Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up

Neurosurgical Review

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 335-342

  Sénégas, Jacques ^a   Vital, Jean Marc ^b   Pointillart, Vincent ^b   Mangione, Paolo ^a  

^a Centre Aquitain du Dos   (France)

^b HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

Author keywords

Degenerative disease; Dynamic stabilization; Lumbar spine; Spinous processes; Tension bands

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR INTERSPINOUS DYNAMIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDICLE SCREW; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPINE FUSION; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 67349190534     PISSN: 03445607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-009-0199-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. L Ala-Kokko 2002 Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease Ann Med 34 42 47 (Pubitemid 34454420)
2. DG Borenstein JW O'Mara Jr SD Boden 2001 The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A 1306 1311 (Pubitemid 32852022)
3. P Calmels F Bethoux A Condemine 2005 Low back pain disability assessment tools Ann Readapt Med Phys 48 288 297 (Pubitemid 40826358)
4. T David 2007 Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients Spine 32 661 666 (Pubitemid 46573305)
5. A Elfering N Semmer D Birkhofer 2002 Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals Spine 27 125 134
6. M Etminan FP Girardi SN Khan 2002 Revision strategies for lumbar pseudarthrosis Orthop Clin North Am 33 381 392 (Pubitemid 34701284)
7. G Ghiselli JC Wang NN Bhatia 2004 Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 1497 1503 (Pubitemid 38886539)
8. J Glaser M Stanley H Sayre 2003 A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation Spine 28 1390 1395 (Pubitemid 36808073)
9. T Guehring GW Omlor H Lorenz 2006 Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis Spine 31 1658 1665 (Pubitemid 43999961)
10. P Guigui P Wodecki P Bizot 2000 [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up] Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86 546 557 (Pubitemid 30818739)
11. C Hartigan J Rainville JB Sobel 2000 Long-term exercise adherence after intensive rehabilitation for chronic low back pain Med Sci Sports Exerc 32 551 557 (Pubitemid 30158324)
12. JN Katz SJ Lipson LC Chang 1996 Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 21 92 98 (Pubitemid 26031838)
13. Y Kawaguchi H Ishihara M Kanamori 2007 Adjacent segment disease following expansive lumbar laminoplasty Spine J 7 273 279 (Pubitemid 46667731)
14. SD Keller JE Ware Jr PM Bentler 1998 Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment J Clin Epidemiol 51 1179 1188 (Pubitemid 28527174)
15. P Khoueir KA Kim MY Wang 2007 Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices Neurosurg Focus 22 E3
16. M Kroeber F Unglaub T Guehring 2005 Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model Spine 30 181 187 (Pubitemid 40348206)
17. JP Lemaire H Carrier H Sariali el 2005 Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up J Spinal Disord Tech 18 353 359 (Pubitemid 44378153)
18. A Leplege E Ecosse A Verdier 1998 The French SF-36 health survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation J Clin Epidemiol 51 1013 1023 (Pubitemid 28527157)
19. BI Martin SK Mirza BA Comstock 2007 Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine 32 2119 2126 (Pubitemid 47359619)
20. S Okuda A Miyauchi T Oda 2006 Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients J Neurosurg Spine 4 304 309 (Pubitemid 47325460)
21. F Pellise A Hernandez X Vidal 2007 Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion Spine 32 574 579 (Pubitemid 46398925)
22. A Rohlmann S Neller G Bergmann 2001 Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions Eur Spine J 10 301 308 (Pubitemid 32762774)
23. J Senegas 1991 Surgery of the intervertebral ligaments, alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of degenerative instabilities Acta Orthop Belg 57 Suppl 1 221 226
24. J Senegas 2002 Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 S164 S169
25. J Senegas JM Vital V Pointillart 2007 Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system Eur Spine J 16 1279 1287 (Pubitemid 350109180)
26. Y Shono K Kaneda K Abumi 1998 Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine Spine 23 1550 1558 (Pubitemid 28459959)
27. T Videman MC Battie S Ripatti 2006 Determinants of the progression in lumbar degeneration: a 5-year follow-up study of adult male monozygotic twins Spine 31 671 678
28. Wilke H-J, Drumm J, Haeussler K, et al (2007) Biomechanical comparison of the segmental stability and intradiscal pressure achieved with different interspinous implants. In: 53rd annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Orthopaedic Research Society, San Diego, CA, p 88