Negotiating and teaching workplace drug testing: A labor perspective

Labor Studies Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 67-86

  Oleson, Clara ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67049134881     PISSN: 0160449X     EISSN: 15389758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0160449X0402800404     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. American Association of Medical Review Officers (AAMRO). 2002. Medical review officer handbook. 8 th ed. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
2. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 1999. Drug testing: A bad investment. Washington, D. C
3. Axel, Helen. 1990. Corporate experiences with drug testing programs. Washington, D. C. : The Conference Board, Inc
4. Bennett N., T. C. Blum, and P. M. Roman. 1994. Employee attitudes toward drug testing: Effects of individual characteristics and employment setting. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Joumal 7: 117-128
5. Caplan Yale H., and Bruce A. Goldberger. 2001. Alternative specimens for workplace drug testing. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 25, no. 5: 396-399
6. Casserly, Theresa K. 1997. Evidentiary and constitutional implications of employee drug testing through hair analysis. Cleveland State Law Review 45: 469
7. Cavanaugh, J. Michael, and Parsed Pushkala. 1994. Drug testing as symbolic managerial action: In response to: A case against workplace drug testing. Organization Science 5, no. 2: 267-271
8. Cook, J. D., Y. H. Caplan, C. P. LoDico, and D. M. Bush. 2000. The characterization of human urine for specimen validity determination in workplace drug testing: A review. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 24, no. 7: 579-588
9. Crow, Stephen M., and Sandra J. Hartman. 1992. Drugs in the workplace: Overstating the problems and the cures. The Journal of drug Issues 22, no. 4: 923-937
10. Department of Health and Human Services, SAMHSA. 2001. Proposed specimen validity rules. Federal Register 66, no. 43876 (21 August)
11. Draper, Elaine. 1998. Drug testing in the workplace: The allure of management technologies. International Journal of sociology and Social Policy 18, no. 5 / 6: 62
12. Drug Testing Advisory Board. 2002. Minutes open session (13 March): http://workplace.samhsa.gov/ResourceCenter/Dt/Dtab/Transcript031302.htm
13. Elkouri, Frank, and Edna Asper Elkouri. 1993. Resolving drug issues. Washington, D. C. : Bureau of National Affairs
14. Feldacker, Bruce. 2000. Labor guide to labor law. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
15. Fendrich, Michael, and Julia Yun Soo Kim. 2002. The experience and acceptability of drug testing: Poll trends. Journal of Drug Issues 32, no. 1 (winter): 81-97
16. Feinauer, Dale M. 1990. The relationship between workplace accident rates and drug and alcohol abuse: The unproven hypothesis. Labor Studies Journal 15, no. 3 (winter): 3-15
17. French, M. T., M. C. Roebuck, and P. K. Alexandre. 2001. Illicit drug use, employment, and labor force participation. Southern Economic Journal 68, no. 2: 349-368
18. Gerber, J. K., and G. S. Yacoubian. 2001. Evaluation of drug testing in the workplace: Study of the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemen T - ASCE 127: 443-444
19. Gilliom, John. 1994. Surveillance, privacy, and the law: Employee drug testing and the politics of social control. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press
20. Gips, Michael A. 2001. Drug test cheating down? Security Management 45, no. 11. See http://www.securitymanagement.com/library/001136.html
21. Hartwell, T. D., P. D. Steele, and N. F. Rodman. 1998. Workplace alcohol-testing programs: Prevalence and trends. Monthly Labor Review 121, no. 6: 27-34
22. Hersch, Rebekah K., Royer F. Cook, Diane K. Deitz, and James V. Trudeau. 2000. Methodological issues in workplace substance abuse prevention research. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 27, no. 2: 144-151
23. Hoffman, J. P., and C. L. Larison. 1999. Worker drug use and workplace drug-testing programs: Results from the 1994 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Contemporary Drug Problems 26, no. 2: 331-354
24. Institute of Management & Administration. 2000. What does substance abuse cost? Managing Benefits Plans 5: 8
25. Kraus, J. F. 2001. The effects of certain drug-testing programs on injury reduction in the workplace: An evidence-based review. International Journal Occupational and Environmental Health 7: 103-108
26. Loomis, Lloyd. 1990. Drug testing: A workplace guide to designing practical policies and winning arbitrations. Washington, D. C. : Bureau of National Affairs, Inc
27. MacDonald, S. 1997. Work-place alcohol and other drug testing: A review of the scientific evidence. Drug and Alcohol Review 16, no. 3: 251-259
28. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). 1987. Guideline memorandum from the Office of the General Counsel of the NLRB on drug and alcohol testing of employees (8 September)
29. Normand, Jacques, Richard O Lempert, and Charles P. O'Brien, eds. 1994. Under the influence?Drugs and the American workforce. Committee on Drug Use in the Workplace, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council/Institute of Medicine
30. Office of Management and Budget. 1989. Questions and answers on Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. Federal Register 54, no. 4947 (31 January)
31. Rothstein, Mark A. 1991. Workplace drug testing: A case study in the misapplication of technology. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 5, no. 1: 66-93
32. ----. 1999. Analytic series: A-10, Substance use and mental health characteristics by employment status
33. Shepard, Edward, and Thomas Clifton. 1998. Drug testing and labor productivity estimates: Applying a production function model. Research paper 18, Le Moyne College Institute of Industrial Relations, Syracuse, N. Y
34. Thompson, Robert. 1990. Substance abuse and employee rehabilitation. Washington, D. C. : Bureau of National Affairs
35. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1990. Alcohol and drugabuse provisions in major collective bargainingagreements in selected industries. Bulletin 2369
36. ----. 1989. Survey of employer anti-drug programs. Report 760
37. Walsh, L Elinson, and L. Gostin. 1992. Worksite drug testing. Annual Rev. Public Health 13: 197-221
38. Wefing, John B. 2000. Employer drug testing: Disparate judicial and legislative responses. Albany Law Review 63: 799
39. Webster, Barbara, and Jerrold G. Brown. 1989. Mandatory and random drug testing in the Honolulu police department. National Institute of Justice: Research in Action (October): 1-8
40. Zwerling, Craig. 1994. Drug testing. Journal ofthe American Medical Association 272, no. 18: 1467-1468
41. Zwerling, Craig, James Ryan, and John Endel. 1990. The efficacy of preemployment drug screening for marijuana and cocaine in predicting employment outcome. Journal of the American Medical Association 264, no. 20: 2639-2643