Human dimensions of forest disturbance by insects: An international synthesis

Environmental Management

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1174-1186

  Flint, Courtney G ^a   McFarlane, Bonnie ^b   Müller, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bark beetles; Community response; Forest disturbance; Forest management; Human dimensions

Indexed keywords

BARK BEETLES; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; FOREST DISTURBANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HUMAN DIMENSIONS;

MANAGERS; PARKS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

FORESTRY;

BEETLE; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; BEETLE; CANADA; ECOSYSTEM; FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; INSECT; NONHUMAN; SYNECOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; TREES;

COMMUNICATION; ECOLOGY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; INSECTS; NATURAL RESOURCES; RISK MANAGEMENT;

ALASKA; BAVARIA; BAVARIAN FOREST NATIONAL PARK; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; CENTRAL EUROPE; COLORADO; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; KENAI PENINSULA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 67349202002     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9193-4     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. EE Berg JD Henry CL Fastie AD DeVolder SM Matsuoka 2006 Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes Forest Ecology and Management 227 219 232
2. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range (2006) The state of British Columbia's forests 2006. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range. Victoria, BC. Accessed 31 March 2008 http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/sof/
3. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range (2007) Timber supply and the Mountain Pine Beetle Infestation in British Columbia 2007 update. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Victoria, BC. Accessed 5 December 2007. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/mountain-pine-beetle/#whatsnew
4. VH Dale LA Joyce S McNulty RP Neilson MP Ayres MD Flannigan PJ Hanson LC Irland AE Lugo CJ Peterson D Simberloff FJ Swanson BJ Stocks M Wotton 2001 Climate change and forest disturbance BioScience 51 723 734
5. Daniel TC, Orland B, Hetherington J, Paschke JL (1991) Public perception and attitudes regarding spruce bark beetle damage to forest resources on the Chugach National Forest, Alaska. Final Report prepared for US. Forest Service Forest Pest Management, Anchorage, Alaska
6. CR Drever G Peterson C Messier Y Bergeron M Flannigan 2006 Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience? Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 36 2285 2299 (Pubitemid 44945405)
7. TC Earle M Siegrist 2006 Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36 2 383 416
8. Fitchen JM (1990) How do you know what to ask if you haven't listened first? Using anthropological methods to prepare for survey research. The Rural Sociologist. Spring 10(2):15-22
9. CG Flint 2006 Community perspectives on spruce beetle impacts on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Forest Ecology and Management 227 3 207 218
10. CG Flint 2007 Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska Risk Analysis 27 1597 1608 (Pubitemid 350264546)
11. Flint CG (2008) Community perspectives on pine beetle impacts and management in Colorado. Paper presented at the Western forest insect working conference, Boulder, Colorado, April 8, 2008
12. CG Flint R Haynes 2006 Managing forest disturbances and community response: lessons from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Journal of Forestry 104 3 269 275 (Pubitemid 44501293)
13. CG Flint AE Luloff 2005 Natural resource-based communities, risk, and disaster: an intersection of theories Society and Natural Resources 18 5 671 685
14. CG Flint AE Luloff 2007 Community activeness in response to forest disturbance in Alaska Society and Natural Resources. 20 5 431 450 (Pubitemid 46477416)
15. Ganning J, Flint CG (2008) A context-based amenity index for select Colorado communities. Unpublished manuscript available from the authors
16. Gardner RH, Turner MG, O'Neill RG (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York, 404 pp
17. T Greider L Garkovich 1994 Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment Rural Sociology 59 1 1 24 (Pubitemid 24391070)
18. J Hackett 2007 Colorado's mountain pine beetle infestation offers important lessons about managing future forests Colorado Conservator 23 2 8 9
19. Haug M (1993) Entstehungsgeschichte des Nationalparks Bayerischer Wald und Entwicklung seit 1969 [A history of the foundation of Bavarian Forest National Park and its development since 1969]. In: Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten (eds) Eine Landschaft wird Nationalpark [A landscape turns into a national park]. Morsak-Verlag, Grafenau, pp 35-84
20. Heurich M, Reinelt A, Fahse L (2001) Die Buchdruckermassenvermehrung im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald [Mass reproduction of Ips typographus in Bavarian Forest National Park]. In: Nationalparkverwaltung Bayerischer Wald (ed) Waldentwicklung im Bergwald nach Windwurf und Borkenkäferbefall [Development of mountain forests after windthrow and bark beetle infestation]. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Grafenau, pp 9-48
21. Irwin A (2001) Sociology and the environment. Polity Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 224 pp
22. RE Kasperson O Renn P Slovic HS Brown J Emel R Goble JX Kasperson S Ratick 1988 The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework Risk Analysis 8 2 177 187 (Pubitemid 18187435)
23. Kruse J, Pelz R (1991) Developing a public consensus on the management of spruce beetles on the Kenai Peninsula. Institute Soc. Econ. Res., University of Alaska, Anchorage, 36 pp
