On the effect of downtime costs and budget constraint on preventive and replacement policies

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 144-151

  Pascual, R ^a   Meruane, V ^a   Rey, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Budget constraint; Consequential cost; Decision support systems; Decision making; Downtime cost; Imperfect maintenance; Maintenance policies; Repair rate; Replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BENCHMARKING; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; REPAIR;

BUDGET CONSTRAINT; IMPERFECT MAINTENANCE; MAINTENANCE POLICY; REPAIR RATE; REPLACEMENT;

BUDGET CONTROL;

EID: 67349124535     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vorster, M.C., De la Garza, J.M., Consequential equipment costs associated with lack of availability and downtime. J Constr Eng Manage—ASCE 116:4 (1990), 656–669.
2. Jourden P, Souris JP. Pratique de la Maintenance Industrielle, Paris: Dunod; 1998.
3. Jardine, A.K.S., Zhang, F., Optimal maintenance models with minimal repair, periodic overhaul and complete renewal. IIE Trans 30 (1998), 1109–1119.
4. Scarf, P.A., On the application of mathematical models in maintenance. Eur Oper Res 99 (1997), 493–506.
5. Dekker, R., Scarf, P.A., On the impact of optimisation models in maintenance decision making: the state of the art. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 60 (1998), 111–119.
6. Wang, H., A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res 139 (2002), 469–489.
7. Komonen, K., The structure and effectiveness of industrial maintenance. Acta Polytechn Scand Math Comput Manage Eng Ser, 93, 1998.
8. Komonen, K., A cost model of industrial maintenance for profitability analysis and benchmarking. Int J Prod Econ 79:1 (2002), 15–31.
9. Jardine, A.K.S., Tsang, A., Maintenance, replacement and reliability. 2006, Taylor & Francis, London.
10. Mitchell ZW. A statistical analysis of construction equipment repair costs using field data & the cumulative cost model. PhD thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1998.
11. Roman, P.A., Daneshmend, L., Economies of scale in mining—assessing upper bounds with simulation. Eng Econ 45:4 (2000), 326–338.
12. Quintana, R., Ortiz, J.G., Increasing the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of corrective maintenance using relay-type assignment. J Qual Maint Eng 8:1 (2002), 40–61.
13. Cor H. Using simulation to quantify the impacts of changes in construction work. Master's thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1998.
14. Edwards, D.J., Yisa, S., Modelling the magnitude of plant downtime: a tool for improving plant operations management. Eng Constr Archit Manage, 8(3), 2001.
15. Edwards, D.J., Holt, G.D., Harris, F.C., Predicting downtime costs of tracked hydraulic excavators operating in the UK opencast mining industry. Constr Manage Econ 20 (2002), 581–591.
16. Vorster, M.C., Sears, A.S., Model for retiring, replacing, or reassigning construction equipment. J Constr Eng Manage 113:1 (1987), 125–137.
17. Edwards, D.J., Holt, G.D., Harris, F.C., A model for predicting plant maintenance costs. Constr Manage Econ 18:1 (2000), 65–75.
18. Pathmanathan, V., Construction equipment downtime costs. J Constr Div 106:4 (1980), 604–607.
19. Arditi, D., Kale, S., Tangkar, M., Innovation in construction equipment and its flow into the construction industry. J Constr Eng Manage 123:4 (1997), 371–378.
20. Nepal, M.P., Park, M., Downtime model development for construction equipment management. Eng Const Archit Manage 11:3 (2004), 199–210.
21. Kobbacy, K.A.H., Proudlove, N.C., Harper, M.A., Towards an intelligent maintenance optimization system. J Oper Res Soc 46:7 (1995), 831–853.
22. Kobbacy, K.A.H., Jeon, J., The development of a hybrid intelligent maintenance, optimisation system (HIMOS). J Oper Res Soc 52 (2001), 762–778.
23. Moynihan, G.P., Bowers, J.H., Fonseca, D.J., et al. A knowledge-based approach to maintenance project planning. Expert Syst 19:2 (2002), 88–98.
24. Pham, H., Wang, H., Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94 (1996), 425–438.
25. Calabria, R., Pulcini, G., Inference and test in modeling the failure/repair process of repairable mechanical equipments. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 67 (2000), 41–53.
26. Martorell, S., Sanchez, A., Serradell, V., Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions. Reliab Eng Sys Safety 64 (1999), 19–31.
27. Novak, J.D., Gowin, D.B., Learning how to learn. 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Wildeman, R.E., Dekker, R., Smit, A., A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities. Eur J Oper Res 99:3 (1997), 530–551.
29. Dekker, R., Wildeman, R.E., Schouten, F.A.V.D., A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Math Methods Oper Res 45:3 (1997), 411–435.
30. Pascual, R., Ortega, J.H., Optimal replacement and overhaul decisions with imperfect maintenance and warranty contracts. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 91 (2006), 241–248.
31. Grossmann, I.E., Review of nonlinear mixed-integer and disjunctive programming techniques. Optim Eng 3 (2002), 227–252.
32. Tawarmalani, M., Sahinidis, N.V., Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: a theoretical and computational study. Math Program 99 (2004), 563–591.