Interface feature prioritization for web services: Case of online flight reservations

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 862-877

  Seneler, Cagla Ozen ^a   Basoglu, Nuri ^a   Daim, Tugrul ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Portland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive behavior; Conjoint analysis; Customization; Design features; Minimal memory load; User interface characteristics; User preference

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CUSTOMIZATION; DESIGN FEATURES; MINIMAL MEMORY LOAD; USER INTERFACE CHARACTERISTICS; USER PREFERENCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SPEED; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 67349114866     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.028     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 2 (1991) 179-211
2. Alavi M. An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems development. ACM 27 6 (1984) 556-563
3. Baddeley A. Working memory (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
4. Bergman, L., & Lau, T. (2004). Workshop on behavior based user interface customization. In: IUI'04 (pp. 372-373), January 13-16, Madeira, Funchal, Portugal.
5. Boehm B.W., Gray T., and Seewaldt T. Prototyping versus specifying: A multiproject experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10 3 (1984) 290-302
6. Bunt, A., Conati, C., & McGrenere, J. (2004). What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system? In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 117-124), January 13-16, Madeira, Portugal.
7. Butler K.A. Usability engineering turns 10. Interactions 3 1 (1996) 58-75
8. Calisir F., and Calisir F. The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior 20 4 (2004) 505-515
9. Ceaparu I., Lazar J., Besseiere K., Robinson J., and Shneiderman B. Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17 3 (2004) 333-356
10. Chau P.Y.K., and Hu J.H. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management 39 4 (2002) 277-287
11. Chiasson M.W., and Lovato C.Y. Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, ACM 32 3 (2001) 16-35
12. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of a tool measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI '88 (pp. 213-218), May 19-25. New York: ACM/SIGCHI.
13. Dahan E., and Hauser J.R. The virtual customer. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 5 (2001) 332-354
14. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance for empirically testing new end user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Decker R., and Hermelbracht A. Planning and evaluation of new academic library services by means of web-based conjoint analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 6 (2006) 558-572
16. Delone W.H., and McLean E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3 1 (1992) 60-95
17. Eng, K., Lewis, R. L., Tollinger, I., Chu, A., Howe, A., & Vera, A. (2006). Generating automated predictions of behavior strategically adapted to specific performance objectives. In: CHI 2006, Proceedings of automatic generation & usability (pp. 621-630), April 22-27, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
18. Findlater, L., & McGrenere, J. (2004). A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In: Proceedings of CHI'04 (pp. 89-96), April 24-29, Vienna, Austria.
19. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA
20. Gajos, K., & Weld, D. S. (2004). Automatically generating user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 93-100), January 13-16, Madeira, Portugal.
21. Goodhue D.L., and Thompson R.L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19 2 (1995) 213-236
22. Hair J.F., Tatham R.L., Anderson R.E., and Black W. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. (1998), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
23. In: Hart S. (Ed). New product development: A reader (1996), The Dryden Press, London
24. Hall R.R. Prototyping for usability of new technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55 4 (2001) 485-501
25. Hartson H.R. Human-computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. The Journal of Systems and Software 43 2 (1998) 103-118
26. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., and Tam K.Y. Designing product listing pages on e-commerce websites: An examination of presentation mode and information format. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61 4 (2004) 481-503
27. Hui, B., & Craig, B. (2006). Who is asking for help? A Bayesian approach to intelligent assistance. In: Proceedings of IUI'06, January 29-February 1, Sydney, Australia.
28. Jacobs A.M. Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control?. Perception and Psychophysics 39 1 (1986) 47-58
29. Jaspers M.W.M., Steen T., Bos C.V.D., and Geenen M. The think aloud method - a guide to user interface design. Medical Informatics 73 11-12 (2004) 781-795
30. Jenkins S.E., and Cole B.L. The effect of the density of background elements on the conspicuity of objects. Vision Research 22 10 (1982) 1241-1252
31. Kotelly, C., Farhi, P., & Ahnemann, M. D. (2000). Breaking-up is hard to do: Partitioning information (or not) in over-the-phone, speech-recognition interactions. In: CHI 2000 (pp. 169-170), April 1-6, Hague, The Netherlands.
32. Kristofic, A., & Bielikova, M. (2005). Improving adaptation in web-based educational hypermedia by means of knowledge discovery. In: HT'05 (pp. 184-192), September 6-9, Salzburg, Austria.
33. Kumar, M., Gupta, A., & Saha, S. (2006). An approach to adaptive user interfaces using interactive media systems. In: IUI'06 (pp. 312-314), January 29-February 1, Sydney, Australia.
34. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40 3 (2001) 191-204
35. Lightner, N. J. (2001) Strategies for designing usable interfaces for internet applications. In: M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, & R.J. Koubek (Eds.), Usability evaluation and interface design (Vol. I, pp. 1387-1389). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Lightner N.J., and Eastmen C.M. User preference for product information in remote purchase environments. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 3 3 (2002) 174-186
37. Lockhart D., and Knain M. The research report on overview of alternative conjoint approaches. Maritz Marketing Research Inc. 11 1 (1998) 1-6
38. Lucarella D., and Zanzi A. A visual retrieval environment for hypermedia information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14 1 (1996) 3-29
39. Maguire M. Context of use within usability activities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55 4 (2001) 453-483
40. Merrienboer J.V., and Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 17 2 (2005) 147-177
