Sound level-dependent growth of N1m amplitude with low and high-frequency tones

NeuroReport

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 548-552

  Soeta, Yoshiharu ^a   Nakagawa, Seiji ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked fields; Frequency; Level; Loudness; Magnetoencephalography; N1m

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN; HEARING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SOUND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67049167415     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832a6f15     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Zyost WA. Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.
2. Fletcher H, Munson WA. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J Acoust Soc Am 1933; 5:82-108.
3. Robinson DW, Dadson MA. A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones. Br J Appl Phys 1956; 7:166-181.
4. Takeshima H, Suzuki Y, Fujii H, Kumagai M, Ashihara K, Fujimori T, Sone T. Equal-loudness contours measured by the randomized maximum likelihood sequential procedure. Acustica-acta acustica 2001; 87:389-399.
5. Davis H, Bowers C, Hirsh SK. Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the AER at different stimulus frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 43:431-438.
6. Antonoro F, Skinner PH, Jones JJ. Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the AER at different stimulus frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1969; 46:1433-1436.
7. Knight RT, Hillyard SA, Woods DL, Neville HJ. The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditory evoked potential in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50:112-124.
8. Knight RT, Scabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth C. The effects of lesions of superior temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe on temporal and vertex components of the human AEP. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988;70:499-509.
9. Lütkenhöner B, Olaf Steinsträter O. High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 1998; 3:191-213.
10. Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Seither-Preisler A, Lammertmann C, Lütkenhöner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13:765-772.
11. Seither-Preisler A, Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Seither A, Lutkenhoner B. Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19:3073-3080.
12. Ross B, Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C, Hoke M. Frequency specific threshold determination with the CERAgram method: basic principle and retrospective evaluation of data. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4:12-27.
13. Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24:375-425.
14. Thronton AR, Mendel MI, Anderson CV. Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on middle latency components of the averaged auditory electroencephalographic response. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20:81-94.
15. Relkin EM, Doucet JR. Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101:2735-2740.
16. Moore BCJ. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. New York: Academic Press; 2003.
17. Palmer AR, Russell IJ. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear Res 1986;24:1-15.
18. Phillips DP, Semple MN, Calford MB, Kitzes LM. Level-dependent representation of stimulus frequency in cat primary auditory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1994; 102:210-226.
19. Hart HC, Hall DA, Palmer AR. The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl's gyrus is different for low- and high- frequency tones. Hear Res 2003; 179:104-112.
20. Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KA, Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31:87-97.
21. Lütkenhöner B, Klein JS. Auditory evoked field at threshold. Hear Res 2007;228:188-200.
22. Klug A, Khan A, Burger RM, Bauer EE, Hurley LM, Yang L, et al. Latency as a function of intensity in auditory neurons: influences of central processing. Hear Res 2000; 148:107-123.