Community activeness in response to forest disturbance in Alaska

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 431-450

  Flint, Courtney G ^a   Luloff, A E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community activeness; Forest disturbance; Risk perception; Spruce bark beetles; Survey research method

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE ACTION; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

ALASKA; KENAI PENINSULA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

COLEOPTERA; PICEA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 33947581312     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920701211850     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Babbie, E. (1998) The practice of social research, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
2. Beckley, T. M. and Bonnell, B. (2003) Two paths toward sustainable development: Public values in Canada and the United States, pp. 149-167. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
3. Brown, G. (2005) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society Nat. Resources, 18:1, pp. 17-39.
4. Christensen, H. H. and Donoghue, E. M. (2001) A research framework for natural resource-based communities in the Pacific Northwest, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR
5. Clark, R. N., Stankey, G. H., Brown, P. J., Birchfield, J. A., Haynes, R. W. and McCool, S. R. (1999) Ecological stewardship: A common reference for ecosystem management, pp. 297-318. Elsevier Science, Kidlington, UK, Oxford
6. Connelly, N. A., Brown, T. L. and Decker, D. J. (2003) Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society Nat. Resources, 16:6, pp. 541-549.
7. Cutter, S. (2001) The geography of hazard events and losses. Nat. Hazards Observer, 24:1, pp. 3-4.
8. Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, John Wiley and Sons, New York
9. Field, D. R. and Burch Jr, W. R. (1988) Rural sociology and the environment, Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI
10. Fitchen, J. M., Heath, J. S. and Fessenden-Raden, J. (1987) The social and cultural construction of risk, pp. 31-54. Reidel, Boston
11. Flint, C. (2006) Community perspectives on spruce beetle impacts on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula. J. For.t Ecol. Manage., 227:3, pp. 207-218.
12. Flint, C. G. (2004) Community response to forest disturbance on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
13. Flint, C. G. and Haynes, R. (2006) Managing forest disturbances and community responses: Lessons from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. J. For., 104:5, pp. 269-275.
14. Flint, C. G. and Luloff, A. E. (2005) Natural resource-based communities, risk, and disaster: An intersection of theories. Society Nat. Resources, 18:5, pp. 399-412.
15. Giddens, A. (1994) Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, pp. 56-109. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
16. Gray, G. J.,Enzer, M. J. and Kusel, J. (2001) Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management, Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY
17. Haight, R. G., Cleland, D. T., Hammer, R. B.; Radeloff, V. C. and Rupp, T. S. (2004) Assessing fire risk in the wildland-urban interface. J. For., 102:7, pp. 41-48.
18. Hannigan, J. A. (1995) Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective, Routledge, London
19. Haynes, R. W. and Cleaves, D. (1999) Ecological stewardship: A common reference for ecosystem management, pp. 413-429. Elsevier Science, Kiddlington, UK, Oxford
20. Humphrey, C. R. (1990) American rural communities, pp. 34-60. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
21. Irwin, A. (2001) Sociology and the environment, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
22. Isaac, S. and Michael, W. (1997) Handbook in research and evaluation, EdITS, San Diego, CA
23. Kim, J. and Mueller, C. W. (1978) Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
24. Kumagai, Y, Carroll, M. S. and Cohn, P. (2004) Coping with interface wildfire as a human event: Lessons from the disaster/hazards literature. J. For., 102:6, pp. 28-32.
25. Lowenthal, D. (2000) Risk in the modern age: Social theory, science and environmental decision-making, pp. 251-257. St. Martin's Press, New York
26. Luloff, A. E. (1990) American rural communities, pp. 214-227. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
27. Luloff, A. E. (1999) The doing of rural community development research. Rural Society, 9:1, pp. 313-327.
28. Luloff, A. E. and Swanson, L. E. (1995) Investing in people: The human capital needs of rural America, pp. 351-372. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
29. Luloff, A. E. and Wilkinson, K. P. (1979) Participation in the national flood insurance program: A study of community activeness. Rural Sociol., 44:1, pp. 137-152.
30. Marchak, M. P. (1983) Green gold: The forest industry in British Columbia, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada
31. McFarlane, B. and Stedman, R. (2003) Influencing public attitudes toward forest management in Alberta: An example of tours of Sunpine Forest Products mills and woodlands, Canadian Forest Service, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
32. Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T. and McCallum, D. B. (1997) The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Anal., 17:1, pp. 43-54.
33. Reed, P. and Brown, G. (2003) Public land management and quality of life in neighboring communities: The Chugach National Forest planning experience. For. Sci., 49:4, pp. 479-498.
34. Ross, D. W., Daterman, G. E., Boughton, J. L. and Quigley, T. M. (2001) Forest health restoration in south-central Alaska: A problem analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR
35. Savage, I. (1993) Demographic influences on risk perceptions. Risk Anal., 13:4, pp. 413-420.
36. Sorokin, P. A. (1928) Contemporary sociological theories: Through the first quarter of the twentieth century, Harper and Brothers, New York
37. Summers, G. (1986) Rural community development. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 12, pp. 341-371.
38. Thrift, N. (1983) On the determination of social action in space and time. Environ. Plan. D, 1, pp. 23-57.
39. Tilly, C. (1973) Do communities act?. Sociol. Inquiry, 43:3, pp. 209-240.
40. Wilkinson, K. P. (1991) The community in rural America, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
41. Wulfhorst, J. D. and Krannich, R. S. (1999) Effects on collective morale from technological risk. Society Nat.l Resources, 12:1, pp. 1-18.
42. Wynne, B. (1996) Risk, environment, and modernity: Towards a new ecology, pp. 44-83. Sage, London