Improving the development of e-business systems by introducing process-based software product lines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4034 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 348-361

  Bayer, Joachim ^a   Kose, Mathias ^b   Ocampo, Alexis ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b Ehotel AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

E-BUSINESS; E-BUSINESS APPLICATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES; WORKFLOWS;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 33746265803     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11767718_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. M. Antkiewicz, K. Czarnecki.: FeaturePlugin: feature modeling plug-in for Eclipse, Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange, p.67-72, October 24-24, 2004.
2. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, T. Widen, and J. -M. DeBaud. PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'99), May 1999.
3. J. Bayer, W. Buhl, C. Giese, T. Lehner, A. Ocampo, F. Puhlmann, E. Richter, A. Schnieders, J. Weiland, M. Weske. Process Family Engineering: Modeling variant-rich processes. PESOA-Report No. 18/2005, Juni 2003.
4. G. J. Chastek (ed). Software Product Lines. Proceedings of the Second International Software Product Lines Conference (SPLC2), San Diego, California, USA, August 2002.
5. Business Process Management Initiative (DPMI): Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Version 1.0, www.bpmi.org, Mal 2004.
6. P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines. Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
7. P. Donohoe (ed.).Software Product Lines - Experience and Research Directions. Proceedings of the First International Software Product Lines Conference (SPLC1), Denver, Colorado, USA, August 2000.
8. C. Giene, H. Overdick, W. Buhl. Realisierungsstrategien für Prozessfamillen: Werkzeuge für Modellierung und Generierung. PESOA-Report No. 15/2003, Process Family Engineering in Service-Oriented Applications, Juni 2005.
9. D. Hollingsworth. The Workflow Reference Model. Technical report, Workflow Management Coalition, Hampshire, 1995.
10. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. A. Hess, W. E. Novak, A. S. Peterson; "Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study". Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, 1990.
11. D. Muthig: A Light-weight Approach Facilitating an Evolutionary Transition Towards Software Product Lines. Stuttgart Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2002 (PhD Theses in Experimental Software Engineering Vol. 11). Kaiserslautern, Univ., Diss., 2002.
12. R. Nord (ed.). Software Product Lines. Proceedings of the Third International Conference (SPLC 2004), Boston, MA, USA, August - September, 2004.
13. A. Ocampo, F. Bella, J. Munch. Software process commonality analysis. Software Process: Improvement and Practice. Vol. 10(3), pp. 273-285, 2005.
14. D. Plötner, M. Kose, T. Hering, A. Werner. Prozesse im E-Business am Beispiel ausgewählter Geschäftsprozesse des Partners ehotel AG. PESOA-Report No. 20/2005, Juni 2005.
15. F. Puhlmann, A. Schnieders.: Process Family Engineering: Variability Mechanisms, Technical Report PESOA-Report No. TR 17/2005, Process Family Engineering in Service-Oriented Applications, Jun. 2005.
16. G. van de Putte, T. Benedett, D. Gagic, P. Gersak, K. Krutzler, M. Perry. Intra-Enterprise Business Process Management. IBM Corporation. IBM International Technical Support Organization. IBM Reedbook. October 2001.