Healthy Women's Motivators and Barriers to Participation in a Breast Cancer Cohort Study: A Qualitative Study

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 484-493

  Sinicrope, Pamela S ^a   Patten, Christi A ^a   Bonnema, Sarah M ^a   Almquist, Julka R ^a   Smith, Christina M ^a   Beebe, Timothy J ^a   Jacobsen, Steven J ^b   Vachon, Celine M ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b Southern California Permanente Medical Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer; Epidemiology; Focus Groups; Mammography; Participation; Qualitative; Recruitment; Social Cognitive Theory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTENT ANALYSIS; COPING BEHAVIOR; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EMOTIONALITY; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONG TERM CARE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOTIVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 66449116142     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Morton L.M., Cahill J., and Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol 163 (2006) 197-203
2. Galea S., and Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 17 (2007) 643-653
3. Gerber Y., Jacobsen S.J., Killian J.M., Weston S.A., and Roger V.L. Participation bias assessment in a community-based study of myocardial infarction, 2002-2005. Mayo Clin Proc. 82 (2007) 933-938
4. Jacobsen S.J., Mahoney D.W., Redfield M.M., Bailey K.R., Burnett Jr. J.C., and Rodeheffer R.J. Participation bias in a population-based echocardiography study. Ann Epidemiol 14 (2004) 579-584
5. Woolf S.H., Chan E.C., Harris R., Sheridan S.L., Braddock III C.H., Kaplan R.M., et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med 143 (2005) 293-300
6. Williams B., Irvine L., McGinnis A.R., McMurdo M.E., and Crombie I.K. When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project. BMC Health Serv Res 7 (2007) 59
7. La Verda N., and Teta M.J. Re: "Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice". Am J Epidemiol 164 (2006) 292
8. Groves R.M., Singer E., and Corning A. Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration. Public Opin Q 64 (2000) 299-308
9. Hox J.J., de Leeuw E.D., and Vorst H. Survey participation as reasoned action: a behavioral paradigm for survey nonresponse?. Bull Methodol Sociol 48 (1995) 52-67
10. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324 (2002) 1183
11. Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts IG. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000013. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub3.
12. Williams B., Entwistle V., Haddow G., and Wells M. Promoting research participation: why not advertise altruism?. Soc Sci Med 66 (2008) 1451-1456
13. Fry C.L. A comprehensive evidence-based approach is needed for promoting participation in health research: a commentary on Williams. Soc Sci Med 66 (2008) 1457-1460 discussion 1461-1462
14. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory (1986), Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River (NJ)
15. Baranowski T., Perry C.L., and Parcel G.S. How individuals, environments and health behavior interact: Social cognitive theory. In: Glanz K., Lewis F.M., and Rimer B.K. (Eds). Health behavioral and health education (1997), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (CA) 153-178
16. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In: Diclemente R., and Peterson J. (Eds). Preventing AIDS: theories and methods of behavioral interventions. AIDS prevention and mental health (1994), Plenum Press, New York 25-59
17. MMHS study materials. Available at:. http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mammohealthstudy/additional-resources.cfm Accessed on June 2007
18. Patton M.Q. Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative evaluation & research methods (1990), Sage, Newbury Park (CA) 15-198
19. Krueger R.A. Developing questions for focus groups. Focus Group Kit Vol. 3 (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA)
20. Knodel J. The design and analysis of focus group studies: a practical approach. In: Morgan D.L. (Ed). Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art (1993), Sage, Newbury Park (CA)
21. NVivo. NVivo Qualitative data analysis software; 2006.
22. Shuhatovich O.M., Sharman M.P., Mirabal Y.N., Earle N.R., Follen M., and Basen-Engquist K. Participant recruitment and motivation for participation in optical technology for cervical cancer screening research trials. Gynecol Oncol 99 3 Suppl 1 (2005) S226-S231
23. Lansimies-Antikainen H., Pietila A., Laitinen T., Schwab U., Rauramaa R., and Lansimies E. Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study. J Adv Nurs 59 (2007) 146-154
24. Schaefer K.M., Ladd E., Gergits M.A., and Gyauch L. Backing and forthing: the process of decision making by women considering participation in a breast cancer prevention trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 28 (2001) 703-709
25. Lund E., and Gram I.T. Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med 26 (1998) 154-160
26. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (1997), W.H. Freeman & Co., New York
27. Eaker S., Bergstrom R., Bergstrom A., Adami H.O., and Nyren O. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol 147 (1998) 74-82
28. Hoffman S.C., Burke A.E., Helzlsouer K.J., and Comstock G.W. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 148 (1998) 1007-1011
29. Miller S.M., Rodoletz M., Mangan C.E., Schroeder C.M., and Sedlacek T.V. Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats. Health Psychol 15 (1996) 216-225
30. Verheggen F.W., Jonkers R., and Kok G. Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns 29 (1996) 137-153
31. Ives N.J., Troop M., Waters A., Davies S., Higgs C., and Easterbrook P.J. Does an HIV clinical trial information booklet improve patient knowledge and understanding of HIV clinical trials?. HIV Med 2 (2001) 241-249