Methodological issues in workplace substance abuse prevention research

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 144-151

  Hersch, Rebekah K ^a   Cook, Royer F ^b   Deitz, Diane K ^b   Trudeau, James V ^b  

^a The ISA Group   (United States)

^b ISA Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

EID: 0034062451     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02287309     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Preliminary Estimates from the 1995 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, 1996.
2. Horgan C: Costs of untreated substance abuse to society. TIE Communique 1995; Spring/Special Issue:4-7.
3. Hoffman JP, Larison C, Sanderson A: An Analysis of Worker Drug Use and Workplace Policies and Programs. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA)97-3142. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, 1997.
4. Alleyne BC, Stuart P, Copes R: Alcohol and other drug use in occupational facilities. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1991;3:496-500.
5. Lehman W, Simpson D: Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 1992; 77:309-321.
6. Moody DE, Crouch DJ, Andrenyak DM, et al.: Mandatory post-accident drug and alcohol testing for the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). In: Gust SW, Walsh JM (Eds.): Drugs in the Workplace: Research and Evaluation. NIDA Research Monograph No. 100. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1990, pp. 79-96.
7. Normand J, Salyards S, Mahoney JJ: An evaluation of pre-employment drug testing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990; 75:629-639.
8. Winkler H, Sheridan J: An Examination of Behavior Related to Drug Use at Georgia Power Company. Paper presented at the National Institute on Drug Abuse Conference on Drugs in the Workplace: Research and Evaluation Data, Bethesda, MD, 1989.
9. Cook RF: Drug abuse prevention in the workplace. In: Bukoski W, SlobodaZ (Eds.): Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention Theory, Science and Practice. New York: Plenum, in press.
10. Cook RF, Back A: Say Yes! Healthy Choices for Feeling Good. Alexandria, VA: ISA Associates, 1990.
11. Cook RF, Back A: Working People: Decisions about Drinking. Alexandria, VA: ISA Associates, 1993.
12. Cook RF, Back A: The Stress Management Connection, the Healthy Eating Connection, the Active Lifestyle Connection. Alexandria, VA: ISA Associates, 1996.
13. Cook RF, Youngblood A: Preventing substance use as an integral part of worksite health promotion. Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews 1990; 5:725-738.
14. Cook RF, Back A, Trudeau J: Substance abuse prevention in the workplace: Recent findings and an expanded conceptual model. Journal of Primary Prevention 1996; 16:319-338.
15. Cook RF, Back AS, Trudeau J: Preventing alcohol use problems among blue-collar workers: A field test of the Working People program. Substance Use & Misuse 1996; 31:255-275.
16. Bandura A: Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
17. Bandura A: Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In: Flavel J, Ross L (Eds.): Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 200-239.
18. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, et al.: Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksite and families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day study. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89:54-60.
19. Hersch RK, Cook RF: Substance Abuse Prevention in the Workplace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, Nov. 17, 1998.
20. Johnson JP: Occupational Classification System Manual. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1998.
21. Cook RF, Bernstein A: Assessing drug use prevalence in the workplace: A comparison of self-report methods and urinalysis. International Journal of the Addictions 1994; 29:1057-1068.
22. Cook RF, Bernstein AD, Arrington TL, et al.: A comparison of self-report, urinalysis and hair analysis. International Journal of the Addictions 1995; 30:326-403.
23. Cook RF, Bernstein AD, Andrews CM: Assessing drug use in the workplace: A comparison of self-report, urinalysis and hair analysis. In: Harrison L, Hughes A (Eds.): The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. NIDA Research Monograph 167. NIH Pub. No. 96-4147. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997, pp. 247-272.
24. Cook RF, Hersch RK, McPherson TL: Drug assessment methods in the workplace. In: Mieczkowski T (Ed.): Drug Testing Technology: Assessment of Field Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1999, pp. 255-281.
25. Kessler R, Nelson C, McGonagle K: The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: Implications for prevention and service utilization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1996; 66:17-31.
26. Kessler R, McGonagle K: Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51:8-18.
27. Robins LN, Regier DA: Psychiatric Disorders In America: The Epidemiological Catchment Area Study. New York: Free Press, 1991.
28. Murray DM: Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
29. Ellickson PL, Hawes JA: An assessment of active versus passive methods for obtaining parental consent. Evaluation Review 1989; 13:45-55.