A poor correlation exists between oscillometric and radial arterial blood pressure as measured by the Philips MP90 monitor

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 169-174

  Mireles, Samuel A ^a   Jaffe, Richard A ^a   Drover, David R ^a   Brock Utne, John G ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesia monitoring; Blood pressure accuracy; Blood pressure monitoring; Invasive monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT PATIENTS; ANESTHESIA MONITORING; ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRITICAL CARE; DIASTOLIC PRESSURE; GOLD STANDARDS; INVASIVE MONITORING; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEAN PRESSURES; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; MEDICAL CENTER; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PHILIPS; R VALUE; STANDARD DEVIATION; STANFORD UNIVERSITY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANESTHETICS; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; FISHWAYS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; STANDARDS;

MONITORING;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MONITOR; NEUROSURGERY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OSCILLOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; REFERENCE VALUE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 67349105014     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9178-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA standards, guidelines and statements; standards for basic anesthesia monitoring: ASA (2005). http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/sgstoc.htm.
2. Stolt M, Sjönell G, Aström H, Hansson L. Factors affecting the validity of the standard blood pressure cuff. Clin Physiol. 1993;13(6):611-20.
3. Moskowitz DM, Reitz DL. Hemodynamic Monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 1997;15(1):15-36.
4. Green M, Paulus DA, Roan VP, Van der Aa J. Comparison between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure monitoring during cardiac surgery. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1984;1(1):21-6.
5. Gabriel A, Lindblad LE, Angleryd C. Non-invasive vs. invasive beat-to-beat monitoring of blood pressure. Clin Physiol. 1992;12(2):229-35.
6. Rutten AJ, Ilsley AH, Skowronski GA, Runciman WB. A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986;14(1):58-65.
7. Francke A, Wachsmuth H. How accurate is invasive blood pressure determination with fluid-filled pressure line systems? Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2000;25(2):46-54.
8. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard. Manual, electronic or automated sphygmomanometers ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002/A1. 3330 Washington Boulevard, Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22201-4598, USA: AAMI; 2003.
9. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11(Suppl 2):S43-63.
10. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman D, et al. Short report. An outline of the British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11:677-9.
11. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers M. Blood pressure measuring devices: Recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ. 2001;322:531-6.
12. O'Brien E. State of the market for devices for blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6(6):281-6.
13. Chemla D, Teboul JL, Richard C. Noninvasive assessment of arterial pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(3):317-21.
14. Manios E, Vemmos K, Tsivgoulis G, Barlas G, Koroboki E, Spengos K, et al. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12(3):149-56.
15. Amoore JN, Lemesre Y, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, et al. Automatic blood pressure measurement: The oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. J Hypertens. 2008;26(1):35-43.
16. Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, et al. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12(5):297-305.
17. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, Mengden T, Imai Y, Waeber B, Palatini P with the statistical assistance of Atkins N and Gerin W on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. International protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7: 3-17.