What makes a great lecture? Use of lectures in a hybrid PBL curriculum

Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 109-115

  Azer, Samy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Great lecture; PBL; Student learning

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL THINKING; CURRICULUM; ERROR; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTIVATION; PLANNING; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; SKILL; TEACHING; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 67249126277     PISSN: 1607551X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70049-X     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:173-180 (Pubitemid 46390174)
2. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The physiological basis of problem-based learning: a review of evidence. Acad Med 1992;67:557-565
3. David D. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behaviour or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-874 (Pubitemid 29408939)
4. Binstadt ES, Walls RM, White BA, et al. A comprehensive medical simulation education curriculum for emergency medical residents. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:495-504, 504.e1-11 (Pubitemid 46420722)
5. Costa ML, vanRensburg L, Rushton N. Does teaching style matter? A randomized trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ 2007;41:214-217 (Pubitemid 46213702)
6. Hansen WF, Ferguson KJ, Sipe CS, et al. Attitudes of faculty and students toward case-based learning in the third-year obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:644-647 (Pubitemid 40215009)
7. Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM. Didactic lecture versus instructional standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship. Am J Surg 2005;189:243-248 (Pubitemid 40255122)
8. Mavis B, Doig K. The value of non-cognitive factors in predicting students' first-year academic probation. Acad Med 1998;73:201-203 (Pubitemid 28134016)
9. Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM. Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized perspective cross-over study. Am J Surg 2006;191:262-267 (Pubitemid 43151278)
10. Nayak SB. The broken lecture: an innovative method of teaching. Adv Physiol Educ 2006;30:48. (Pubitemid 43244414)
11. Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Edited by JD Fife. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1991.
12. Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Fam Med 2005;37:12-14 (Pubitemid 40094084)
13. Charlton BG. Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning. Med Hypotheses 2006;67:1261-1265 (Pubitemid 44442669)
14. Brieger GH. Getting into medical school in the good old days: good for whom? The first Nicholas E. Davies Memorial Lecture. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1138-1143
15. Meyers C. Teaching Students to Think Critically. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc, 1986.
16. Paul R, Elder L. Critical thinking: teaching students how to study and learn (part I). J Dev Educ 2002;26:36-42. (Pubitemid 36092762)
17. th edition. Lexington: DC Health and Company, 1994.
18. Lang JM. Perfecting your vocal technique. Chron High Educ 2007;35:C2-3.
19. Gülpinar MA, Yěgen BC. Interactive lecturing for meaningful learning in large groups. Med Teach 2007;27:590-594
20. Schell K. Promoting student questioning. Nurse Educ 1998;23:8-12.
21. Blackbourn JM, Payne JS, Hamson N. When the student is the customer. Record Educ Leadersh 1997;17:37-39
22. Dahlgren LO, Eriksson BE, Gyllenhammar H, et al. To be and to have a critical friend in medical teaching. Med Educ 2006;40:72-78