41. Mørch A. Three levels of end-user tailoring: Customization, integration and extension. In: Kyng M., and Mathiassen L. (Eds). Computer and design in context (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA 61-76
42. Mousavi S., Low R., and Sweller J. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology 87 2 (1995) 319-334
43. Mu X., Marchionini G., and Pattee A. The interactive shared educational environment: User interface, system architecture and field study. IEEE 9 3 (2003) 291-300
44. Nielsen, J. (1996). Top ten mistakes in Web design. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, Alertbox for May. Available from www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html.
45. Nielsen, J. (1997). The need for speed. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, Alertbox for March. Available from www.useit.com/alertbox/9703a.html.
46. Nijssen E.J., and Frambach R.T. Market research companies and their use of new product development tools. Journal of Product and Brand Management 7 4 (1998) 305-318
47. Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., & Cohen, J. (2005). Quiet interfaces that help students think. In: UIST'06 (pp. 191-200), October 15-18, Montreux, Switzerland.
48. Ozen, C., & Basoglu, N. (2006). Impact of man-machine interaction factors on enterprise resource planning (ERP) software design. In: Proceedings of Portland international conference for management of engineering and technology '06 (pp. 2335-2341), July 8-13, İstanbul, Turkey.
49. Ozen, C., & Basoglu, N. (2007). Exploring the contribution of technology architecture and design characteristics of information systems (IS) user interface to adoption process. In: Proceedings of Portland international conference for management of engineering and technology '07, August 5-12, Portland, USA.
50. Paas F., Tuovinen J., Tabbers H., and Gerven P.V. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 63-71
51. Paymans, T. F., Linderberg, J., & Neerincx, M. (2004). Usability trade-offs for adaptive user interfaces: Ease of use and learnability. In: IUI'04 (pp. 301-303), January 13-16, Madeira, Funchal, Portugal.
52. Pirolli, P., Card, S. K., & Van Der Wege, M. M. (2001). Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization. In: CHI'01 (pp. 506-513), 31 March-5 April, Washington, USA.
53. Pittermann, J., & Pittermann, A. (2007). A data-oriented approach to integrate emotions in adaptive dialogue management. In: IUI'07 (pp. 270-273), January 28-31, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
54. Ramsay J., Barbesi A., and Preece J. A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web. Interacting with Computers 10 1 (1998) 77-86
55. Rayner K., and Fisher D.L. Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. In: O'Reagan J.K., and Levý-Schoen A. (Eds). Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (1987), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., The Netherlands 293-302
56. Rees J. Transaction security in b2c ecommerce: Perceptions and reality. Usability evaluation and interface design (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ pp. 858-862
57. Rivera, D. (2005). The effect of content customization on learnability and perceived workload. In: CHI 2005 (pp. 1749-1752), April 2-7, Portland, Oregon, USA.
58. Schaik V.P., and Ling J. Using on-line surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites: Psychometric properties and implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 5 (2003) 545-567
59. Sears A., Jacko J.A., and Dubach E.M. International aspects of World Wide Web usability and the role of high-end graphical enhancements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 12 2 (2000) 241-261
60. Selvidge, P. (1999). How long is too long for a website to load? Usability News, 1 (2). Available from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/1s/time_delay.htm.
61. Shavlik, J., Calcari, S., Eliassi-Rad, T., & Solock, J. (1999). An instructable, adaptive interface for discovering and monitoring information on the world-wide web. In: IUI'99 (pp. 157-160), January 5-8, Redondo Beach, CA, USA.
62. Shneiderman B. Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Computing Surveys 16 2 (1984) 65-285
63. Shneiderman B., and Plaisant C. Designing the user interface (2005), Addison Wesley, USA
64. Staggers N. Impact of screen density on clinical nurses' computer task performance and subjective screen satisfaction. International Journal of Man Machine Studies 39 5 (1993) 775-792
65. Stuerzlinger, W., Chapuis, O., Phillips, D., & Roussel N. (2006). User interface façades: Towards fully adaptable user interfaces. In: UIST'06 (pp. 309-313), October, Montreux, Switzerland.
66. Sun H., and Zang P. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Human-Computer Studies 64 2 (2005) 53-78
67. Sutcliffe, A. (1988). Some experiences in integrating specification of human-computer interaction with a structured system development method. In: Proceedings of the fourth conference of the British computer society on people and computers (pp. 145-160), August 5-9, University of Manchester, UK.
68. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12 1 (1988) 257-285
69. Takeuchi, A., & Nagao, K. (1993). Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality. In: INTERCHI'93 (pp. 187-193), April 24-25, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
70. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
71. Trbovich, P. L. (2005). Phonological and visual working memory in processing of route guidance information. In: CHI'05 (pp. 1132-1133), April 2-7, Portland, Oregon, USA.
72. Treisman A. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 2 (1982) 194-214
73. Venkatesh V., and Morris M.G. Why do not men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 24 9 (2000) 115-139
74. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
75. Vlaskamp, B., Hooge, I., & Over, E. (2002). Stimulus density does not affect saccadic search performance. In: The 25th European conference on visual perception, 25-29 August, Glasgow, Scotland.
76. Weld, D. S., Anderson, C., Domingos, P., Etzioni, O., Gajos, K., Lau, T., et al. (2003). Automatically personalizing user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI03) (pp. 159-166), August, Acapulco, Mexico.
77. Xiao, J., Stasko, J., & Catrambone, R. (2007). The role of choice and customization on users' interaction with embodied conversational agents: Effects on perception and performance. In: Proceedings of augmentation, automation & agents '07 (pp. 1293-1302), San Jose, CA, USA.
78. Yoo, J., Gervasio, M., & Langley, P. (2003). An adaptive stock tracker for personalized trading advice. In: IUI'03 (pp. 197-203), January 12-15, Miami, Florida, USA.