Competition for pollinators between invasive and native plants: Effects of spatial scale of investigation (note)

Ecoscience

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 138-141

  Jakobsson, Anna ^a,c   Padrón, Benigno ^b   Traveset, Anna ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTO MEDITERRÁNEO DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS   (Spain)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Competition; Diplotaxis erucoides; Invasive plants; Oxalis pes caprae; Pollination; Spatial scale

Indexed keywords

HERB; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; RANGE EXPANSION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

DIPLOTAXIS ERUCOIDES; OXALIS PES-CAPRAE;

EID: 66749151269     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2980/16-1-3193     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aigner, P. A., 2004. Ecological and genetic effects on demographic processes: Pollination, clonality and seed production in Dithyrea maritima. Biological Conservation, 116: 27-34.
2. Bjerknes, A. -L.,S. J. Hegland &, A. Nielsen, 2007. Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biological Conservation, 138: 1-12.
3. Brown, B. J., J. M. Randall & S. A. Graham, 2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (Purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology, 83: 2328-2336.
4. Campbell, D. R., 1985. Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubescens: Competition for pollination. Ecology, 66: 544-553.
5. Caruso, C. M., 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 54: 1546-1557.
6. Chittka, L. & S. Schürkens, 2001. Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature, 411: 653.
7. Fauna Europaea, 2004. Fauna Europaea version 1. 1. [Online] URL: http://faunaeur. org
8. Feldman, T. S., W. F. Morris & W. G. Wilson, 2004. When can two plant species facilitate each other's pollination? Oikos, 105: 197-207.
9. Ghazoul, J., 2004. Alien abduction: Disruption of native plant- pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica, 36: 156-164.
10. Greenleaf, S. S., N. M. Williams, R. Winfree & C. Kremen, 2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia, 153: 589-595.
11. Johnson, S. D., C. I. Peter, L. A. Nilsson & J. Ågren, 2003. Not cited in article. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology, 84: 2919-2927.
12. Kunin, W. E., 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 91: 129-133.
13. Larson, D. L., R. A. Royer & M. R. Royer, 2006. Insect visitation and pollen deposition in an invaded prairie plant community. Biological Conservation, 130: 148-159.
14. Levin, S. A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73: 1943-1967.
15. Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M. E., R. B. Hayes, M. R. Whalley & J. Memmott, 2007. The impact of an alien plant on native plant- pollinator network: An experimental approach. Ecology Letters, 10: 539-550.
16. Mitchell, C. E., A. A. Agrawal, J. D. Bever, G. S. Gilbert, R. A. Hufbauer, J. N. Klironomos, J. L. Maron, W. F. Morris, I. M. Parker, A. G. Power, E. W. Seabloom, M. E. Torchin & D. P. Vázquez, 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 9: 726-740.
17. Moeller, D. A., 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology, 85: 3289-3301.
18. Moragues, E. & A. Traveset, 2005. Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biological Conservation, 122: 611-619.
19. Nielsen, C., C. Heimes & J. Kollmann, 2008. Little evidence for negative effects of an invasive alien plant on pollinator services. Biological Invasions, DOI 10. 1007/s10530-007-9210-1.
20. Osborne, J. L., S. J. Clarke, R. J. Morris, I. H. Williams, J. R. Riley, A. D. Smith, D. R. Reynolds & A. S. Edwards, 1999. A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36: 519-533.
21. Peirce, J. R., 1997. The biology of Australian weeds. 31. Oxalis pes-caprae L. Plant Protection Quarterly, 12: 110-119.
22. Ratchke, B., 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pages 305-329 in L. Real (ed. ). Pollination Biology. Academic Press, London.
23. Schemske, B., 1988. Interactions for pollination among co-flowering shrubs. Ecology, 69: 446-457.
24. Steffan-Dewenter, I., U. Münzenberg, C. Bürger, C. Thies & T. Tscharntke, 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology, 83: 1421-1432.
25. Tilman, D. & P. Kareiva, 1997. Spatial Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
26. Totland, Ø., A. Nielsen, A. -L. Bjerknes & M. Ohlson, 2006. Effects of exotic plant and habitat disturbance on pollinator visitation and reproduction in a boreal forest herb. American Journal of Botany, 93: 868-873.
27. Traveset, A. & D. M. Richardson, 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21: 208-216.
28. Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (eds. ), 2001. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Veddeler, D., A. -M. Klein & T. Tscharntke, 2006. Contrasting responses of bee communities to coffee flowering at different spatial scales. Oikos, 112: 594-601.
30. White, E. M., J. C. Wilson & A. R. Clarke, 2006. Biotic indirect effects: A neglected concept in invasion biology. Diversity and Distributions, 12: 443-455.