Kashefi E., and Mort M. Grounded citizens juries: a tool for health activism?. Health Expectations 7 (2004) 290-302
25. Latour B. Pandora's Hope (1999), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
26. Lengwiler M. Participatory approaches in science and technology. Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science. Technology and Human Values 33 (2008) 186-200
27. López D., and Domenech M. Embodying autonomy in a Home Telecare Service. In: Latimer J., and Schillmeier M. (Eds). Un/knowing Bodies (2009), Wiley-Blackwell, London
28. Milligan C., Bingley A., and Gatrell T. Healing and feeling: the place of emotions for older people. In: Davidson J.M., Smith M., and Bondi L. (Eds). Emotional Geographies (2005), Aldershot, Ashgate 49-62
29. Michael M. Technoscience and Everyday Life (2006), Open University Press, Maidenhead
30. Mort M., Finch T., and May C. Making and unmaking telepatients. identity and governance in new health technologies. Science Technology and Human Values 34 (2009) 9-33
31. Mouffe C. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?. Social Research 66 (1999) 745-758
32. Mouffe C. La paradoja democrática (2000), Gedisa, Barcelona
33. Rabeharisoa V., and Callon M. The involvement of patients' associations in research. International Social Science Journal 54 (2002) 57-63
34. Smith G., and Wales C. Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies 48 (2000) 51-65
35. Spink, P. (1999) Psychology and civil society-remembering Gramsci. XXVII Interamerican Congress of Psychology.
36. Stengers I. The invention of modern science (2000), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
37. Stengers I. Sciences et pouvoirs. La démocratie face à la Technoscience (1997), La Découverte, Paris
38. Stengers I. Cosmopolitiques II (1997), La Découverte, Paris
39. Stengers I. The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour B., and Weibel P. (Eds). Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy (2005), MIT, Cambridge 994-1003
40. Webster A. Innovative health technologies and the social: redefining health. Medicine and the Body. Current Sociology 50 (2002) 443-457
41. Villasante T. Aportaciones básicas de la IAP a la epistemología y metodología. Documentación social: Investigación acción participativa 92 (1993) 23-41