Psychological impact of recall in high-risk breast MRI screening

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 365-371

  O'Neill, Suzanne M ^a,b   Rubinstein, Wendy S ^a,b   Sener, Stephen F ^a   Weissman, Scott M ^a,b   Newlin, Anna C ^a,b   West, Daniel K ^a   Ecanow, David B ^a   Rademaker, Alfred W ^a   Edelman, Robert R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Center for Medical Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

BRCA1 genes; BRCA2 genes; Breast neoplasms genetics; Magnetic resonance imaging adverse effects; Psychological stress; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RATING SCALE; RECALL; RISK; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENES, BRCA2; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION;

EID: 67349116832     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0140-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. D Saslow C Boetes W Burke 2007 American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 75 89
2. M Kriege CT Brekelmans C Boetes 2004 Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition N Engl J Med 351 427 437 10.1056/NEJMoa031759
3. CK Kuhl S Schrading CC Leutner 2005 Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 23 8469 8476 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960
4. MO Leach CR Boggis AK Dixon 2005 Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) Lancet 365 1769 1778 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66646-9
5. CD Lehman JD Blume P Weatherall 2005 Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 103 1898 1905 10.1002/cncr.20971
6. E Warner DB Plewes KA Hill 2004 Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination JAMA 292 1317 1325 10.1001/jama.292.11.1317
7. J Brett C Bankhead B Henderson 2005 The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review Psychooncology 14 917 938 10.1002/pon.904
8. Rimer BK, Bluman LG (1997) The psychosocial consequences of mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (22):131-138. Review. 27 refs
9. S Steggles N Lightfoot SM Sellick 1998 Psychological distress associated with organized breast cancer screening Cancer Prev Control 2 213 220
10. JG Elmore CK Wells DH Howard 1997 The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations JAMA 277 49 52 10.1001/jama.277.1.49
11. Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M (1994) Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (16):171-176
12. MD Schwartz KL Taylor KS Willard 2003 Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer J Behav Med 26 105 117 10.1023/A:1023078521319
13. M Horowitz N Wilner W Alvarez 1979 Impact of event scale Psychosom Med 41 209 218
14. EC Sundin MJ Horowitz 2002 Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties Br J Psychiatry 180 205 209 10.1192/bjp.180.3.205
15. B Thewes B Meiser IB Hickie 2001 Psychometric properties of the impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer Psychooncology 10 459 468 10.1002/pon.533
16. W Corneil R Beaton S Murphy 1999 Exposure to traumatic incidents and prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptomatology in urban firefighters in two countries J Occup Health Psychol 4 131 141 10.1037/1076-8998.4.2.131
17. DR Rausch RE Hendrick 2006 How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on your 1.5-T system Radiographics 26 1469 1484 10.1148/rg.265055176
18. L Liberman JH Menell 2002 Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) Radiol Clin North Am 40 409 430 10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00017-3
19. J Brett J Austoker 2001 Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance J Public Health Med 23 292 300 10.1093/pubmed/23.4.292
20. S van Dooren C Seynaeve AJ Rijnsburger 2005 Exploring the course of psychological distress around two successive control visits in women at hereditary risk of breast cancer Eur J Cancer 41 1416 1425 10.1016/j.ejca.2005. 03.020
21. NM Lindberg D Wellisch 2001 Anxiety and compliance among women at high risk for breast cancer Ann Behav Med 23 298 303 10.1207/S15324796ABM2304-9
22. NM Lindberg DK Wellisch 2004 Identification of traumatic stress reactions in women at increased risk for breast cancer Psychosomatics 45 7 16 10.1176/appi.psy.45.1.7
23. SM Miller 1995 Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease Implications for cancer screening and management Cancer 76 167 177
24. FJ Gilbert CM Cordiner IR Affleck 1998 Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer Eur J Cancer 34 2010 2014 10.1016/S0959-8049(98) 00294-9
25. ML Essink-Bot AJ Rijnsburger S van Dooren 2006 Women's acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition Breast 15 673 676 10.1016/j.breast.2006.02.001
26. X Castells E Molins F Macia 2006 Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme J Epidemiol Community Health 60 316 321 10.1136/jech.2005.042119
27. JG Elmore MB Barton VM Moceri 1998 Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations N Engl J Med 338 1089 1096 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601
28. RD Rosenberg BC Yankaskas LA Abraham 2006 Performance benchmarks for screening mammography Radiology 241 55 66 10.1148/radiol.2411051504
29. K Kerlikowske R Smith-Bindman LA Abraham 2005 Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up Radiology 234 684 692 10.1148/radiol.2343031976
30. CK Kuhl RK Schmutzler CC Leutner 2000 Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results Radiology 215 267 279
31. E Warner PA Causer 2005 MRI surveillance for hereditary breast-cancer risk Lancet 365 1747 1749 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66520-8
32. KK Lindfors J O'Connor CR Acredolo 1998 Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 55 58