Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: Comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1720-1725

  Bluvol, Nathan ^a,b   Kornecki, Anat ^c   Shaikh, Allison ^c   Fernandez, David Del Rey ^a   Taves, Donald H ^c   Fenster, Aaron ^a,b,c  

^a ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biopsy time; Breast biopsy; Image guidance; Needle motion; Ultrasound biopsy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BREAST BIOPSY; CHICKEN; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; ANIMAL; BREAST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; CHICKENS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 67049146292     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1434     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kossoff MB. Ultrasound of the breast. World J Surg 2000; 24:143-157 (Pubitemid 30053704)
2. Kwong A, Hancock SL, Bloom JR, et al. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. Breast J 2008; 14:39-48
3. Halac M, Yilmaz MH, Sonmezoglu K, et al. Female breast surface radiation exposure during FDG PET/CT examinations. Nucl Med Commun 2007; 28:924-928 (Pubitemid 350306785)
4. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology 2008; 246:434-443
5. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis: fourth edition-summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:614-622
6. Bolívar AV, Alonso-Bartolomé P, García EO, Ayensa FG. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analy- sis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 2005; 46:690-695
7. Prasad SN, Houserkova D. A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2007; 151:315-322
8. Matalon TAS, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174:43-47 (Pubitemid 20017081)
9. Han D, Lan Seo Y, Soon Choi C, et al. A steerable guiding device: the new method in ultrasound guidance. Invest Radiol 2002; 37:626-631 (Pubitemid 35231697)
10. Paltieli Y, Degani S, Zrayek A, et al. A new device for free-hand, obstetric ultrasound-guided procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:269-273 (Pubitemid 34304574)
11. Paladini G, Sauer F, inventors. Optical needle guide for ultrasound guided needle biopsy. US patent 6,702,749. May 9, 2004
12. Bluvol N, Shaikh A, Kornecki A, Fernandez DDR, Downey D, Fenster A. A needle guidance system for biopsy and therapy using two-dimensional ultrasound. Med Phys 2008; 35:617-628 (Pubitemid 351190881)
13. Smith WL, Surry KJ, Kumar A, McCurdy L, Downey DB, Fenster A. Comparison of core needle breast biopsy techniques: freehand versus three-dimensional US guidance. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:541-550 (Pubitemid 34437604)
14. Harvey JA, Moran RE, Hamer MM, DeAngelis GA, Omary RA. Evaluation of a turkey-breast phantom for teaching freehand, US-guided core needle breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:565-569 (Pubitemid 127470976)
15. Hassard MK, McCurdy LI, Williams JCA, Downey DB. Training module to teach ultrasound- guided breast biopsy skills to residents improves accuracy. Can Assoc Radiol J 2003; 54: 155-159 (Pubitemid 37033663)
16. Surry KJM, Austin HJB, Fenster A, Peters T. Poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel phantoms for use in ultrasound and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49:5529-5546
17. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL; ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 2006; 239:693-702 (Pubitemid 43830604)
18. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 2001; 16:101-117 (Pubitemid 33636344)
19. Phal PM, Brooks DM, Wolfe R. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom. AJR 2005; 184:1652-1656 (Pubitemid 43821853)
20. Mainiero MB, Gareen IF, Bird CE, Smith W, Cobb C, Schepps B. Preferential use of sonographically guided biopsy to minimize patient discomfort and procedure time in a percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy program. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:1221-1226 (Pubitemid 35257571)