What made me want the cheese? A reply to Shaun Gallagher and Dan Hutto

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 549-550

  De Jaegher, Hanne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 67349147904     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.01.002     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. De Jaegher H. Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2009) 535-542
2. De Jaegher H., and Di Paolo E. Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 4 (2007) 485-507
3. Froese T., and Di Paolo E. Stability of coordination requires mutuality of interaction in a model of embodied agents. In: Asada M., Hallam J.C.T., Meyer J.-A., and Tani J. (Eds). From animals to animals 10: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the simulation of adaptive behavior (2008), Springer Verlag, Berlin 52-61
4. Gallagher S. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction?. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 5-7 (2001) 83-108
5. Gallagher S. Deep and dynamic interaction: Response to Hanne De Jaegher. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2009) 547-548
6. Gallagher S. Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations 11 3 (2008) 163-174
7. Hutto D.D. Interacting? Yes. But, of what kind and on what basis. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2009) 543-546
8. Tognoli M., Lagarde J., DeGuzman G.C., and Kelso J.A.S. The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. PNAS 104 19 (2007) 8190-8195