Auditory mismatch negativity for speech sound contrasts is modulated by language context

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1081-1084

  Lipski, Silvia C ^a,b   Mathiak, Klaus ^c,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Magnetoencephalography; Mismatch negativity; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; LANGUAGE; METHODOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PHONETICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67249110366     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283056378     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Best CT. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Strange W, editor. Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in crosslanguage research. Baltimore, MD: York Press; 1995:171-206.
2. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118:2544-2590.
3. Alho K. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hear 1995; 16:38-50.
4. Joanisse MF, Robertson EK, Newman RL. Mismatch negativity reflects sensory and phonetic speech processing. Neuroreport 2007; 18:901-905.
5. Näätänen R, Lehtokoski A, Lennes M, Cheour M, Huotilainen M, Iivonen A, et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 1997; 385:432-434.
6. Kirmse U, Ylinen S, Tervaniemi M, Vainio M, Schröger E, Jacobsen T. Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. J Psychophysiol 2008; 67:131-143.
7. Kaan E, Wayland R, Bao M, Barkley CM. Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: an event-related potential study. Brain Res 2007; 1148:113-122.
8. Zhang Y, Kuhl PK, Imada T, Kotani M, Tohkura Y Effects of language experience: neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. Neuroimage 2005; 26:703-720.
9. Lipski SC, Mathiak K. A magnetoencephalographic study on auditory processing of native and non-native fricative contrasts in Polish and German listeners. Neurosci Lett 2007; 415:90-95.
10. Bitz U, Gust K, Spitzer M, Kiefer M. Phonological deficit in school children is reflected in the Mismatch Negativity. Neuroreport 2007; 18:911-915.
11. Lepistö T, Kajander M, Vanhala R, Alku P, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R, Kujala T. The perception of invariant speech features in children with autism. Biol Psychol 2008; 77:25-31.
12. Sussman E, Winkler I. Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system. Cogn Brain Res 2001; 12:431-439.
13. Mitterer H, Blomert L. Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: evidence for early compensation. Percept Psychophys 2003; 65:956-969.
14. Lisker L. Hearing the Polish sibilants /s, Š, S/: phonetic and auditory judgements. In: Grønnum N, Rischel J, editors. To honour Eli Fischer-Jørgensen. Copenhagen: CA Reitzel; 2001:226-237.
15. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9:102-107.
16. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaugham HG Jr. Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport 1998; 9:4167-4170.
17. Mathiak K, Hertrich I, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H. Functional cerebral asymmetries of pitch processing during dichotic stimulus application: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40:585-593.
18. Efron E, Tibshirani EJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. New York, London: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
19. Zatorre RJ, Gandour JT. Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363:1087-1104.
20. Näätänen R, Sams M, Järvilehto T, Soininen K. Probability of deviant stimulus and event-related brain potentials. In: Sinz R, Rosenzweig MR, editors. Psychophysiology 1980. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1983:397-405.
21. Grimm S, Schröger E. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the mismatch negativity (MMN) system. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25:241-249.