24. PR Lachapelle SF McCool ME Patterson 2003 Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a "messy" world Society and Natural Resources 16 6 473 490 (Pubitemid 36922691)
25. Luloff AE, Field DR, Krannich RS, Flint C (2007) A matrix approach for understanding humans, fire, and forests. In: Daniels TC, Carroll MS, Mosely C, Raish C (eds) People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, pp 207-215
26. BL McFarlane DO Watson 2008 Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada Risk Analysis 28 203 212
27. BL McFarlane RCG Stumpf-Allen DO Watson 2006 Public perceptions of natural disturbance in Canada's national parks: The case of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) Biological Conservation 130 340 348
28. JJ Molnar J Schelhas C Holeski 2007 Nonindustrial private forest landowners and the southern pine beetle: factors affecting monitoring, preventing, and controlling infestations Journal of Forestry 31 2 93 98 (Pubitemid 46902000)
29. Müller M, Job H (2008) How to manage natural disturbance in protected areas? Visitors' attitudes towards the bark beetle in a German national park. Working Paper
30. Müller M, Mayer M, Job H (2008) Totholz und Borkenkäfer im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald aus touristischer Perspektive [A tourist perspective on dead wood and bark beetles in Bavarian Forest National Park]. In Job H (ed) Die Destination Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald als regionaler Wirtschaftsfaktor [The significance of Bavarian Forest National Park for regional economic development]. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Grafenau, pp 98-114
31. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 544 pp
32. JR Parkins NA MacKendrick 2007 Assessing community vulnerability: a study of the mountain pine beetle outbreak in British Columbia, Canada Global Environmental Change 17 460 471 (Pubitemid 47385196)
33. Parks Canada (2003) What is ecological integrity? http://www.pc.gc.ca/ progs/np-pn/eco-integ/index-e.asp. Accessed 5 December 2007
34. MN Patriquin AM Wellstead WA White 2007 Beetles, trees, and people: regional economic impact sensitivity and policy considerations related to the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, Canada Forest Policy and Economics 9 938 946 (Pubitemid 46654858)
35. STA Pickett ML Cadenasso 1995 Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems Science 269 5222 331 334
36. Rall H (1998) Zur Akzeptanz von Totalreservaten in der Öffentlichkeit: Erfahrungen aus dem Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald [On the public acceptance of total reserves: experiences from Bavarian Forest National Park]. http://www.waldwildnis.de/cd/archiv/rall/h-rall.htm. Accessed 29 December 2007
37. Rentsch G (1988) Die Akzeptanz eines Schutzgebiets untersucht am Beispiel der Einstellung der lokalen Bevölkerung zum Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald [The acceptance of protected areas: the case of residents' attitudes towards Bavarian Forest National Park]. Michael Laßleben, Munich, 87 pp
38. Rogers P (1996) Disturbance ecology and forest management: a review of the literature general technical report. INT-GTR-336. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT
39. Rosenberger RS, Smith EL (1997) Nonmarket economic impacts of forest insect pests: a literature review. General technical report. PSW-GTR-164. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA
40. Ross DW, Daterman GE, Boughton JL, Quigley TM (2001) Forest health restoration in South-Central Alaska: a problem analysis. General technical report. PNW-GTR-523. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, US
41. Stallhofer B (2000) Grenzenloser Böhmerwald? Landschaftsnamen, Regionen und regionale Identitäten [Borderless Bohemian Forest? Place names, regions and regional identities]. Laßleben, Kallmünz, 250 pp
42. Stelzig I (1997) Akzeptanz von Totholz in ausgewählten deutschen Wald-Nationalparken [Acceptance of dead wood in selected German forest national parks]. Department of Biology, Frankfurt University, 112 pp
43. S Stoll-Kleemann 2001 Opposition to the designation of protected areas in Germany Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 109 128 (Pubitemid 32235712)
44. M Suda 2003 Die Zeit heilt alle Wunden: Wie Touristen sich an Totholzflächen gewöhnen [Time heals all wounds: how tourists get accustomed to dead wood] LWF aktuell 40 28 30
45. Suda M (2006) Erholung zwischen toten Bäumen [Recreation among dead trees]. In: Guenther A, Hopfinger H, Kagelmann H-J, Kiefl W (eds) Tourismusforschung in Bayern [Tourism research in Bavaria]. Profil, Munich, pp 252-258
46. Taylor SW, Carroll AL (2004) Disturbance, forest age, and mountain pine beetle outbreak dynamics in BC: a historical perspective. In Shore TL, Brooks JE, Stone JE (eds) Mountain Pine Beetle symposium: challenges and solutions, october 30-31, 2003, Kelowna, BC. Information report BC-X-399. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC, pp 41-51
47. Thomas WI (1928) The child in America: behavior problems and programs. Knopf, New York
48. C Tilly 1973 Do communities act? Sociological Inquiry 43 3-4 209 240
49. M Weiß 1998 Kaputtgeschützt? Zur Kontroverse um die Erweiterung des Nationalparks Bayerischer Wald [Protected to death? The controversy about the enlargement of Bavarian Forest National Park] Geographische Rundschau 50 522 527
50. RA Werner EA Holsten SM Matsuoka RE Burnside 2006 Spruce beetles and forest ecosystems in south-central Alaska: A review of 30 years of research Forest Ecology and Management 227 195 206
51. R Winkler DR Field AE Luloff RS Krannich T Williams 2007 Social landscapes of the Inter-Mountain West: A comparison of "Old West" and "New West" communities Rural Sociology 72 3 478 501 (Pubitemid 47456321)
52. KS Zimmerer 2000 The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 356 369