Positive illusions about a partner's physical attractiveness and relationship quality

Personal Relationships

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 263-283

  Barelds, Dick P H ^a,b   Dijkstra, Pieternel ^b  

^a Department of Psychology ^*  (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67049145392     PISSN: 13504126     EISSN: 14756811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01222.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621 1630.
2. Alicke, M. D., Smith, R. H., & Klotz, M. L. (1986). Judgments of physical attractiveness: The role of faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 381 389.
3. Arrindell, W. A., Boelens, W., & Lambert, H. (1983). On the psychometric properties of the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ): Evaluation of self-ratings in distressed and "normal" volunteer couples based on the Dutch version. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 293 306.
4. Arrindell, W. A., & Schaap, C. (1985). The Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ): An extension of its construct validity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 295 299. (Pubitemid 16255921)
5. Barelds, D. P. H. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19, 501 518. (Pubitemid 41596155)
6. Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2006). Partner personality in distressed relationships. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 392 396. (Pubitemid 46062134)
7. Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Relationship onset and personality similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 479 496.
8. Barelds, D. P. H., Luteijn, F., & Arrindell, W. A. (2003). Nederlandse Relatievragenlijst (NRV): Handleiding [Dutch Relationship Questionnaire (DRQ): Manual]. Amsterdam : Harcourt.
9. Barelds-Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Positive illusions about one's partner's physical attractiveness. Body Image, 5, 99 108.
10. Bray, G. A. (1998). Contemporary diagnosis and management of obesity. Newton, PA : Handbooks in Health Care.
11. Brown, J. D. (1985). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353 376.
12. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1 49.
13. Buss, D., Larsen, R., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251 255.
14. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York : Basic Books.
15. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fletchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271 278. (Pubitemid 36820380)
16. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D. T., & Warntjes, A. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241 250. (Pubitemid 33626500)
17. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327 342. (Pubitemid 36820384)
18. Central Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) 2007). Zelfgerapporteerde medische consumptie, gezondheid en leefstijl [self reported medical consumption, health and lifestyle]. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://statline.cbs.nl/ StatWeb.
19. Corneille, O., Monin, B., & Pleyers, G. (2005). Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive face. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 431 437. (Pubitemid 40717254)
20. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1158 1166.
21. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285 290.
22. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but... : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109 128.
23. Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245 264.
24. Englis, B. G., Solomon, M. R., & Ashmore, R. D. (1994). Beauty before the eyes of the beholders: The cultural encoding of beauty types in magazine advertising and music television. Journal of Advertising, 23, 49 64.
25. Fallon, A. E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102 105. (Pubitemid 16147367)
26. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romanticattraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981 993.
27. Franzoi, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1986). The Body Esteem Scale: A convergent and discriminant validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 24 31.
28. Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A. (1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 173 178. (Pubitemid 14118492)
29. Gil-Burmann, C., Peláez, F., & Sánchez, S. (2002). Mate choice differences according to sex and age: An analysis of personal advertisements in Spanish newspapers. Human Nature, 13, 493 508. (Pubitemid 36195387)
30. Green, S. K., Buchanan, D. R., & Heuer, S. K. (1984). Winners, losers, and choosers: A field investigation of dating initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 502 511.
31. Hageman, P., Lange, A., van Dyck, R., Hoogduin, K., & Meijer, A. M. (1990). Het voorspellend vermogen van de Interactionele Probleem Oplossings Vragenlijst; een onderzoek bij agorafobici, dwangneurotici, ouders van astmapatiënten en drugsverslaafden [The prognostic abilities of the Interactional Problem Solving Inventory: A study of agoraphobics, obsessive-compulsives, and parents of asthma patients and drug addicts]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 45, 335 344.
32. Haven, S., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, Netherlands.
33. Hume, D. K., & Montgomery, R. (2001). Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of "quality"' in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 93 112. (Pubitemid 33619687)
34. Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Sullivan, K. T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the association between attributions and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413 424.
35. Kashy, D. A., Campbell, L., & Harris, D. W. (2006). Advances in data analytic approachesfor relationships research: The broad utility of hierarchical linear modelling. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 73 89). New York : Cambridge University Press.
36. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451 477). Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press.
37. Kenny, D. A. (2004). Dyadic analysis. Retrieved February 22, 2007, from http://davidakenny.net/dyad.htm.
38. Kenrick, D. T., Gutierres, S. E., & Goldberg, L. L. (1989). Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 159 167.
39. Kiers, H. A. L., & Groenen, P. (1996). A monotonically convergent algorithm for orthogonal congruence rotation. Psychometrika, 61, 375 389. (Pubitemid 126350215)
40. Knee, C. R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N. A., Neighbors, C., & Patrick, H. (2001). Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 808 819.
41. Lange, A. (1983). De Interactionele Probleem Oplossings Vragenlijst [The Interactional Problem Solving Inventory]. Deventer, Netherlands : Van Loghum Slaterus.
42. Lewandowski, G., Aron, A., & Gee, J. (2007). Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite-sex physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships, 14, 571 585.
43. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224 253.
44. McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2004). Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: Should couples expect the best or brace for the worst? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729 743. (Pubitemid 38628815)
45. McNulty, J. K., Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 135 143.
46. McNulty, J. K., O'Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: "Don't sweat the small stuff".... But it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631 646.
47. Miller, P. J. E., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2003). Trait expressiveness and marital satisfaction: The role of idealization processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 978 995. (Pubitemid 37469557)
48. Miller, P. J. E., Niehuis, S., & Huston, T. L. (2006). Positive illusions in marital relationships: A 13-year longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1579 1594. (Pubitemid 44808053)
49. Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035 1048. (Pubitemid 38023934)
50. Murray, S. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23 34.
51. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586 604.
52. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J., & Dolderman, D. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends' perspectives to married partners' views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 600 620.
53. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155 1180. (Pubitemid 126422704)
54. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79 98.
55. Sangrador, J. L., & Yela, C. (2000). "What is beautiful is loved": Physical attractiveness in love relationships in a representative sample. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 207 218.
56. Swami, V., Antonakopoulos, N., Tovée, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2006). A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles, 54, 201 211. (Pubitemid 44127159)
57. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2008). Is love really so blind? The Psychologist, 21, 108 111.
58. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Georgiades, C., & Pang, L. (2007). Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness. Body Image, 4, 97 101.
59. Swami, V., Neto, F., Tovée, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2007). Preferences for female body weight and shape in three European countries. European Psychologist, 12, 220 228.
60. Swami, V., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., Voracek, M., & Furnham, A. (2009). Evaluating the physical attractiveness of oneself and one's romantic partner: Individual and relationship correlates of the love-is-blind bias. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 35 43.
61. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 383 393. (Pubitemid 43024714)
62. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2006). The influence of body mass index on the physical attractiveness preferences of feminist and nonfeminist heterosexual women and lesbians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 252 257. (Pubitemid 44181373)
63. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193 210.
64. Teuscher, U., & Teuscher, C. (2007). Reconsidering the double standard of aging: Effects of gender and sexual orientation on facial attractiveness ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 631 639. (Pubitemid 44914537)
65. Yela, C., & Sangrador, J. L. (2001). Perception of physical attractiveness throughout loving relationships. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 57 75.
66. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224 228.