Post-quake decision analysis using dynamic programming

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 79-93

  Yeo, Gee Liek ^a   Cornell, C Allin ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftershock; Decision analysis; Dynamic programming; Post quake

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; EARTHQUAKES; LOSSES; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

AFTERSHOCK; DAMAGE PROGRESSIONS; DECISION ANALYSIS; FINANCIAL LOSS; MAINSHOCK; OPTIMAL DECISIONS; POST-QUAKE; PROBABILISTIC FRAMEWORKS; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; TIME-VARYING;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

AFTERSHOCK; DECISION ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 61749087054     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.842     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Building tagging criteria based on Aftershock PSHA. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 3283, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
2. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun C, Luco N, Motahari M. Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. Technical Report 2004/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2004.
3. Luco N, Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
4. Reasenberg P, Jones L. Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science 1989; 243:1173-1175.
5. Reasenberg P, Jones L. Earthquake aftershocks: update. Science 1994; 265:1251-1252.
6. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Technical Report 2005/13, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2005.
7. Yeo GL. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 2005.
8. Paté-Cornell M. Discounting in risk analysis: capital vs human safety. Structural Technology and Risk. University of Waterloo Press: Waterloo, 1984.
9. Bertsekas D. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control: Volume One (2nd edn). Athena Scientific: Nashua, NH, 2000; 464.
10. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun C, Motahari M. Guidelines for seismic assessment of damaged buildings. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
11. Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:291-308.
12. Lee K, Foutch D. Performance evaluation of damaged steel frame buildings subjected to seismic loads. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(4):588-599.